Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tony_FLADEM

(3,023 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:19 AM Aug 2013

The CIA Has Finally Admitted It Was Involved In The 1953 Iranian Coup

Hot on the heels of admitting that Area 51 really does exist, the CIA has finally admitted to another widely known secret: that the agency played a key role in the 1953 overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddeq after he sought to nationalize the Iranian oil industry.

Like the Area 51 non-revelation, we have George Washington University's National Security Archive to thank for this. The Archive was able to get a new, less-redacted version of a 1970s official CIA history of the coup, which gives a clear indication of CIA involvement.

While the history had previously been released in 1981 after a lawsuit from the ACLU, many of the key points — especially a section labeled "Covert Action" — were redacted. The new version, declassified in 2011, includes this key line:

CIA Iran



Again, the key line reads:

When it became apparent that many elements in Iran did not approve of Mosadeq's continuing gamble or the direction in which he was pushing their country, the execution of a U.S.-assisted coup d'etat seemed a more desirable risk than letting matters run their predictable course.

Of course, this is pretty much common knowledge. The New York Times published what it claimed was a leaked 1954 CIA-written account of the coup in 2000 (you can read that over at the National Security Archive), and that same year then-U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called the coup a "setback for setback for Iran's political development," adding that "it is easy to see now why many Iranians continue to resent this intervention by America in their internal affairs."

It is still, however, an important admission. The ousting of Mosaddeq 60 years ago today and the now-confirmed Western involvement in it (London remains tight lipped but it's probably safe to assume MI6 was involved too) is seen by many Iranians to be just one of the disastrous examples of unwanted Western intervention in Iran and the Middle East in general. As Malcolm Bryne writes at Foreign Policy, the coup's "reverberations have haunted its orchestrators over the years, contributing to the anti-Americanism that accompanied the Shah's ouster in early 1979, and even influencing the Iranians who seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran later that year."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/cia-admits-1953-iran-coup-role-2013-8#ixzz2cQdgXcJE

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
1. So who do we blame for this?
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:33 AM
Aug 2013

The nationalization of the oil started in 51 (Truman) and the actual coup was during 53 (Eisenhower).

The plans were likely laid during the periods of both presidents. One a Democrat and one a much-beloved-by-the-DU republicon.

So who am I supposed to get angry at?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
4. I blame the CIA and everyone involved in shaping U.S. foreign policy
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:36 AM
Aug 2013

along with everyone who stood to benefit from the coup....

malthaussen

(17,187 posts)
5. Coincidental timing?
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:38 AM
Aug 2013

Or is this another smoke-and-mirrors operation? Only members of the die-hard head-in-the-sand brigade believed otherwise, so why "reveal" this now? Never look where the magician wants you to look.

-- Mal

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
7. The CIA's involvement has long been known, including that Kermit Roosevelt
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:48 AM
Aug 2013

(Teddy's son) was in charge of the operation.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
8. RECOMMENDED READING: All the Shah's Men
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 02:34 PM
Aug 2013
All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror

With breezy storytelling and diligent research, Kinzer has reconstructed the CIA's 1953 overthrow of the elected leader of Iran, Mohammad Mossadegh, who was wildly popular at home for having nationalized his country's oil industry. The coup ushered in the long and brutal dictatorship of Mohammad Reza Shah, widely seen as a U.S. puppet and himself overthrown by the Islamic revolution of 1979. At its best this work reads like a spy novel, with code names and informants, midnight meetings with the monarch and a last-minute plot twist when the CIA's plan, called Operation Ajax, nearly goes awry. A veteran New York Times foreign correspondent and the author of books on Nicaragua (Blood of Brothers) and Turkey (Crescent and Star), Kinzer has combed memoirs, academic works, government documents and news stories to produce this blow-by-blow account. He shows that until early in 1953, Great Britain and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company were the imperialist baddies of this tale. Intransigent in the face of Iran's demands for a fairer share of oil profits and better conditions for workers, British Foreign Secretary Herbert Morrison exacerbated tension with his attitude that the challenge from Iran was, in Kinzer's words, "a simple matter of ignorant natives rebelling against the forces of civilization." Before the crisis peaked, a high-ranking employee of Anglo-Iranian wrote to a superior that the company's alliance with the "corrupt ruling classes" and "leech-like bureaucracies" were "disastrous, outdated and impractical." This stands as a textbook lesson in how not to conduct foreign policy.
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
10. Leakers
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 03:23 PM
Aug 2013

Damn leakers that finally own up to the bad things they did in the past, and everyone already knew they did.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The CIA Has Finally Admit...