Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 08:57 AM Aug 2013

Did George W. Bush Really Need A Stent?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larryhusten/2013/08/06/questions-about-president-george-w-bushs-stent/

(Updated) – Former President George W. Bush received a stent today at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital. Here is the statement from Bush’s office:

“During President George W. Bush’s annual physical examination at the Cooper Clinic in Dallas yesterday, a blockage was discovered in an artery in his heart. At the recommendation of his doctors, President Bush agreed to have a stent placed to open the blockage. The procedure was performed successfully this morning, without complication, at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital. President Bush is in high spirits, eager to return home tomorrow and resume his normal schedule on Thursday. He is grateful to the skilled medical professionals who have cared for him. He thanks his family, friends, and fellow citizens for their prayers and well wishes. And he encourages us all to get our regular check-ups.

As someone who has followed the intense debate and discussion that has occurred in the cardiology community in the last few years about precisely this sort of case, I’m wondering about a number of issues raised here:

Did Bush experience any symptoms as a result of his blockage? According to the official statement, the blockage was uncovered during a routine annual physical examination so it seems unlikely that Bush had severe or unstable symptomatic disease. It’s unclear how Bush progressed from a routine examination to a stent implantation in less than 24 hours. This would not be a usual occurrence for most people.

(snip)

2. It’s often been pointed out that celebrities and VIPs receive medical care that differs from what the rest of us receive. But it’s unclear whether celebrity care is really any better. Many people believe that the undue attention given to celebrities leads to inferior care. Right now there’s no way to know what side of this question Bush’s case illustrates.

(end snip)

I heard Nancy Snyderman raise similar questions on Morning Jerk this morning. She was asking if Bush was not symptomatic, why the emergent stent procedure? She said they found a narrowing, not a blocked artery.

Asside from Bush's own statement that he hoped we all had frequent checkups (which millions of us don't have access to, Chimpy, thanks for reminding us), this may also be sending the wrong message as well.
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did George W. Bush Really Need A Stent? (Original Post) deminks Aug 2013 OP
I would have recommended a stake. Scuba Aug 2013 #1
and a nice steak and fava beans..... with chianti Mr. David Aug 2013 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author trusty elf Aug 2013 #4
If you are lucky enough to have check ups rurallib Aug 2013 #3
Annual check-ups are now free thanks to Obamacare. tridim Aug 2013 #15
I can't afford follow ups. rurallib Aug 2013 #16
But you said you couldn't afford both. tridim Aug 2013 #18
please if you do not know my finances do not argue with me rurallib Aug 2013 #20
Just stop spreading falsehoods about the ACA. tridim Aug 2013 #21
what falsehoods? rurallib Aug 2013 #22
.... to his brain, maybe .... but not his heart. Myrina Aug 2013 #5
Perhaps, but not as much as he needs an enema. nt Buns_of_Fire Aug 2013 #6
I'm not a physician, I don't know what W's physician found and I'm not going to second guess Arkansas Granny Aug 2013 #7
my husband had that narrowing but his cardiologist said "no stent needed." CTyankee Aug 2013 #8
It depends on the extent of the blockage B2G Aug 2013 #11
well, he had both the surgical cleaning and is on regular meds. It's a lot of pill taking but CTyankee Aug 2013 #14
I'm glad he's doing well. B2G Aug 2013 #17
My biggest worry with him is falling. He's had 2 spinal surgeries and has recovered very nicely CTyankee Aug 2013 #19
You don't have to have symptoms to have a severe blockage B2G Aug 2013 #9
Another link deminks Aug 2013 #10
People sometimes have symptoms and don't know what they are. yellowcanine Aug 2013 #12
Yes. My mom had severe carotid blockage that was found B2G Aug 2013 #13
Yet another link: Bloomberg: George Bush’s Stent Surgery Revives Debate on Heart Care deminks Aug 2013 #23
It wasn't a stent. It was an upgrade to the microchip. n/t UTUSN Aug 2013 #24

Response to Scuba (Reply #1)

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
3. If you are lucky enough to have check ups
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:03 AM
Aug 2013

can you afford the treatment?

Well I can't afford either so maybe Mr. Bush can have my stent as well.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
18. But you said you couldn't afford both.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:50 AM
Aug 2013


Misinformation about the reality of Obamacare drives me up the wall.

I expect it on Faux, but not on DU.

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
20. please if you do not know my finances do not argue with me
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:57 AM
Aug 2013

yes I know that there are free check ups, but the follow ups and prescriptions are not. I have a very high deductible which pretty much precludes medical care except emergencies.
Hopefully next year, Obamacare will make some insurance more affordable. If not I am about 13 months from medicare. I am trying my best to balance a precarious situation.
I fought like hell for single payer that never got a sniff. i cried the morning Joe Lieberman decided that maybe he could not actually support lowering the medicare age.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
21. Just stop spreading falsehoods about the ACA.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 10:00 AM
Aug 2013

It's embarrassing to DU.

Just put me on ignore if you don't want to talk about it. Have a good one.

Arkansas Granny

(31,514 posts)
7. I'm not a physician, I don't know what W's physician found and I'm not going to second guess
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:22 AM
Aug 2013

his diagnosis or the treatment.

There is no doubt that W receives better medical care than millions of other people, but he's certainly not the only one who does. I wish we could all have that level of care, and we all deserve it, but I don't begrudge the people who have it for making use of it.

CTyankee

(63,901 posts)
8. my husband had that narrowing but his cardiologist said "no stent needed."
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:24 AM
Aug 2013

He's on appropriate medication and doing very well, now 4 years later...

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
11. It depends on the extent of the blockage
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:26 AM
Aug 2013

If the artery is over 90% blocked, a stent is required. Less than that can sometimes be treated by surgically cleaning it out or meds.

CTyankee

(63,901 posts)
14. well, he had both the surgical cleaning and is on regular meds. It's a lot of pill taking but
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:39 AM
Aug 2013

hubby's fine, exercising, eating a good diet, and having his one glass of red wine at night....

CTyankee

(63,901 posts)
19. My biggest worry with him is falling. He's had 2 spinal surgeries and has recovered very nicely
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:52 AM
Aug 2013

but must steady himself with a cane and needs the extra railings we put in the stairwell. Because he's on Coumadin, a fall resulting in a bad cut could be disastrous...

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
9. You don't have to have symptoms to have a severe blockage
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:24 AM
Aug 2013

and require a stent. I don't understand the contraversy.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
12. People sometimes have symptoms and don't know what they are.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:30 AM
Aug 2013

They think it is a case of mild indigestion or a sore muscle, etc. but it is actually a vascular problem. I don't think it is particularly useful for people to try to diagnose medical problems on TV based on news reports. We were highly critical of Bill Frist for doing this in the Terry Schiavo case. Let's be consistent.

Yes, Presidents get good medical care. So what? They would regardless of what kind of medical insurance system we had in the United States. I don't see the case of an individual President as being particularly instructive, particularly since we don't know the actual details. Let's keep our focus on universal access to good medical care regardless of rank or income and not get distracted by celebrity medicine.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
13. Yes. My mom had severe carotid blockage that was found
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 09:38 AM
Aug 2013

in a routine physical. She was completely asymptomatic.

They stented on side (VERY quickly) and cleaned out the other surgically. She's just fine now, but was essentially a time bomb.

Sometimes the topics on this site astound me.

deminks

(11,014 posts)
23. Yet another link: Bloomberg: George Bush’s Stent Surgery Revives Debate on Heart Care
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 10:21 AM
Aug 2013
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-06/former-president-s-stent-surgery-reopens-debate-on-heart-care.html

Former President George W. Bush’s decision to allow doctors to use a stent to clear a blocked heart artery, performed absent symptoms, is reviving a national debate on the best way to treat early cardiac concerns.

The discussions have been ongoing since 2007, when the trial known as Courage first found that less costly drug therapy averted heart attacks, hospitalizations and deaths just as well as stents in patients with chest pain. The results were confirmed two years later in a second large trial.

(snip)

Stents are lifesaving when patients are in the midst of a heart attack, said Chet Rihal, an interventional cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, who has studied use of the devices. They allow immediate and sustained blood flow that help a patient recover, he said.

For those who aren’t suffering a heart attack, the benefits are less clear, according to Rihal. While stents may be used in patients with clear chest pain, there’s no evidence that they prevent future heart attacks, he said.

Two large-scale clinical trials completed within the last seven years have shown that drug therapy works just as well as stents in preventing cardiac complications. The three major U.S. heart associations changed their guidelines in 2011 in an effort to reduce excess treatment. A review of eight studies published last year in JAMA Internal Medicine also found no differences.

(end snip)
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did George W. Bush Really...