Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:56 AM Aug 2013

Will we ever want to have sex with robots ?

yes, the original headline.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23637225



Meet Roxxxy the sex robot with a triple XXX. Depending on your view 'she' is either at the cutting edge of the human-robot interface, or a modern reflection on some men's difficulties in relating to real-life partners.

While sex aids are nothing new, what makes Roxxxy different is "we've taken artificial intelligence" and "combined it with a human form," says creator Douglas Hines.

Of course, humanoid robots have been the stuff of science fiction for decades - ever since Fritz Lang's 1927 film Metropolis, or Isaac Asimov's I Robot stories.

The reality is somewhat more clunky.

113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will we ever want to have sex with robots ? (Original Post) steve2470 Aug 2013 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #1
Warren, it's only nasty objectification if men do it. nt Bonobo Aug 2013 #4
If it was attached to a creepy pseudo-man wickerwoman Aug 2013 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #100
plenty of men seem to like sex with unconcious women Skittles Aug 2013 #2
those men get an ASSKICKING steve2470 Aug 2013 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #5
you think a vibrator is a robot? Skittles Aug 2013 #6
If I were a robot, I would be equipped with one. Lasher Aug 2013 #7
you get it; those two do NOT Skittles Aug 2013 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #34
or the same as having "sex" with unconscious women? BainsBane Aug 2013 #13
that analogy just went right over your head Skittles Aug 2013 #15
Excuse me? BainsBane Aug 2013 #16
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #25
Mommy issues? BainsBane Aug 2013 #28
aw, done here Skittles Aug 2013 #30
I would understand being attacked for disagreeing with someone BainsBane Aug 2013 #32
Careful, Skittles. Bonobo Aug 2013 #59
WTF? BainsBane Aug 2013 #64
Are you sure it wasn't because of a martyrdom complex or a bizarre paranoia rather than sexism? LanternWaste Aug 2013 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #92
I did not try to have him booted BainsBane Aug 2013 #94
You obviously haven't followed my point BainsBane Aug 2013 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #19
I didn't claim to know what you meant BainsBane Aug 2013 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #31
FFS BainsBane Aug 2013 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #36
lol steve2470 Aug 2013 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #20
here ya go Skittles Aug 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #24
I don't consider using a vibrator to be sex BainsBane Aug 2013 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #38
give or take another human being BainsBane Aug 2013 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #43
It depends on how the person perceives it BainsBane Aug 2013 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #47
Wtf ? You've removed masturbation from thngs to do that are having sex? Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #57
If using it with a partner, sure BainsBane Aug 2013 #63
does it matter if it's an inny or an outy? snooper2 Aug 2013 #75
WTF? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2013 #78
A guy bought one who talked when you pressed a button on her neck dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #8
Heh heh Lasher Aug 2013 #10
I don't think it will get locked steve2470 Aug 2013 #12
Yes LearningCurve Aug 2013 #9
your own ? JI7 Aug 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #27
Of course LearningCurve Aug 2013 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #50
Roxxxy, Klaatu barada nikto. nt longship Aug 2013 #11
But will we respect it in the morning? KansDem Aug 2013 #26
only if it obeyed all applicable robot-human sex laws steve2470 Aug 2013 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #40
Android brothels: robot prostitutes could replace humans by 2050 steve2470 Aug 2013 #41
yes the whole robot human sex thing is very weird nt steve2470 Aug 2013 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #45
I can see the robot-human sex thing for certain um subsets of the population steve2470 Aug 2013 #48
Macho, macho bot! I want to be a macho bot! radicalliberal Aug 2013 #42
It will take off once they are more realistic madville Aug 2013 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #53
But will you respect yourself in the morning? Orrex Aug 2013 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #74
Well, then you can go screw yourself. Orrex Aug 2013 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #82
Jesus, Warren, you're killing me here. I've spewed soda all over my monitor. Nay Aug 2013 #111
LOL MountainMama Aug 2013 #89
If they made them like the sexbots in A.I., maybe. LuvNewcastle Aug 2013 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #55
Oh, I think the Summer model would be popular indeed. LuvNewcastle Aug 2013 #56
something which defines us humans PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #54
only if she isn't as mouthy Niceguy1 Aug 2013 #58
That's not a bug -- it's a feature! Buns_of_Fire Aug 2013 #66
I thought that's what "Twilight" was about? n/t Scootaloo Aug 2013 #60
Owners will also be able to select different personalities .., from "Wild Wendy" to "Frigid Farrah," jakeXT Aug 2013 #61
Let me know when the Johnny Depp model is available! VanillaRhapsody Aug 2013 #79
I suspect they will have human operators. hunter Aug 2013 #85
What if the robot gets pregnant? liberal N proud Aug 2013 #62
I must say he does look very real that robot. dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #65
I think that the answer is an obvious yes` Orrex Aug 2013 #67
last robotic bump nt steve2470 Aug 2013 #69
What about when robots of the future want sex with us? RedCloud Aug 2013 #70
Consider the robot as a large dildo, and I think you can answer that question n/t Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #71
This is something many think is very possible in the future davidn3600 Aug 2013 #72
as the song goes, "Imaginary lovers never let you down." Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #73
What do you say to friends & family when they come to your house E-Z-B Aug 2013 #76
Who wants to yodel in the Uncanny Valley? kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #80
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #105
That is a really strange headline. ZombieHorde Aug 2013 #81
I remember her from the Bush Administration... hunter Aug 2013 #83
Yikes. MyshkinCommaPrince Aug 2013 #84
On the bright side, maybe the guys over at Free Republic will finally get laid E-Z-B Aug 2013 #86
Remember "Cherry 2000" Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #87
I doubt that it will catch on whoiswithme Aug 2013 #88
LOL MountainMama Aug 2013 #90
I certainly hope to never meet anyone who wants to. LanternWaste Aug 2013 #93
Hard to say, but if I'm ever stranded on a desert island with Ann Coulter and ... 11 Bravo Aug 2013 #95
haha too funny DUzy worthy ! nt steve2470 Aug 2013 #97
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #103
if its better than ones partner at sex then it sure as hell will be used loli phabay Aug 2013 #96
Gives a whole new meaning to "first person shooter". wickerwoman Aug 2013 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #104
Cherry 2000 KG Aug 2013 #101
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #102
just get an orb napkinz Aug 2013 #106
Valerie 23 John1956PA Aug 2013 #107
I don't think robots would get headaches. That could be an advantage. (n/t) spin Aug 2013 #108
Of course. Practically everyone Shankapotomus Aug 2013 #109
If we're talking cylon, I'm game BainsBane Aug 2013 #110
Not until I figure out the seashells anyway. n/t hootinholler Aug 2013 #112
Don't Date Robots! hunter Aug 2013 #113

