General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama and Fracking: "Driller-in-chief"?
President Obama is planning to tout his education plan when he visits upstate New York this week, beginning with an appearance in Buffalo todaybut much of his audience is likely to be interested in only one subject: fracking. Obama has, for the most part, been in favor of using frackingmore properly known as hydraulic fracturingto exploit the countrys huge resources of shale natural gas. In his 2012 State of the Union speech, Obama pledged to take every possible action to safely develop natural gas, promising that shale gas would add hundreds of thousands of jobs to the economy. And hes been true to his wordthe U.S. produced in 2012 8.13 trillion cubic ft. of natural gas from shale deposits, which requires fracking, nearly double the total from 2010, and the Energy Information Administration projects that by 2030 that figure could pass 14 trillion cubic ft. While the Environmental Protection Agency and the Interior Department are working on possibly stronger new national regulations of fracking, for the most part the natural gas industry has had its way under Obama. He may not have intended it when he entered the White House in 2009, but Obama really has been Americas driller-in-chief.
Thats exactly why protesters are likely to be out in force tomorrow in Buffalo, and even more so when Obama continues his visit to Binghamton, NY. Fracking remains controversial throughout the U.S., thanks to concerns over potential water contamination and pollution from wells, as well as fears that the new supplies of natural gas will bind the country more permanently to carbon-heavy fossil fuels. Ground zero for that emotional debate is New York state, which has both a massive potential reserve of shale gas and a determined community of environmentalists and activists working to ensure that fracking never happens in the Empire State. Were going to be present in Binghamton by the hundreds, if not the thousands, Walter Hang, the head of Ithaca-based Toxic Targeting, told WNYC.
In New York so far, environmentalists have been winning. For the past five years, the state has had a de-facto moratorium on fracking, while New Yorks Department of Environmental Conservation has carried out an extended review of the impacts of hydraulic fracturing, and more recently as New York Governor Andrew Cuomos health commissioner, Nirav Shah, reviews the health effects of fracking. Theres no word of when that will endShah told reporters back in May that a recommendation on fracking could be issued within weeks, but that has yet to come. While just across the border, drillers in Pennsylvania produced 1.5 trillion cubic ft. of natural gas using fracking through the first half of 2013, fracking is still on hold in New York as Cuomo makes up his mind.
Unlike Obama, the governor has said hes neutral on fracking, but it wont escape notice that Cuomo wont be accompanying Obama to Binghamton on Friday, a town at the heart of the fracking debate in New York. (Binghamton enacted a municipal moratorium on frackingone of a number of New York towns to do sothough the ban was struck down by a state Supreme Court justice last year.) Earlier this week Cuomo told The Capitol Pressroom, a public-radio program, that the Presidents point that fracking has economic benefits, energy benefits for this countrythats inarguable. But he questioned the environmental cost of the rush to shale gas:
Read more: http://science.time.com/2013/08/22/as-obama-visits-upstate-new-york-the-fracking-debate-takes-center-stage/#ixzz2chZEHeYq