Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Cut twice and then measure." Please come CAPTION Bill O'Reilly!!!
Bill (Wanker Extraordinaire) O'Reilly is saying: "North Carolina's new voter law is misguided in two ways. First they've opened themselves up to charges of racism and voter suppression. Secondly it should be drafted in a manner that gives greater weight to the votes by those who have made our country great and at the same time tighten restrictions to eliminate voter fraud. . . . After all, why should someone who just wants a free lunch have a vote that counts as much as someone who is building this country and paying his taxes? . . . It doesn't make sense. . . . If they follow my advice, they can pitch it as a Voter Enhancement Law, and nobody could possibly claim racism was involved in that! . . . Now its time for our fair-and-balanced debate: Why does Obama hate America so much?"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1079 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Cut twice and then measure." Please come CAPTION Bill O'Reilly!!! (Original Post)
skip fox
Aug 2013
OP
"That would be voter suppression. Rather, I'd give the businessman vote or the entrepreneur's
skip fox
Aug 2013
#6
"that gives greater weight to the votes by those who have made our country great"
krispos42
Aug 2013
#2
pscot
(21,024 posts)1. Maybe the votes of poor folks could be counted
as a fraction of a vote; say 3/5ths or some such.
damyank913
(787 posts)3. C'mon! Everybody knows that 3/5ths is too much...
...look at what happened last time . By the way, does anyone know how 3/5ths were originally arrived at?
skip fox
(19,356 posts)6. "That would be voter suppression. Rather, I'd give the businessman vote or the entrepreneur's
one-and-two-fifths weight."
krispos42
(49,445 posts)2. "that gives greater weight to the votes by those who have made our country great"
Translation: rich white people.
Rich white people that suck at the government teat for billions of dollars annually.
But $30 a week in food stamps? Can't vote! So sorry, try again later.
skip fox
(19,356 posts)4. "People say that Apartheid in South Africa didn't work. . . . I say,
they just didn't give it a chance!"
Liberal In Texas
(13,531 posts)5. I would imagine that the measure of "who is building this country"
will be the size of that persons bank account. Wonder if Billo is going to want the "high value voters" to have to disclose how much money they have in Swiss bank accounts and fake corporations on the Bahamas.
skip fox
(19,356 posts)7. "Listen, if people can afford to pay for weed, rap, and Lott tickets, they can pay to vote!"