Response to steve2470 (Original post)

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
99. If it was attached to a creepy pseudo-man
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 05:50 AM
Aug 2013

that said things like "Let me open that jar for you" or "I'll mow your lawn any day of the week."

It's not the jerking off that's gross. It's using a clearly fake whole person programmed to say things people of your gender are stereotypically supposed to get off on that's nasty.

Response to wickerwoman (Reply #99)

Response to Skittles (Reply #2)

Response to Lasher (Reply #7)

Response to BainsBane (Reply #16)

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
28. Mommy issues?
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:21 AM
Aug 2013

Not only have you not tried to understand my point, but you are being deliberately rude for no reason.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
32. I would understand being attacked for disagreeing with someone
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:23 AM
Aug 2013

but not when I agree and you can't be bothered to figure that out.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
59. Careful, Skittles.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 07:45 AM
Aug 2013

When BB develops a dislike for you, she does not let go.

I have been here for over a decade and she tried to have me booted off DU recently because she thinks I am a sexist.

So she joined hands with the Republicrats to get rid of me.

Tread lightly.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
91. Are you sure it wasn't because of a martyrdom complex or a bizarre paranoia rather than sexism?
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:18 PM
Aug 2013

"she tried to have me booted off DU recently because she thinks I am a sexist...."

Are you sure it wasn't because of a martyrdom complex or simple paranoia rather than sexism?

