Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMissouri Madness: Statehouse Swagger in the Gun Debate
As a measure of the gun cultures dangerous sway over statehouse politicians, it is hard to top the pending proposal in Missouri that would pronounce all federal gun safety laws null and void in the state and allow the arrest of federal agents who try to enforce them.
This bizarre legislation, which Republican majorities hope to enact Sept. 11, would override an earlier veto by Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat, who noted the obvious fact that the measure is unconstitutional according to precedents stretching all the way to the Civil War.
But the bills proponents care little for legal niceties, or for the near-certainty of an adverse court ruling against their hoary states-rights gambit. Dusting off the polemics of nullification, the supposed law and order politicians in Jefferson City would rather support an unconstitutional measure than set a law-abiding example of government responsibility.
No less regrettable is that they are hardly alone in their obeisance to the gun lobby. Horrendous spates of gun violence have prompted six states to enact stronger gun safety laws in the last year. But a score of other statehouses have weakened existing laws, in particular loosening gun laws regulating the open carry of firearms, inviting public flaunting of weaponry.
This bizarre legislation, which Republican majorities hope to enact Sept. 11, would override an earlier veto by Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat, who noted the obvious fact that the measure is unconstitutional according to precedents stretching all the way to the Civil War.
But the bills proponents care little for legal niceties, or for the near-certainty of an adverse court ruling against their hoary states-rights gambit. Dusting off the polemics of nullification, the supposed law and order politicians in Jefferson City would rather support an unconstitutional measure than set a law-abiding example of government responsibility.
No less regrettable is that they are hardly alone in their obeisance to the gun lobby. Horrendous spates of gun violence have prompted six states to enact stronger gun safety laws in the last year. But a score of other statehouses have weakened existing laws, in particular loosening gun laws regulating the open carry of firearms, inviting public flaunting of weaponry.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/30/opinion/statehouse-swagger-in-the-gun-debate.html?_r=0&pagewanted=print
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 637 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri Madness: Statehouse Swagger in the Gun Debate (Original Post)
spanone
Aug 2013
OP
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)1. Was it "horrendous spates of gun violence" that brought on legislation,
or the predictable push for gun bans, and ammunition taxes, and magazine limits by the NYT et al? Maybe if gun controllers begin the conversation with improved and expanded BG checks, instead of using it as a fallback position, they would have more credibility.
Those many thousands of prople standing on line at gun shows all over the nation were not there because they were upset by BG checks. And it wasn't all about speculation on rising prices (which occurred). They were making a strong political statement to their "opposition."
Maybe the NYT needs to look closer to home when they whine about "swagger."
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)2. ^^^^^^^^^ This + 1000^^^^^^^^^^^^
spanone
(135,781 posts)3. gun controllers.....that's real funny
warrior1
(12,325 posts)4. I didn't think that state laws
could supersede federal laws.