Why Did The Guardian Omit So Many Important Facts Regarding Miranda?

[KittyWampus]

Last night we first saw the story as Greenwald's spouse detained for no other reason than being Greenwald's partner.

Why was their article not attributed to a specific author and just attributed to "staff"?

It sure looks like Greenwald wrote this story and INTENTIONALLY left out a lot of details for the sole purpose of stoking outrage.

[Harmony Blue]

1. If the article was an editorial

than it is listed as staff collaboration. A column is usually written by a columnist that is usually looked over by the head editor.

[quinnox]

2. Maybe you should do an investigation

[dipsydoodle]

3. Exactly which Guardian post do you mean ?

Last edited Mon Aug 19, 2013, 12:51 PM - Edit history (2)

This one ? http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/18/glenn-greenwald-guardian-partner-detained-heathrow

Their own staff means its not been pulled in from Reuters , AP, whoever and its not one of their blog writers. Not too difficult to understand when you consider the short distance between Heathrow and their offices in Kings Cross.

[muriel_volestrangler]

4. See here:

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10023483538

I think this answers the questions raised by your OP.

[leftstreet]

5. ROFL

You funneh!

[DisgustipatedinCA]

6. Are you not able to name these "facts" Greenwald omitted?

Or are you going with empty, vacuous accusations with no grounding in reality, again?