Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,032 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:36 PM Aug 2013

"You've got to be kidding me"

Posted with permission.

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/08/30/20262049-those-who-still-get-the-iraq-wmd-story-wrong?lite

Those who still get the Iraq WMD story wrong
By Steve Benen
-
Fri Aug 30, 2013 3:37 PM EDT


It was a little jarring to hear Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) insist that Saddam Hussein "had weapons of mass destruction," and may have moved the stockpiles "over into Syria." I immediately double-checked the date, and sure enough, the comments came yesterday.

To clarify, those making remarks like these in August 2003 were foolish. For anyone, least of all an elected member of Congress, to repeat such things out loud in August 2013 suggests Louie Gohmert may, in fact, be made of wood.

Alas, he's not alone.

Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said on Thursday that he is against military intervention in Syria, even though his "gut feeling" is that the Syrian government now possesses chemical weapons that came from fallen Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

Terry, who has served in the House since 1999, supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. In an interview on Thursday with Omaha radio host Tom Becka, Terry said Syria was a completely different situation.

"The theory then and the evidence was that Iraq was an enemy of the United States and had direct plans in either support of al Qaeda and/or with other weapons that we found out weren't there -- which I still think they were moved to Syria," said Terry. "And it wouldn't surprise me if some of the chemical weapons that have been used by Syria actually came from Iraq."


The Nebraska Republican added, "{W}e all we know that Iraq had ... chemical and biological weapons and then they weren't there."

You've got to be kidding me.


It's painful to realize that there are still members of Congress who are confused about the basics, even now, a decade later.

But in case Reps. Terry and Gohmert see this, let's spell it out: Iraq's WMD stockpiles didn't exist. There's no reason to believe the weapons were moved to Syria since, once again, they didn't exist.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"You've got to be kidding me" (Original Post) babylonsister Aug 2013 OP
I always used to respond with this LearningCurve Aug 2013 #1
good response wish I'd thought of it bluemarkers Aug 2013 #17
I too remember that one treestar Aug 2013 #2
These are the same weapons we were also told at that same time were loaded in a ship. . . Journeyman Aug 2013 #3
Repukes are garbage. Rex Aug 2013 #4
What an insult to useful trash everywhere! nt Mnemosyne Aug 2013 #5
Rep. Louie Gohmert and Rep. Lee Terry have the intelligence and foresight of a >> BlueJazz Aug 2013 #6
Quit insulting bricks. Bricks are good people. jmowreader Aug 2013 #25
Sounds like a happy thing. I've started watching "The Sopranos" ....never seen the program before... BlueJazz Aug 2013 #29
I say we whack 'em with their share of the bill for Reagan's malfeasance jmowreader Aug 2013 #31
Fool the American people once, shame on you Aerows Aug 2013 #7
ReTHUGs are deliberately lying malaise Aug 2013 #8
RWReligionists have claimed for years that Saddam's WMD were buried in the plains north of Israel. freshwest Aug 2013 #9
Conservative Rule #1: Never Admit You Are Wrong.... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #10
These little lies have to be stamped out before they spread. reformist2 Aug 2013 #11
As we used to say when I was a kid, "Kill it before it multiplies!" maddiemom Sep 2013 #33
Gomert is contending with Dougla Feith JEB Aug 2013 #12
Those WMDs are notorious for wandering around 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #13
Next? Chemical Weapons move to Iran! nt bluedeathray Aug 2013 #14
Republicans are lying, uncouth, hypocritical, inbred imbeciles. blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #15
If you repeat a lie ad nauseam ... rizlaplus Aug 2013 #16
I have said many times before that politicians will say anything to justify MindMover Aug 2013 #18
We need mandatory IQ testing for all potential congress critters. n/t L0oniX Aug 2013 #19
At least we should apply the same standards to them as we do to teachers. maddiemom Sep 2013 #34
"willfully uninformed" Ain't that the truth. n/t L0oniX Sep 2013 #35
The sad thing is it doesn't surprise me that they think that iandhr Aug 2013 #20
thats a joke iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #21
Israeli sources claimed that in the Iraq run up. Turbineguy Aug 2013 #22
I don't think the shelf-life/half-life of most chemical weapons could last beyond a decade max shotten99 Aug 2013 #23
More GOP delusional none sense. There is absolutely no truth to this on point Aug 2013 #24
OMG I can't believe this guy got to Congress. gopiscrap Aug 2013 #26
yup that's going to be the excuse gopiscrap Aug 2013 #27
actually, iirc, the accepted wisdom on du at the time was unblock Aug 2013 #28
louie is living proof that moronic imbeciles can and do get elected to congress spanone Aug 2013 #30
Every time Louie opens his mouth I'm reminded of this Byrds song. hobbit709 Sep 2013 #42
Beleif vs. Fact - a simple error in logic Mopar151 Sep 2013 #32
It Seems They Came From Great Britain. cynzke Sep 2013 #36
Is he referring to the ones we sold them? Myrina Sep 2013 #37
Republicans still believe Saddam Hussein was responsible for 911 Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #38
gohmert is to dam dumb ..... madrchsod Sep 2013 #39
I heard the "they moved them" theory back in 2003... Beartracks Sep 2013 #40
Makes perfectly good sense rpannier Sep 2013 #41
I remember arguing with a right winger shortly after the start B Calm Sep 2013 #43
The mind-blowing part of that theory, for me at least, was this-- Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #44
 