Response to LanternWaste (Reply #91)

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
94. I did not try to have him booted
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:25 PM
Aug 2013

at all. I responded NMI to his post and suggested a friend might have a word with him so he didn't end up being banned.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
17. You obviously haven't followed my point
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:06 AM
Aug 2013

Last edited Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:40 AM - Edit history (1)

Mine was a comment on Warren's remark to you about vibrators, as though that somehow equated with rape of an unconscious woman. Now why you think something about rape would go over MY head I can't imagine. I post more about violence against women than virtually anyone on this site.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #17)

Response to BainsBane (Reply #23)

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
33. FFS
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:25 AM
Aug 2013

It wasn't about you. I was trying to explain my point to Skittles, which is obviously a lost cause.
The "as though" was a reference to my comment on her reply to you.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #33)

Response to BainsBane (Reply #13)

Response to Skittles (Reply #6)

Skittles

(153,138 posts)
22. here ya go
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:18 AM
Aug 2013

ro·bot
ˈrōˌbätˈrōbətSubmit
noun
1.
a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically, esp. one programmable by a computer.
synonyms: automaton, android, golem;

Response to Skittles (Reply #22)

Response to BainsBane (Reply #35)

Response to BainsBane (Reply #39)

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
46. It depends on how the person perceives it
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:34 AM
Aug 2013

for me, a robot would be masturbation. I think some men might see it as a sex.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #46)

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
57. Wtf ? You've removed masturbation from thngs to do that are having sex?
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 07:32 AM
Aug 2013

That is pretty peculiar. Plenty of women use a vibrator while with their partner, either before, during or after the actual sequence of events where a penis (if the partner has one of those) is in a vagina. Does that count?

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
8. A guy bought one who talked when you pressed a button on her neck
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 05:22 AM
Aug 2013

She only ever said one thing - "I've got a headache"

Response to JI7 (Reply #21)

Response to LearningCurve (Reply #49)

Response to steve2470 (Reply #29)

Response to steve2470 (Reply #44)

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
48. I can see the robot-human sex thing for certain um subsets of the population
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:37 AM
Aug 2013

The subsets who cannot/will not/should not engage with humans. Still creepy but different strokes and all that.

madville

(7,408 posts)
51. It will take off once they are more realistic
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:43 AM
Aug 2013

And not neccesarily for sex, male or female models could do many other tasks as well like cleaning, laundry, cooking, yard work, etc.

Kind of like having an assistant or a clone of one's self, sounds kind of neat.

Response to madville (Reply #51)

Response to Orrex (Reply #68)

Response to Orrex (Reply #77)

Nay

(12,051 posts)
111. Jesus, Warren, you're killing me here. I've spewed soda all over my monitor.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 11:15 AM
Aug 2013


Are you on some sort of funny meds???

LuvNewcastle

(16,843 posts)
52. If they made them like the sexbots in A.I., maybe.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 07:05 AM
Aug 2013

I wouldn't mind having one of those Jude Law bots here around the house.

Response to LuvNewcastle (Reply #52)

LuvNewcastle

(16,843 posts)
56. Oh, I think the Summer model would be popular indeed.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 07:22 AM
Aug 2013

Just think how much some of those stars would make from selling the rights to build sexbots. They would put the action figures in the shade.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
54. something which defines us humans
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 07:08 AM
Aug 2013
While no machine, however well-engineered, can ever feel empathy - something which defines us humans - it might be able to simulate it well enough to allow us to play along and treat it as if it were a sentient being.


There are plenty of "humans" which do not appear to have this trait.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,173 posts)
66. That's not a bug -- it's a feature!
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 08:24 AM
Aug 2013

However, if you insist, they can disable the "mouthy" feature and give you a credit towards more... uh, "interesting"... options. Like maybe replacing the operating system with one that all but eliminates the dreaded "blue stare of death."

How do you do a "ctrl-alt-delete", I wonder?

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
61. Owners will also be able to select different personalities .., from "Wild Wendy" to "Frigid Farrah,"
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 07:59 AM
Aug 2013
"Sex only goes so far – then you want to be able to talk to the person," Hines said.

The phrases that were demonstrated were prerecorded, but the robot will also be able to synthesize phrases out of prerecorded words and sounds, Hines said. The laptop will receive updates over the Internet to expand the robot's capabilities and vocabulary. Since Hines is a soccer fan, it can already discuss Manchester United, he said. It snores, too.

