HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Obama’s Guns of August - ...

Sat Aug 24, 2013, 05:57 PM

Obama’s Guns of August - From Slate

http://mobile.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2013/08/barack_obama_s_logic_for_bombing_syria_the_united_states_will_seek_to_put.html

A good read, and worth the click.

Snips:
"It seems likely that President Obama will bomb Syria sometime in the coming weeks.

His top civilian and military advisers are meeting in the White House on Saturday to discuss options. American warships are heading toward the area; those already there, at least one of which had been scheduled for a port call, are standing by. Most telling perhaps is a story in the New York Times, noting that Obama’s national-security aides are studying the 1999 air war in Kosovo as a possible blueprint for action in Syria.

In that conflict 14 years ago, ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, an autonomous province of Serbia, were being massacred by Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic. President Bill Clinton, after much reluctance, decided to intervene, but couldn’t get authorization from the U.N. Security Council, where Russia—Serbia’s main ally—was certain to veto any resolution on the use of force. So Clinton turned to NATO, an appropriate instrument to deal with a crisis in the middle of Europe."


Much more at the link.

3 replies, 1278 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Obama’s Guns of August - From Slate (Original post)
riqster Aug 2013 OP
David__77 Aug 2013 #1
riqster Aug 2013 #2
David__77 Aug 2013 #3

Response to riqster (Original post)

Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:08 PM

1. Fred Kaplan WISHES.

He wants US treasure to be spend supporting terrorism in Syria, but there are no indications that Obama is seriously considering such a move, which would of course destroy his presidency.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to David__77 (Reply #1)

Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:11 PM

2. I'm not sure about that. Action or inaction could fuck his shit up.

A big fucking mess no matter what we do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riqster (Reply #2)

Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:20 PM

3. Not intervening is best for Obama politically. No doubt.

In fact, doing everything possible to force the opposition to the table with Assad would be a winning situation. It would defuse the insurgency by taking the wind out of its sails, and make it more likely for Russia and Iran to agree to a solution as well. There is zero popular demand for the US to "own" the Syria conflict. But once the US touches it, it owns it for all history.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread