Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 09:27 AM Aug 2013

Raiding the "Corporate Store": The NSA's Unfettered Access to a Vast Pool of Americans' Phone Data

08/02/2013



Raiding the "Corporate Store": The NSA's Unfettered Access to a Vast Pool of Americans' Phone Data
By Patrick C. Toomey, Fellow, ACLU National Security Project at 10:10am

The director of National Intelligence declassified three documents on Wednesday related to the NSA's mass collection of Americans' telephone records. One of these — a so-called "primary order" issued by the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) — describes in new detail the rules that the NSA must follow when it collects and queries this trove of sensitive telephone data. What it reveals is not reassuring. Despite intelligence officials' repeated assertions that their access to Americans' phone records is extremely limited and tightly controlled, the primary order suggests NSA analysts can sift through far more telephone data — with far fewer restrictions — than government officials have let on in public. In particular, the primary order shows that NSA analysts have unfettered access to a pool of telephone data called the "corporate store," which likely contains millions of Americans' calling records.

Intelligence officials have repeatedly said that the NSA queries its call-records database only when there is "reasonable suspicion, based on specific and articulated facts" that an identifier — such as a telephone number — is linked to specific foreign terrorist organizations. They have frequently cited one statistic to back up these assertions: According to officials, the NSA queried fewer than 300 unique identifiers under this program in 2012.

As we have pointed out, though, even if the government ran queries on only 300 unique identifiers in 2012, those searches implicated the privacy of millions of Americans. Intelligence officials have explained that analysts are permitted to examine the call records of all individuals within three "hops" of a specific target. As a result, a query yields call information not only about the individual thought to be associated with a specific foreign terrorist organization, but about all of those separated from that individual by one, two, or three degrees. Even if one assumes, conservatively, that each person has an average of 40 unique contacts, an analyst who accessed the records of everyone within three hops of an initial target would have accessed records concerning more than two million people. Multiply that figure by the 300 phone numbers the NSA says that it searched in 2012, and by the seven years the program has apparently been in place, and it quickly becomes clear that official efforts to characterize the extent and impact of this program are deeply misleading.

This much we've known for several weeks. But thanks to the documents released yesterday, we now have a better idea about what happens to the information that's pulled up through queries. All of this information, the primary order says, is dumped into something called the "corporate store." Incredibly, the FISC imposes no restrictions on what analysts may subsequently do with the information. The FISC's primary order contains a crucially revealing footnote stating that "the Court understands that NSA may apply the full range of SIGINT analytic tradecraft to the result of intelligence analysis queries of the collected (telephone) metadata." In short, once a calling record is added to the corporate store, anything goes.

More troubling, if the government is combining the results of all its queries in this "corporate store," as seems likely, then it has a massive pool of telephone data that it can analyze in any way it chooses, unmoored from the specific investigations that gave rise to the initial queries. To put it in individual terms: If, for some reason, your phone number happens to be within three hops of an NSA target, all of your calling records may be in the corporate store, and thus available for any NSA analyst to search at will.

But it's even worse than that. The primary order prominently states that whenever the government accesses the wholesale telephone-metadata database, "an auditable record of the activity shall be generated." It might feel fairly comforting to know that, if the government abuses its access to all Americans' call data, it might eventually be called to account—until you read footnote 6 of the primary order, which exempts entirely the government's use of the "corporate store" from the audit-trail requirement.

The FISC's rules provide the appearance of limited and targeted access to Americans' phone records — but the reality is far different. When a single query is, in fact, a three-hop frolic through American's phone records, the initial restraints lose much of their force. And, when the NSA can combine the results of all these queries for future, unrestricted analysis, the FISC's front-end protections have almost no significance at all. The weakness of the back-end controls renders the front-end protections all but irrelevant.

Learn more about government surveillance and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.


Permitted Distribution. Unless the specific web page from which ACLU text materials is available indicates you may not do so, you may copy or distribute any text materials that appear on the ACLU Site in print or digital format

http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/raiding-corporate-store-nsas-unfettered-access-vast-pool-americans-phone-data

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Raiding the "Corporate Store": The NSA's Unfettered Access to a Vast Pool of Americans' Phone Data (Original Post) Catherina Aug 2013 OP
Thank you Edward Snowden for raising the national awareness of how far afield some of our government RC Aug 2013 #1
+1 n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #2
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2013 #3
Surely someone should be coming along soon demanding 'proof' that matthews Aug 2013 #4
Kicked and Recommended. Enthusiast Aug 2013 #5
"Corporate store" is an extremely offensive term for it. Waiting For Everyman Aug 2013 #6
When 90% of the people actually doing the work are employed by huge corporations Ford_Prefect Aug 2013 #8
With all the private contractors having access to the data base, what else to call it? RC Aug 2013 #10
ACLU makes clearer how the agency can appear to be "following the rules"and yet violate Ford_Prefect Aug 2013 #7
k/r Dawson Leery Aug 2013 #9
K&R nt Zorra Aug 2013 #11
great illustration! nashville_brook Aug 2013 #12
K&R. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #13
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #14
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
1. Thank you Edward Snowden for raising the national awareness of how far afield some of our government
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 09:52 AM
Aug 2013
agencies have gone against our own people.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
6. "Corporate store" is an extremely offensive term for it.
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 12:03 PM
Aug 2013

Just what, exactly, is that supposed to mean? Does the NSA view itself as a corporation? Or, more likely, is it that blatant about serving the corporatist agenda?

Ford_Prefect

(7,885 posts)
8. When 90% of the people actually doing the work are employed by huge corporations
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 12:10 PM
Aug 2013

corporate methodology becomes endemic and inescapable.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
10. With all the private contractors having access to the data base, what else to call it?
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 12:26 PM
Aug 2013

Company store would work too.

Ford_Prefect

(7,885 posts)
7. ACLU makes clearer how the agency can appear to be "following the rules"and yet violate
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 12:04 PM
Aug 2013

Constitutional rights as SOP. This kind of obfuscation is what the Pentagon and State department have used to hide what the public would not approve under any conditions, including state of war.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Raiding the "Corporate St...