Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 04:30 AM Aug 2013

Taken-Under civil forfeiture, Americans who haven’t been charged with crimes can be stripped of

their cash, cars, and even homes. Is that all we’re losing?

(This is a long but eye-opening read. Even if you have read about civil forfeitures, the scope of the problem as recounted in this article is astounding. It is also frightening and beyond outrageous.
What kind of country have we become? Not one I am particulry proud of on too many occasions.)

On a bright Thursday afternoon in 2007, Jennifer Boatright, a waitress at a Houston bar-and-grill, drove with her two young sons and her boyfriend, Ron Henderson, on U.S. 59 toward Linden, Henderson’s home town, near the Texas-Louisiana border. They made the trip every April, at the first signs of spring, to walk the local wildflower trails and spend time with Henderson’s father. This year, they’d decided to buy a used car in Linden, which had plenty for sale, and so they bundled their cash savings in their car’s center console. Just after dusk, they passed a sign that read “Welcome to Tenaha: A little town with BIG Potential!”

They pulled into a mini-mart for snacks. When they returned to the highway ten minutes later, Boatright, a honey-blond “Texas redneck from Lubbock,” by her own reckoning, and Henderson, who is Latino, noticed something strange. The same police car that their eleven-year-old had admired in the mini-mart parking lot was trailing them. Near the city limits, a tall, bull-shouldered officer named Barry Washington pulled them over.

He asked if Henderson knew that he’d been driving in the left lane for more than half a mile without passing.

No, Henderson replied. He said he’d moved into the left lane so that the police car could make its way onto the highway.

Were there any drugs in the car? When Henderson and Boatright said no, the officer asked if he and his partner could search the car.
<Snip>
Much more: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/08/12/130812fa_fact_stillman

smh.....
I have no more hair left to catch on fire. I am not out of outrage. I am just exhausted from having it elicited 24/7.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taken-Under civil forfeiture, Americans who haven’t been charged with crimes can be stripped of (Original Post) Are_grits_groceries Aug 2013 OP
He warned that millions of dollars raised by forfeiture “could very easily be lost". OMG. dkf Aug 2013 #1
Drug War Treasure Bath!!! Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #2
Only in the USA.............. dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #3
scary. HiPointDem Aug 2013 #4
Well said, A-g-g... OneGrassRoot Aug 2013 #5
Blame G.H.W. Bush and anyone in Congress then kwijybo Aug 2013 #6
Yep. It was advertised as a tool against drug kingpins... JHB Aug 2013 #7
THIS!! eShirl Aug 2013 #8
The public doesn't know about it. n/t hootinholler Aug 2013 #20
At least we aren't an authoritarian police state like russia. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #9
The interesting part is the end with his deposition... Sotf Aug 2013 #10
They hate us for our freedumb.....nt Enthusiast Aug 2013 #11
Demas and Repubs are both to blame. As much as I despise anyone who has anything to do with drugs, 7962 Aug 2013 #12
K&R JoeyT Aug 2013 #13
They tried this at the Las Vegas airport for about a day Nevernose Aug 2013 #14
Im surprised more people didnt know this. bunnies Aug 2013 #15
So few know probably because these stories get so little press. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #16
Yeah. Its really fucked up. bunnies Aug 2013 #17
I think this is an outrageous conflict of interest. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #18
Agreed. bunnies Aug 2013 #19
Another thing that bothers me about this practice is that it serves as a wealth transfer avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #21
Freaked me out! Lifelong Protester Aug 2013 #22
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
1. He warned that millions of dollars raised by forfeiture “could very easily be lost". OMG.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 04:36 AM
Aug 2013
“We all know the way things are right now—budgets are tight,” Steve Westbrook, the executive director of the Sheriffs’ Association of Texas, says. “It’s definitely a valuable asset to law enforcement, for purchasing equipment and getting things you normally wouldn’t be able to get to fight crime.” Many officers contend that their departments would collapse if the practice were too heavily regulated, and that a valuable public-safety measure would be lost.


How is this not stealing? Outrageous.

