General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat I'd do if I was in a government and wanted to get access to
important and potentially dangerous information being communicated online:
I'd have somebody start some companies that offered Internet users complete privacy for their communications. Unbreakable encryption, IP anonymity, and other features that people could use to hide the content and even the existence of their communications. I'd make those companies appear to be clearly non-government, and would probably use content that condemned the government for spying on people and decrying that spying. I'd bury any evidence that the government was in any way involved with the companies so deeply that it would be known by only a few people who were absolutely trustworthy.
And then, I'd watch what flowed through the companies carefully, have computers to parse the information, looking for stuff of interest to the government. Then, I'd encrypt it as promised and send it along to its destination. Any information found that had to do with terrorist plans or plots to damage the government would be carefully cleaned of its connection with that company and fed to agencies whose job it was do deal with such plans and plots.
That's what I'd do. I might even base the company in some neutral country or do anything else I could think of to keep the actual government ownership a secret. I might even let it slip that the government was able to snoop on private communications so people would feel threatened and want access to anonymous, encrypted communications capabilities.
If someone came sniffing around eventually, I'd just shut one of the companies down suddenly and claim that I was doing so because the government was about to demand access to information.
Yup, that's what I'd do. Absolutely. But I'm very clever. Probably, governments aren't smart enough to think up something like that, you know. Governments are really stupid and don't really understand technological possiblities Yeah...they wouldn't do something like that....
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)"No one ever imagined they'd fly airplanes into buildings" Wink>>
This is your government. Get used to it, or what?
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Not just the US government. I'm not being restrictive at all, you know. Anyone can offer "secure" communications services. Anyone.
And not just anyone can tell the military to fly the other way, away from the action.
Nice to see realization; that parts of our government are as crooked as any Mafia. Not too many of the formerly anti-CT people are so anti-CT these days. They've been edumacted, eh?
leftstreet
(36,103 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)It's something worth thinking about, if you're interested in secure communications.
alc
(1,151 posts)The government says they helped build it for their own use but it only works if lots of us use it. There are plenty of conspiracy theories that they actually built it to get us using their system for encrypted/anonymous traffic so that they can track that traffic. I have discounted those theories in the past but may reconsider. Even if their initial intentions were good I have little doubt they are doing everything they can to enable monitoring now.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)a couple of "secure" email providers. I found that very interesting, you know...