General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Prepares to Hear Major Case on Corporate Responsibility Abroad
The responsibility of major corporations for human rights abuses abroad will be argued on Tuesday in front of the Supreme Court. In the case, Esther Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, Shell is accused of assisting the Nigerian government in torturing and executing activists who were protesting Shells drilling operations in the Ogoni region of Nigeria, including Kiobels late husband, Dr. Barinem Kiobel. Kiobel and the others are suing under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which was passed in 1789 and allows federal courts to hear any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. Although ATCA was little used for about 190 years, since 1980 foreign nationals have used it more than 120 times to sue 59 corporations for acts perpetrated on them overseas. Examples include Indonesian villagers accusing ExxonMobils security forces of murder, torture and other abuses in 1999-2001; Firestone Tire Company accused of using child labor in Liberia; and Ford Motor and other firms accused of aiding South Africas apartheid system.
Shell and its corporate allies argue that the statute should be applied only to individuals, and not to corporations, in part because lawsuits against corporations can drag on for years. Other courts have allowed ATCA suits against corporations, but the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New York, accepted Shells argument in a ruling in 2010, thus setting up the Supreme Court showdown. For its part, the Obama administration has taken the side of Esther Kiobel.
One question that looms large, although it is technically separate, is how the Supreme Court will reconcile this case with that of Citizens United, in which the Court last year held that corporations have free speech rights that were violated by laws limiting or prohibiting corporate spending on political campaigns. Those who support application of ATCA to corporations point out that it would be inconsistent to treat corporations as legal persons when it comes to free speech rights, but not as persons when it comes to paying for wrongful acts.
http://www.allgov.com/Top_Stories/ViewNews/Supreme_Court_Prepares_to_Hear_Major_Case_on_Corporate_Responsibility_Abroad_120226
HowHasItComeToThis
(3,566 posts)The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)"No, we don't aid in torture" instead they say the law should not apply to them....