Indiscriminate surveillance fosters distrust, conformity and mediocrity: research

[xchrom]

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/08/26/indiscriminate-surveillance-fosters-distrust-conformity-and-mediocrity-research/




Recent disclosures about the scope of government surveillance are staggering. We now know that the UK’s Tempora program records huge volumes of private communications, including – as standard – our emails, social networking activity, internet histories, and telephone calls. Much of this data is then shared with the US National Security Agency, which operates its own (formerly) clandestine surveillance operation. Similar programs are believed to operate in Russia, China, India, and throughout several European countries. While pundits have argued vigorously about the merits and drawbacks of such programs, the voice of science has remained relatively quiet. This is despite the fact that science, alone, can lay claim to a wealth of empirical evidence on the psychological effects of surveillance. Studying that evidence leads to a clear conclusion and a warning: indiscriminate intelligence-gathering presents a grave risk to our mental health, productivity, social cohesion, and ultimately our future.

Surveillance impairs mental health and performance

For more than 15 years we’ve known that surveillance leads to heightened levels of stress, fatigue and anxiety. In the workplace it also reduces performance and our sense of personal control. A government that engages in mass surveillance cannot claim to value the wellbeing or productivity of its citizens.

Surveillance promotes distrust between the public and the state


People will trust an authority to the extent that it is seen to behave in their interest and trust them in return. Research suggests that people tolerate limited surveillance provided they believe their security is being bought with someone else’s liberty. The moment it becomes clear that they are in fact trading their own liberty, the social contract is broken. Violating this trust changes the definition of “us” and “them” in a way that can be dangerous for a democratic authority – suddenly, most of the population stands in opposition to their own government.

[SamKnause]

1. Surveillance

Those who should be under surveillance 24/7..................................................................

Politicians; corrupt people who implement the laws of our corporate overlords

Wall Street; inside traders and ponzi scheme operators

Military Brass; those responsible for empire building the world over

Supreme Court; paid puppets that enact legislation that protects corporations over the needs and wants of this country and it's people

All watch dog groups whose sole purpose is to protect the rights of we the people

Our militarized police; they should be forced to wear cameras with audio at all times

Judges; a country with a corrupt justice system can not function properly

Chamber of Commerce; an organization this country would be wise to get rid of

The Federal Reserve; self explanatory

Lobbyists; paid shills that have destroyed our government and election process

Maybe, just maybe if we could get these groups to be held accountable we could turn this country around.

[Supersedeas]

2. and it is your loyal, patriotic duty to continue shopping