General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWas The Guardian Forced To Smash A Hard Drive By British Intelligence?
True or False
1 vote, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes/True | |
1 (100%) |
|
No/False | |
0 (0%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)It was British Stupidity.
1awake
(1,494 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)The Guardian itself admits they did it in a "symbolic act".
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/20/nsa-snowden-files-drives-destroyed-london
Wilms
(26,795 posts)snip
This year, the U.K. ranked 29th on the freedom index compiled by watchdog group Reporters Without Borders, slightly higher than the U.S. but lower than places like Uruguay and Slovakia, as well as much of the rest of Europe.
Along with extremely strict libel and defamation laws, Britain also aims to prevent the publishing of government information through its Official Secrets Act, which in the past the British attorney general has threatened to use against the country's newspapers when they wanted to print embarrassing memos about the U.K.-U.S. relationship during the Iraq war. More recently, authorities have brought up the act in their attempts to get the Guardian to hand over the Snowden information and to put pressure on a whistleblower who exposed abuses within the Scotland Yard.
snip
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/08/why-the-british-government-forced-em-the-guardian-em-to-destroy-its-hard-drives/278919/
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Whacked really hard and rendered unusable? Yes.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)As the Brits would say, "Smashing".
then yes. Outcome was still the same whether they smashed it, smushed it, tossed it into a vat of burning oil or took a blow torch to it.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)To see how many people have been hood-winked? Or to see how many people you can hoodwink?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)boston bean
(36,219 posts)Guess we'll have to wait to see why apple produced a notebook with no hard drive.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)A mini-port MLC or SLC SSD drive is pretty standard equipment. It's nothing more than a flash drive with a mini-port interface. They are a hard drive in the sense that they are mass storage, but they don't have moving parts and aren't exactly identical to a 2.5" SSD drive.
Technology is different, functionality is essentially the same, though.
boston bean
(36,219 posts)to prove it was a notebook without a hard drive?
Because it looks like a card, but it's still mass storage.
ETA: I think we are straying from the point here. You asked me if there was such a thing as a Macbook pro that was made without a hard drive. Yes, there is, but it depends on what you consider a hard drive. You could say it was a flash drive, but it is directly seated in an M-Sata port and functions like a hard drive and is a mass storage device.
You can't just yank one from anything, though, and get data off of it due to BIOS variances and limitations of the standard.
I'm not sure what you really want to know, so I'm throwing in the kitchen sink of information I have for you.
boston bean
(36,219 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Not ALL. Please see the Intel 310 m-sata drive that I linked for you, including Tom's Hardware discussing it being installed in a MacBook Pro. Yes it's a hard drive. No, it isn't the normal, conventional hard drive that everyone thinks of when they think of a hard drive.
It's mass storage.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)Same thing. Superfast, quiet as all get out. Personally I'll never buy another computer with a spinning hard disk. Anyway, what he said: same thing functionally, if not technologically.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But yes, same functionality, different technological format.
And AMEN. Superior in all ways to a spinning disk in power consumption and speed.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)Shoulda guessed that by the icon.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Now you know!
boston bean
(36,219 posts)Nor does anything you are saying prove that a hard drive was not destroyed.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But I'll clarify with this statement:
Your definition of what a hard drive is may be different from mine. Let's put it this way.
"A mass data storage device was destroyed". That's my view.
(and it really isn't semantics, it's calling tech by it's proper name)
Not that either of those ideas are here nor there in a political conversation. Bottom line, they seized his laptop and destroyed his mass storage device, hard drive, Half-Life 2 gaming repository, whatever you choose to call it. Effect is still the same.
boston bean
(36,219 posts)and the guardian said a hard drive was destroyed. So, where's that leave us. In my mindd, a hard drive was destroyed. Let's move on, nothing else makes a difference, imho.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I don't know where this idea of "it's not a hard drive" came in, because for all practical purposes, the effect is the same. They took his laptop, and destroyed the mass storage device in it. End of story. I don't care if there were carrier pigeons inside transmitting the data.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)But less confusing for users, except when it isn't, like now.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)It's not a "drive". It's a solid state mass storage device with an m-sata interface. No one that isn't aware of hardware changes would recognize it as a "hard drive". Not even if they used an SSD.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And small, cooler, and efficient.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and quick as lightning over the interface .
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Mainly for travel and WiFi use. It cooks.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)The problem is with the number of times a particular segment of flash memory can be written before it fails. But this is improving and the speed trade-off makes the choice almost a no-brainer, the other problem is cost: hard disks are much cheaper, particularly for larger sizes. 1TB SSD disks are very expensive.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I don't remember the details, it's been a couple years, but thousands of writes. As long as they have relocation for bad sectors, you can go on a long time that way, disc drives do ...
But yeah, not for servers or busy situations. Yet anyway. And a bit slow to write. But I do write once, read many, mostly, like a lot of people.
Edit: and you want to turn off swap space ...
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)NSA files: why the Guardian in London destroyed hard drives of leaked files
A threat of legal action by the government that could have stopped reporting on the files leaked by Edward Snowden led to a symbolic act at the Guardian's offices in London
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/20/nsa-snowden-files-drives-destroyed-london
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Just trying to follow.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)A threat of legal action by the government that could have stopped reporting on the files leaked by Edward Snowden led to a symbolic act at the Guardian's offices in London
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/20/nsa-snowden-files-drives-destroyed-london
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)People will believe whatever they want to believe.
We are now in a post-fact society.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Why?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)vignettes and blackouts!
boston bean
(36,219 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Scores of netbooks are manufactured with one of these:
http://www.amazon.com/Generic-KingSpec-Mini-PCIE-msata-128GB/dp/B00BVYHDNG
That's a 128 GB one.
boston bean
(36,219 posts)Macbook pro's are made with a hard drive.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)they are all small highly portable laptops. m-sata is well recognized and is an industry standard. It's nothing outrageous in the slightest, just a different technology that serves the same purpose.
"One mSATA product is Intels 310 series SSD, and you will also find the same physical drive format in Apples MacBook Pro "
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/msata-ssd-flash,2948.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-ssd-310-msata-mini-solid-state-drive,2854.html
boston bean
(36,219 posts)but really, is it that important that you and I has this out here?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)The net effect is the same. His data was destroyed when they destroyed whatever physical entity it happened to reside on, and that isn't right.
Occasionally I get overly technical, but I think we are in agreement. I was trying to help clarify things, and it appears I made it muddier LOL.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Did this whole thread boil down to "it didn't look like a mass storage device to me (like a laptop hard drive) so one wasn't destroyed?"
If that's your best argument, I recommend you visit a tech site or two and quit playing games.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)They've gone from half hearted defense of the indefensible to just plain old derp, but with renewed enthusiasm.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Still doesn't make it less ridiculous.