More and more evidence certain Government agencies, local and Federal, are out of control

kwijybo

(225 posts)
6. Blame G.H.W. Bush and anyone in Congress then
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 06:11 AM
Aug 2013

That's how long this has been going on. When it started, if I recall correctly,TX and LA were the worst places for this.

The really bad part of this is that to get your money or property back will cost about $15k-$25k, so if it isn't worth that...

JHB

(37,152 posts)
7. Yep. It was advertised as a tool against drug kingpins...
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 06:44 AM
Aug 2013

Last edited Wed Aug 7, 2013, 05:39 PM - Edit history (1)

...but in practice it's a tool for localities to shake down anyone who doesn't look to have enough clout to fight back.

(Edited to generalize -- not just out-of-towers)

eShirl

(18,477 posts)
8. THIS!!
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 07:09 AM
Aug 2013

My only surprise is for A QUARTER CENTURY now the public hasn't gotten upset enough to stop this.

 

Sotf

(76 posts)
10. The interesting part is the end with his deposition...
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 07:31 AM
Aug 2013

... and the pure belief that anyone going through his area should have to justify to him whether or not they should keep X property.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
12. Demas and Repubs are both to blame. As much as I despise anyone who has anything to do with drugs,
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 07:36 AM
Aug 2013

this shit is ridiculous. I remember writing a paper on this in high school years ago when it first started. Its unconstitutional dammit. They wouldnt take their TV or microwave or anything else they may be carrying. It's fine if you're convicted of drug running, but this is a cash cow.
One of my jobs is to load private ATM machines. On those days I may be carrying 30-50K with me, along with a gun. I have been through traffic stops but never asked to be searched. I've often wondered if they would try to take MY money. I always carry my receipt from the bank showing the withdrawal, as well as a list of machines I'll be visiting, etc. But I bet if I passed through that shithole town they'd probably STILL try to take it.
This must stop. As more of these stories become public, more and more of the "get tough on drugs" crowd ARE changing their mind. My parents are 2 examples; after seeing a local story of the cops taking over 100k from a driver on I-75 pulled over for a "window tint violation", but never charged with anything. My dad said "well, if they think he's a drug dealer why didnt they arrest him?" I said because they only wanted the money. Both my folks said "Thats not right". Its a start

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
14. They tried this at the Las Vegas airport for about a day
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 03:10 PM
Aug 2013

"Arrested" the cash of several people coming or going through Las Vegas. It never occurred to the brain trust at Metro that there might, just possibly, be a reason people coming to Vegas had large amounts of cash that wasn't drug-related.

They still use asset forfeiture pretty heavily in some neighborhoods (I'm sure y'all can guess the predominant skin color in those neighborhoods), but at least they've learned to leave the tourists alone for stuff like that.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
16. So few know probably because these stories get so little press.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 03:45 PM
Aug 2013

This practice gives me the chills. I am positively ill over it.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
17. Yeah. Its really fucked up.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 04:03 PM
Aug 2013

I dont know how it isnt stealing. Especially when someone hasnt committed a crime. And if you *do* commit a crime forget it. They can take everything you own. They dont even have to prove it was purchased using money from illegal activities. Talk about a motive for setting people up. Its disgusting.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
18. I think this is an outrageous conflict of interest.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 04:10 PM
Aug 2013

Law enforcement that is supposed to be protecting the people, at the same time motivated and sanctioned by their jobs to steal real valuables from the most vulnerable members of the public.

Chilling and disgusting.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
19. Agreed.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 04:20 PM
Aug 2013

Yet the wonder why so many people arent fans of Police. hmmm. People with guns and power who can lie with impunity and steal our stuff? Whats not to love?

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
21. Another thing that bothers me about this practice is that it serves as a wealth transfer
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 04:58 PM
Aug 2013

from the poor and working class to the government and to law enforcement.

That's immoral and wrong on every level.





Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
22. Freaked me out!
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 07:31 PM
Aug 2013

Just read the article in the New Yorker. I admit (some) ignorance before reading this. Wow, this is a "wake the hell up" read for sure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Taken-Under civil forfeit...