Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:47 AM Aug 2013

Would it have been okay for the UK to detain Greenwald or Poitras themselves?

I see a fair number of people suggesting that David Miranda was ferrying possibly classified information between Greenwald and Poitras, and this would make it acceptable for the UK authorities to detain him.

My question is, even if this were true, why would that make it okay? Suppose if it had been Greenwald himself or Poitras herself who had been traveling. Would it have been okay for the UK to detain them? Would this have been a legitimate use of government power, or would it have been an example of criminalizing journalism?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would it have been okay for the UK to detain Greenwald or Poitras themselves? (Original Post) BlueCheese Aug 2013 OP
It Is What They Could Expect To Happen, Sir, Crossing Many Borders The Magistrate Aug 2013 #1
No. Not under a terrorism act. This is getting absurd. morningfog Aug 2013 #2
Perfectly acceptable... HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #3
Like Snowden? LordGlenconner Aug 2013 #9
Why yes, yes he is... truebluegreen Aug 2013 #10
Yes. If the detention of Miranda is legal, then Greenwald and Poitras detention would also be legal msanthrope Aug 2013 #4
I do not agree with the detention of journalists. Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2013 #5
Germany probably did the surveillance for us. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #6
All of this is perfectly normal in totalitarian states. n/t Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #7
What you are asking is justification nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #8
Agree. truebluegreen Aug 2013 #11

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
1. It Is What They Could Expect To Happen, Sir, Crossing Many Borders
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:49 AM
Aug 2013

Note it was someone other than the principals making the run....

"I did what Custer should've, son --- I sent scouts."

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
3. Perfectly acceptable...
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 12:37 PM
Aug 2013

...in countries like Iran, Russia, and N Korea. ....and apparently for those authoritarian regimes and apologists who look to those countries as shining beacons on the hill.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
4. Yes. If the detention of Miranda is legal, then Greenwald and Poitras detention would also be legal
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 12:42 PM
Aug 2013

as there is no 1st amendment exception to criminal acts in the UK or in the US.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
5. I do not agree with the detention of journalists.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 12:42 PM
Aug 2013

Authorities are free to ask for a face to face where lawyers can be present. Get a search warrant if you want material.

I find it interesting he was detained in England instead of Germany -- England had the law in place to act as a fig leaf for this sort of thing, as well as the "close, personal relationship" with the US needed. Germany might be a little peeved at us right now and might have told the US to piss up a rope.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
8. What you are asking is justification
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 12:47 PM
Aug 2013

For the actions of authoritarian states. The calculus is how big of a shit stir it's going to be. They miscalculated.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
11. Agree.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 12:58 PM
Aug 2013

The administration seems to get more authoritarian and clueless / tone deaf on this issue every passing day.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would it have been okay f...