LearningCurve

(488 posts)
1. I always used to respond with this
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:38 PM
Aug 2013

"If the WMDs got moved to Syria, why didn't we invade Syria?" I never got a good response to that.

bluemarkers

(536 posts)
17. good response wish I'd thought of it
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 02:00 PM
Aug 2013

rwnj friend posted this, and she just knew all along they would find the stockpiles.... errr what idiots, I ignored it, but if it comes up again , will use this response! lol

treestar

(82,383 posts)
2. I too remember that one
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:40 PM
Aug 2013

I specifically recall one wing nut family member asserting that. In which case, they should be for invading Syria now - not only do they have them, they used them.

No right winger has any cred to oppose war on Syria right now. In fact there are terrorists there and they are closer to these WMD.

Journeyman

(15,024 posts)
3. These are the same weapons we were also told at that same time were loaded in a ship. . .
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:58 PM
Aug 2013

and were floating about somewhere in the Indian Ocean while simultaneously being stored in Syria while they remained stockpiled in Iraq. Most Remarkable Weapons, indeed.

I remember too, given the very specific quantities cited in the run up to war, someone computed that in order to move all the weapons Iraq supposedly possessed would require a truck convoy some 50+ miles long. The question raised then was, how was such a massive movement of such supposedly deadly chemicals and explosives accomplished without anyone seeing it from the air?

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
25. Quit insulting bricks. Bricks are good people.
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 05:57 PM
Aug 2013

Since Ronald Reagan and Caspar Weinberger are responsible for Iraq having chemical weapons in the first place, does not Gohmert's admission mean that we should dig up Ronnie and Caspar, bury them in the Love Canal after grinding their bodies into a fine powder, scrape Ronnie's name off everything it's been pasted on, order Grover Norquist, Newt Gingrich, Ralph Reed and Arthur Laffer to commit seppuku in atonement for foisting that crappy actor on us, and in any other way attempt to erase the history of the worst eight years in the history of the United States?

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
29. Sounds like a happy thing. I've started watching "The Sopranos" ....never seen the program before...
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 09:19 PM
Aug 2013

...but rather reminds me of some people when I worked for CBS. ( Studio Musician).

Anyway..in keeping with the program, you think maybe we could whack a few of the Reagan voters...just for 'ol time sake and a little bit of payback or is that a little bit too much.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
7. Fool the American people once, shame on you
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 06:30 PM
Aug 2013

Fool the American people twice, shame on us.

Reaping what you sowed!

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
9. RWReligionists have claimed for years that Saddam's WMD were buried in the plains north of Israel.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 07:03 PM
Aug 2013

They say this with great conviction and claim the US military knows all about it, but the federal government won't tell as they are part of the plot. They claim the Founders were Luciferians and that all of our presidents are satanists or not human.

Some RWRs say Russia is a player in the Magog and Gog battle. They cite the size of the Chinese army which will join the whole world to destroy Israel.

Then the Second Coming will save Israel and all the true believers and throw all the non-believers in the lake of fire. Jesus will rule the world from Jerusalem and the temple sacrfices will begin. Everything will be like it was.

There are a few variations in this American theme, but that's where it was the last time I tuned in. Really can't stand it anymore. This is part of their End Times belief system.

Armageddon


Ruins atop Tel Megiddo.

The idea that a final Battle of Armageddon will be fought at Tel Megiddo has had a wide influence, especially in the US. According to Donald E. Wagner, Professor of Religion and Director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at North Park University, Ronald Reagan was an adherent of "Armageddon theology," and "seemed to blend his political analysis with his Armageddon theology quite naturally."[50]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armageddon

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
10. Conservative Rule #1: Never Admit You Are Wrong....
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:20 PM
Aug 2013

So NATURALLY you take your prior claim that Saddam moved his WMD to Syria and capitalize on the images of dead children to claim you were right.

