Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,846 posts)
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:10 PM Aug 2013

Judge indicates Bay Area transit strike reprieve, supporting Gov. Brown’s request

Source: Associated Press

Judge indicates Bay Area transit strike reprieve, supporting Gov. Brown's request

By Associated Press, Updated: Sunday, August 11, 12:36 PM

SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco Bay Area commuters are set to get a reprieve from a potential transit strike after a judge indicated at a hearing Sunday that he would grant California Gov. Jerry Brown’s request for a 60-day cooling-off period in negotiations.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Curtis Karnow is expected to issue a formal order granting the injunction later Sunday. Bay Area Rapid Transit trains would run for at least the next 60 days while the two sides are expected to negotiate further.

Brown’s request came after a panel appointed by the governor to investigate the labor dispute concluded that a strike would cause significant harm to the public’s health, safety and welfare.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/judge-indicates-bay-area-transit-strike-reprieve-in-ruling/2013/08/11/71ed8126-02a3-11e3-bfc5-406b928603b2_story.html
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge indicates Bay Area transit strike reprieve, supporting Gov. Brown’s request (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2013 OP
"significant harm to the public’s health, safety and welfare." Teamster Jeff Aug 2013 #1
Doubt that his big donors ride public transportation. woolldog Aug 2013 #3
good. Niceguy1 Aug 2013 #2

Teamster Jeff

(1,598 posts)
1. "significant harm to the public’s health, safety and welfare."
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:19 PM
Aug 2013

What bullshit.

More like significant inconvenience to campaign donors and voters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge indicates Bay Area ...