General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill we ever want to have sex with robots ?
yes, the original headline.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23637225
Meet Roxxxy the sex robot with a triple XXX. Depending on your view 'she' is either at the cutting edge of the human-robot interface, or a modern reflection on some men's difficulties in relating to real-life partners.
While sex aids are nothing new, what makes Roxxxy different is "we've taken artificial intelligence" and "combined it with a human form," says creator Douglas Hines.
Of course, humanoid robots have been the stuff of science fiction for decades - ever since Fritz Lang's 1927 film Metropolis, or Isaac Asimov's I Robot stories.
The reality is somewhat more clunky.
Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)that said things like "Let me open that jar for you" or "I'll mow your lawn any day of the week."
It's not the jerking off that's gross. It's using a clearly fake whole person programmed to say things people of your gender are stereotypically supposed to get off on that's nasty.
Response to wickerwoman (Reply #99)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)not much difference, I would say
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Response to Skittles (Reply #2)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)Lasher
(27,553 posts)Yes indeed.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)Response to Lasher (Reply #7)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Skittles
(153,138 posts)big surprise
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Why so hostile?
Response to BainsBane (Reply #16)
Post removed
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Not only have you not tried to understand my point, but you are being deliberately rude for no reason.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)this isn't even entertaining
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)but not when I agree and you can't be bothered to figure that out.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)When BB develops a dislike for you, she does not let go.
I have been here for over a decade and she tried to have me booted off DU recently because she thinks I am a sexist.
So she joined hands with the Republicrats to get rid of me.
Tread lightly.
That is a completely unfounded allegation and totally false.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"she tried to have me booted off DU recently because she thinks I am a sexist...."
Are you sure it wasn't because of a martyrdom complex or simple paranoia rather than sexism?
Response to LanternWaste (Reply #91)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)at all. I responded NMI to his post and suggested a friend might have a word with him so he didn't end up being banned.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:40 AM - Edit history (1)
Mine was a comment on Warren's remark to you about vibrators, as though that somehow equated with rape of an unconscious woman. Now why you think something about rape would go over MY head I can't imagine. I post more about violence against women than virtually anyone on this site.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #17)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)I referred to what you said and explained what I meant.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #23)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)It wasn't about you. I was trying to explain my point to Skittles, which is obviously a lost cause.
The "as though" was a reference to my comment on her reply to you.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #33)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Response to BainsBane (Reply #13)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Skittles (Reply #6)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)ro·bot
ˈrōˌbätˈrōbətSubmit
noun
1.
a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically, esp. one programmable by a computer.
synonyms: automaton, android, golem;
Response to Skittles (Reply #22)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Masturbation and sex aren't the same thing.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #35)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Is your wife a semantic quibble?
Response to BainsBane (Reply #39)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)for me, a robot would be masturbation. I think some men might see it as a sex.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #46)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)That is pretty peculiar. Plenty of women use a vibrator while with their partner, either before, during or after the actual sequence of events where a penis (if the partner has one of those) is in a vagina. Does that count?
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)but that isn't the context of this discussion, obviously.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You have a very narrow definition then...
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)She only ever said one thing - "I've got a headache"
Lasher
(27,553 posts)This one will be epic if it doesn't get locked.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 26, 2013, 06:08 AM - Edit history (1)
Fergawdssake, we've discussed pubic hair and its grooming in GD.
eta: "Please, no more threads about chicken."
LearningCurve
(488 posts)I've had sex with a sock puppet.
JI7
(89,244 posts)Response to JI7 (Reply #21)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
LearningCurve
(488 posts)I'm not a pervert!
Response to LearningCurve (Reply #49)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
longship
(40,416 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)Response to steve2470 (Reply #29)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)Response to steve2470 (Reply #44)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)The subsets who cannot/will not/should not engage with humans. Still creepy but different strokes and all that.
radicalliberal
(907 posts)[img][/img]
[img][/img]
madville
(7,408 posts)And not neccesarily for sex, male or female models could do many other tasks as well like cleaning, laundry, cooking, yard work, etc.
Kind of like having an assistant or a clone of one's self, sounds kind of neat.
Response to madville (Reply #51)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Orrex
(63,191 posts)Response to Orrex (Reply #68)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Orrex
(63,191 posts)So to speak.
Response to Orrex (Reply #77)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nay
(12,051 posts)Are you on some sort of funny meds???