Expect your crazy uncle to demand an apology over the holidays this year.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
13. Those WMDs are notorious for wandering around
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:35 PM
Aug 2013

They have an uncanny ability to show up where the USA is looking
for reasons to justify an attack.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
34. At least we should apply the same standards to them as we do to teachers.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:30 AM
Sep 2013

After all, they have FAR more influence on the willfully uninformed.

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
21. thats a joke
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 04:01 PM
Aug 2013

since Syria has the capability to do it on its own..

it doesn't need fake Iraqi weapons to gas its own people

Turbineguy

(37,291 posts)
22. Israeli sources claimed that in the Iraq run up.
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 04:20 PM
Aug 2013

The story was also that Saddam Hussein had a luxurious funk-hole built on the beach in Syria. There was also the claim that the Iraqis could shoot down any US plane. (I think Baghdad Bob confirmed this! Anything BB confirmed would be a fact, to a republican.)

As for Iraq sending the WMD's to Syria, it's certainly plausible. But those weapons would have to predate the first Iraq war. Would they be reliable after all this time?

shotten99

(622 posts)
23. I don't think the shelf-life/half-life of most chemical weapons could last beyond a decade max
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 04:27 PM
Aug 2013

(I know you're being snarky - i've actually heard a lot of similar comments that were serious)

unblock

(52,116 posts)
28. actually, iirc, the accepted wisdom on du at the time was
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 07:27 PM
Aug 2013

that iraq certainly *did* have chemical weapons at some point, because we supplied them for use in their war against iran.

that said, by the time of the build-up to the iraq war, they were long gone. some were used used against iran, some were used against "his own people" in iraq and some were destroyed.

so i think saying that they "didn't exist" is an overstatement.

Mopar151

(9,975 posts)
32. Beleif vs. Fact - a simple error in logic
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:00 AM
Sep 2013

If you make your Beleifs fit the Facts, then both are correct. If you attempt to make the Facts fit your Beleifs, there is little chance that the Beliif is valid, as the Facts cannot be correct if they are changed. My friend's analogy : Making the beleifs fit the facts is like trying to solve a jigsaw puzzle with cutting pliers!

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
37. Is he referring to the ones we sold them?
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:08 PM
Sep 2013

(Would post the pic of Rumsfeld et al shaking hands with Saddam but don't have it on my phone)z

Snake Plissken

(4,103 posts)
38. Republicans still believe Saddam Hussein was responsible for 911
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 03:33 PM
Sep 2013

There also believe the Earth is 6,000 years old

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
39. gohmert is to dam dumb .....
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 05:42 PM
Sep 2013

to come up with anything that could be called a thought.

just think...he`s smarter than the people who voted for him.......

Beartracks

(12,797 posts)
40. I heard the "they moved them" theory back in 2003...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:05 PM
Sep 2013

I remember a Republican sibling sending me something in an email in which was quoted or linked some story about satellite imagery showing military convoys heading into a neighboring country from Iraq on the eve of the U.S. invasion. I don't recall now if it was Syria or Iran... But I believe it was being bandied about as a likely theory about where the missing WMDs went, as well as an example of the kind of evidence that liberals were wont to ignore as they protested the invasion.

I don't remember now if that was ever debunked or not...

==============================

rpannier

(24,328 posts)
41. Makes perfectly good sense
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 06:55 AM
Sep 2013

I mean Hussein moves his most powerful deterrent/counter-strike military equipment to Syria and then stays in Iraq.
That argument is so incredibly stupid it defies even the remotest sense of logiv
But... then we're talking Gohmert Pyle USMC (Useless Simpleton Moron in Congress)

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
43. I remember arguing with a right winger shortly after the start
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 07:15 AM
Sep 2013

of the Iraq War. I said, if Iraq has WMD's why would they hide them? You'd think they would use them against an invading army.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
44. The mind-blowing part of that theory, for me at least, was this--
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 10:40 AM
Sep 2013

The most credible reason for Saddam to have had these hypothetical WMD would have been to repel an invasion--to be, in effect, too nasty a hornet's nest for anyone to want to attack it. Therefore it would have made no sense whatsoever for him to respond to our invasion threat by moving the WMD to places where he couldn't use them.

Don't draw yet, Marshal Dillon. I gotta throw my gun away first.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"You've got to be kidding...