Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 07:30 PM Aug 2013

I wonder how this will look in campaign ads

WASHINGTON — In another setback for President Obama’s health care initiative, the administration has delayed until 2015 a significant consumer protection in the law that limits how much people may have to spend on their own health care.

...

Under the policy, many group health plans will be able to maintain separate out-of-pocket limits for benefits in 2014. As a result, a consumer may be required to pay $6,350 for doctors’ services and hospital care, and an additional $6,350 for prescription drugs under a plan administered by a pharmacy benefit manager.

Some consumers may have to pay even more, as some group health plans will not be required to impose any limit on a patient’s out-of-pocket costs for drugs next year. If a drug plan does not currently have a limit on out-of-pocket costs, it will not have to impose one for 2014, federal officials said Monday.

...But federal officials said that many insurers and employers needed more time to comply because they used separate companies to help administer major medical coverage and drug benefits, with separate limits on out-of-pocket costs.

In many cases, the companies have separate computer systems that cannot communicate with one another.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/us/a-limit-on-consumer-costs-is-delayed-in-health-care-law.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&


I'm not even going to pretend to be a fan of the PPACA. I think it herds us into private profit coffers under government unction while leaving us as taxpayers liable for the inevitable shoddy business practices that follow once companies realize they have a captive audience. It's nothing more than a government imposed monopoly.

That being said the cap on consumer costs has now been delayed. Imagine the worst spin possible the GOP can put on this and you'll see what 2014 is shaping-up to become.

Oh yeah, I almost forget -- and many families will be devastated by the year-long money grab...which I'm sure will also be GOP ad-fodder.

*sigh*
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wonder how this will look in campaign ads (Original Post) Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 OP
Not just gop fodder. nt babylonsister Aug 2013 #1
Looks to me like you're using it DevonRex Aug 2013 #2
I'll answer your question if you reciprocate by telling us what's good about compulsory Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #3

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
2. Looks to me like you're using it
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 07:43 PM
Aug 2013

for anti-Obama fodder, too. So you tell us. How does it look in campaign ads?

Since you admit right there in writing that you really hate the program to begin with and all...

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
3. I'll answer your question if you reciprocate by telling us what's good about compulsory
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 09:07 PM
Aug 2013

corporate profits with zero private liability.

Deal?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I wonder how this will lo...