General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe droned 4 more "Al-Qiada militants" in Yemen last night. Notice the designation.
US officials confirm reports that 4 al-Qaida militants killed in an American drone strike in Yemen overnightBreaking News Headline
http://www.breakingnews.com/
Usually the targets are retroactively named militants OR Al-Qaida ( in various spellings)
But last night some joystick jockey sitting in air condittioned comfort managed to splatter 4 people,
which were identified to the news as both militants AND Al-Qaida.
I have also seen strikes reported as against "islamic militants" which makes me wonder if there are now non-Islamic militants AND
Al-Qaida militants AND Islamic militants, AND just Al-Quaida,(with or without the U)
plus we were droning the Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan for awhile, but apparently have stopped doing that.
Tis all very confusing.
AppleBottom
(201 posts)Summary execution is the new progressive.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)AppleBottom
(201 posts)Thanks for holding Americans to the same standards as terrorist.
Also thanks for invoking propaganda to devalue tragic events.
think
(11,641 posts)window dressing.....
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)be innocent civilians. Reports have been fabricated before.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I wish more people had paid attention to Bin Ladin's 2004 message; it captures the nihilistic logic perfectly. "Al Qaeda" is a brand invented as a term of convenience by the US DoD (it came from Saudi militants in Afghanistan in the 1980's saying "it would be really great if we had a database (qaeda) of all the militants we've worked with to use in the next war", a database which Zawahiri eventually produced and Bin Ladin then used for fundraising).
Anyways, UBL's point was that by elevating that one name, we gave him a banner he could raise "in the remotest mountains" and tie down four divisions of the most powerful military on earth. Furthermore, the whole sick power of a brand is that it's true whenever people think it's true: a militant in Yemen (and there are plenty) becomes a Qaedi simply by calling himself that, or even being called it by others. Whatever his view on the Near vs. Far Enemy debate (which is what originally separated AQ from MB), the US claims him as a kill and Bin Ladin's successors claim him as a shahid; everybody's happy except the poor bastards who get blown up by one of the two making the claims.
If you haven't read Hegel on the dialectical nature of history, this is probably a good invitation to do so; only three octaves down and in a minor key.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)I agree with your point.....Naomi Wolf had her finger on the issue when she called it Disaster Capitalism. Just took her more words to say it.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)She talks more generally about branding as a concept in "No Logo"
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)You ever have one of those days when you just can't wake up?