Owners will also be able to select different personalities for Roxxxy, from "Wild Wendy" to "Frigid Farrah," Hines said. He's charging somewhere from $7,000 to $9,000 for the robot, including the laptop, and expects to start shipping in a few months.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/10/roxxxy-sex-robot-photo-wo_n_417976.html

hunter

(38,309 posts)
85. I suspect they will have human operators.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 03:53 PM
Aug 2013

Think working for a phone sex line is bad?

Imagine your 9-5 job was putting on a motion capture suit, telepresence goggles, and controlling a sex-bot on the other side of the world...

Orrex

(63,191 posts)
67. I think that the answer is an obvious yes`
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 09:12 AM
Aug 2013

Not my cup of tea, but there enough "simulator" products out there to suggest that a robot would be warmly welcomed by a certain market.

RedCloud

(9,230 posts)
70. What about when robots of the future want sex with us?
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 12:25 PM
Aug 2013

Will they use their powerful brainwash waves to make us say yes?

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
72. This is something many think is very possible in the future
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 12:36 PM
Aug 2013

That if we have robots that have advanced artificial intelligence and they look like humans, that we may develop feelings and emotions for such machines.

Already look at how some guys fall in love with their car or the guns or whatever. People become attached to inanimate objects just as easily as living beings.

E-Z-B

(567 posts)
76. What do you say to friends & family when they come to your house
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 02:55 PM
Aug 2013

And see one of these things sitting on your couch?

Response to kenny blankenship (Reply #80)

MyshkinCommaPrince

(611 posts)
84. Yikes.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 03:53 PM
Aug 2013

I watched the BBC documentary on "Real Dolls", and man. I came away freaked out by that. Just, eep. It was when I learned the true meaning of Uncanny Valley. I recall Robert Anton Wilson promoting the idea of Marilyn Monroe sex robots or something. He seemed to like the idea. It just makes me shudder.

 

whoiswithme

(35 posts)
88. I doubt that it will catch on
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:05 PM
Aug 2013

I have always wondered why aids for men to pleasure themselves haven't caught on, like the fleshlight. Seems like it can't be too hard to make a device to simulate sex, but most men don't seem interested in that. I have even wondered if there is a way to use virtual reality to simulate touch and accomplish the same thing. Seems better to me than blowing a bunch of money on beer at a bar and taking a chance of going home with someone that may not look as good the next morning. I think it will take a lot more technology to simulate the real thing. Besides, who wants sloppy seconds on a robot?

MountainMama

(237 posts)
90. LOL
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:14 PM
Aug 2013

The correct answer is: Of course!

My husband says a couple of things, while sort of sad, are probably true:

1. When new technology becomes available, if it can be used for porn, it'll be wildly successful, and:
2. Men don't pay hookers for sex--they pay them to leave (not his original thought, IMS).

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
93. I certainly hope to never meet anyone who wants to.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:24 PM
Aug 2013

I certainly hope to never meet anyone who wants to.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
95. Hard to say, but if I'm ever stranded on a desert island with Ann Coulter and ...
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:28 PM
Aug 2013

a robot, I hope I have some WD-40 in my survival kit.

Response to 11 Bravo (Reply #95)

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
96. if its better than ones partner at sex then it sure as hell will be used
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:33 PM
Aug 2013

Hope the things rechargeable or it will only be a few hours of life.

Response to wickerwoman (Reply #98)

Response to steve2470 (Original post)

John1956PA

(2,654 posts)
107. Valerie 23
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 06:16 AM
Aug 2013

Last edited Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:16 PM - Edit history (2)

The second episode of the new Outer Limits television series (1995-2002) was "Valerie 23." Said episode title refers to the newest version of a line of "female" automatons developed by a robotic engineer. The premises of the episode is that the engineer loans Valerie to his friend Frank as sort of a test to determine the limit of personal interaction which can be possible between humans and automatons. The summary of the episode is found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_23

From the Wikipedia link:

Over the course of the test, Valerie becomes increasingly affectionate and Frank eventually gives in. After the sexual encounter, Frank explains to Valerie that he thinks it was a mistake.






Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
109. Of course. Practically everyone
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 07:06 AM
Aug 2013

assumes a robot relationship should be about sex. Depending on a person's ability for personal introspection and level of deprivation, such a relationship could just as easily be primarily about intellectual companionship.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will we ever want to have...