General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNorman Solomon: What the Assault on Whistleblowers Has to Do With War on Syria
What the Assault on Whistleblowers Has to Do With War on Syriaby Norman Solomon * Wednesday, August 28, 2013 * Common Dreams
Without whistleblowers, the mainline media outlets are more transfixed than ever with telling the official story. And at a time like this, the official story is all about spinning for war on Syria.
Every president who wants to launch another war cant abide whistleblowers. They might interfere with the careful omissions, distortions and outright lies of war propaganda, which requires that truth be held in a kind of preventative detention.
By mid-week, media adrenalin was at fever pitch as news reports cited high-level sources explaining when the U.S. missile attacks on Syria were likely to begin, how long they might last, what their goals would be. But what about other (potential) sources who have documents and other information that contradict the official story?
Its never easy for whistleblowers to take the risk of exposing secret realities. At times like these, its especially difficultand especially vitalfor whistleblowers to take the chance.
When independent journalist I.F. Stone said All governments lie and nothing they say should be believed, he was warning against the automatic acceptance of any government claim. That warning becomes most crucial when a launch of war is imminent. Thats when, more than ever, we need whistleblowers who can leak information that refutes the official line.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/08/28-0
Howler
(4,225 posts)Thank you 99th Monkey!!! This is what I'm seeing!
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Thank you Howler, for "keeping it lit"
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Howler
(4,225 posts)K&R
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Without investigative journalists and whistleblowers, all we are left with is the propaganda machine.
This is how the worst crimes against humanity are not only permitted to proceed, but are rewritten as Necessary.
Thank you.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)as my friends in the UK would put it.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Bollocks!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norman-solomon/the-whistleblower-who-tri_b_129133.html
Look at that! She's even from the UK.
randome
(34,845 posts)It's all about the prices of bananas, don't you know? See? Anyone can play this game.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
Civilization2
(649 posts)War is for profits. the 1% need more cash,. .
Hydra
(14,459 posts)They want to control the narrative. No inconvenient interruptions like Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, Joe Wilson or David Kelly.
In their minds, everything will be "perfect" when we all only have access to their BS. I agree with them- it will be "perfectly f***ed up."
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)Here's how you do it.
Make a large sign that states,
HONK
NO WAR
IN SYRIA
and stand at a busy corner in your town or city, if this was done right now all over the country, the message would be heard loud and clear.
It would be reported because the sound would be deafening.
excellent points
Howler
(4,225 posts)On the Occupier's protests and now Turn it up by the power of ten because that is whats coming!!
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)that has been foisted on us by at least two presidents now.
Why can't I be wrong at least some of the time?
Howler
(4,225 posts)I really REALLy do 99th Monkey...... but I'm afraid there is no such luck.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 29, 2013, 10:12 PM - Edit history (1)
GOAL: 25,000
CURRENT: 21,836
Check it out.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 31, 2013, 10:45 AM - Edit history (2)
CURRENT: CURRENT: 28,144
GOAL: 40,000
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)...With war at the top of Washingtons agenda, this is a time to make our voices heard. (To email your senators and representative, expressing opposition to an attack on Syria, click here.) A loud and sustained outcry against the war momentum is essentialand so is support for whistleblowers.
Prevent an Attack on Syria Now
GOAL: 75,000
CURRENT: 40,705
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)CURRENT: 71,631
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Including the fact that the intelligence is 'no slam dunk' and that "no evidence Assad ordered it."
So, it looks like someone is leaking/whistleblowing.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)to the apparent supply chain for the chemical weapons (sans instructions on how to use).
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Published on Sunday, September 1, 2013 by Common Dreams
Obama Will Launch a Huge Propaganda Blitz -- and May Attack Syria Even If He Loses the Vote in Congress
by Norman Solomon
<>
President Obama and top Democrats such as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi will twist every arm they can to get a yes vote for attacking Syria. Meanwhile, most mainline media pundits, numbingly addicted to war, will often chastise and denigrate foes of authorization.
But we have a real chance to prevent a U.S. attack. One cogent argument after another, from intelligence veterans ( http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/08/31-2 ) and policy analysts ( http://www.thenation.com/blog/175928/moral-obscenities-syria ) and weapons experts ( http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/28/chemical-weapons-west-global-policeman ), has debunked the messaging for war on Syria. And some members of Congress -- not nearly enough, but some -- have begun to speak up with cogent opposition.
One of NPRs inside-the-box hosts of All Things Considered on August 30 asked Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) about the Obama administrations claim that missile strikes on Syria would be a limited action and not war. Congresswoman Lofgren replied: I think that anyone who argues that shooting missiles and dropping bombs on another country is not an act of war has got some further education warranted. If somebody shot cruise missiles at Washington for only one day, we would still consider it an act of war, wouldnt we?
Not many members of Congress have Lofgrens clarity, and many of their votes on authorization are up for grabs. Each of us can help affect the outcome by demanding that our senators and representative oppose the war resolution. We should make our voices heard in all sorts of public venues.
The presidents move for a congressional vote should cause a major escalation of anti-war activism. A straw in the wind: during just a few hours after Obamas announcement on Saturday afternoon, nearly 10,000 people took the initiative via RootsAction.org to email members of Congress with a No Attack on Syria message.
National opinion polling and momentum inside Congress indicate that we can defeat Obamas war resolution. Itll be a tremendous fight, but we can prevail.
<>
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)is a good read.