MountainMama
(237 posts)ROFL!!!! You, sir, rock.
LuvNewcastle
(16,843 posts)I wouldn't mind having one of those Jude Law bots here around the house.
Response to LuvNewcastle (Reply #52)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
LuvNewcastle
(16,843 posts)Just think how much some of those stars would make from selling the rights to build sexbots. They would put the action figures in the shade.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)There are plenty of "humans" which do not appear to have this trait.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)As my girlfriend, lol
Buns_of_Fire
(17,173 posts)However, if you insist, they can disable the "mouthy" feature and give you a credit towards more... uh, "interesting"... options. Like maybe replacing the operating system with one that all but eliminates the dreaded "blue stare of death."
How do you do a "ctrl-alt-delete", I wonder?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)The phrases that were demonstrated were prerecorded, but the robot will also be able to synthesize phrases out of prerecorded words and sounds, Hines said. The laptop will receive updates over the Internet to expand the robot's capabilities and vocabulary. Since Hines is a soccer fan, it can already discuss Manchester United, he said. It snores, too.
Owners will also be able to select different personalities for Roxxxy, from "Wild Wendy" to "Frigid Farrah," Hines said. He's charging somewhere from $7,000 to $9,000 for the robot, including the laptop, and expects to start shipping in a few months.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/10/roxxxy-sex-robot-photo-wo_n_417976.html
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)hunter
(38,309 posts)Think working for a phone sex line is bad?
Imagine your 9-5 job was putting on a motion capture suit, telepresence goggles, and controlling a sex-bot on the other side of the world...
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Will the baby be a robot or a human?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Orrex
(63,191 posts)Not my cup of tea, but there enough "simulator" products out there to suggest that a robot would be warmly welcomed by a certain market.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)RedCloud
(9,230 posts)Will they use their powerful brainwash waves to make us say yes?
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)That if we have robots that have advanced artificial intelligence and they look like humans, that we may develop feelings and emotions for such machines.
Already look at how some guys fall in love with their car or the guns or whatever. People become attached to inanimate objects just as easily as living beings.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)E-Z-B
(567 posts)And see one of these things sitting on your couch?
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Not me.
Response to kenny blankenship (Reply #80)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)It should read: "Will we ever not want to have sex with robots?"
hunter
(38,309 posts)MyshkinCommaPrince
(611 posts)I watched the BBC documentary on "Real Dolls", and man. I came away freaked out by that. Just, eep. It was when I learned the true meaning of Uncanny Valley. I recall Robert Anton Wilson promoting the idea of Marilyn Monroe sex robots or something. He seemed to like the idea. It just makes me shudder.
E-Z-B
(567 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)whoiswithme
(35 posts)I have always wondered why aids for men to pleasure themselves haven't caught on, like the fleshlight. Seems like it can't be too hard to make a device to simulate sex, but most men don't seem interested in that. I have even wondered if there is a way to use virtual reality to simulate touch and accomplish the same thing. Seems better to me than blowing a bunch of money on beer at a bar and taking a chance of going home with someone that may not look as good the next morning. I think it will take a lot more technology to simulate the real thing. Besides, who wants sloppy seconds on a robot?
MountainMama
(237 posts)The correct answer is: Of course!
My husband says a couple of things, while sort of sad, are probably true:
1. When new technology becomes available, if it can be used for porn, it'll be wildly successful, and:
2. Men don't pay hookers for sex--they pay them to leave (not his original thought, IMS).
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I certainly hope to never meet anyone who wants to.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)a robot, I hope I have some WD-40 in my survival kit.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Response to 11 Bravo (Reply #95)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Hope the things rechargeable or it will only be a few hours of life.
wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)Response to wickerwoman (Reply #98)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
KG
(28,751 posts)Response to steve2470 (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)John1956PA
(2,654 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:16 PM - Edit history (2)
The second episode of the new Outer Limits television series (1995-2002) was "Valerie 23." Said episode title refers to the newest version of a line of "female" automatons developed by a robotic engineer. The premises of the episode is that the engineer loans Valerie to his friend Frank as sort of a test to determine the limit of personal interaction which can be possible between humans and automatons. The summary of the episode is found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_23
From the Wikipedia link:
spin
(17,493 posts)Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)assumes a robot relationship should be about sex. Depending on a person's ability for personal introspection and level of deprivation, such a relationship could just as easily be primarily about intellectual companionship.