Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 07:45 PM Aug 2013

Department of Peace

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Peace

Remember when Kucinich was mocked for proposing this during his campaign?

Now, had there been one, imagine the energy spent on searching for peaceful solutions to this latest crisis, as opposed to the energy spent trying to line up a military coalition and to determine which of various military options to implement.

When war is the only option, the only problem is articulating a rationale that is not utterly repellent.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Department of Peace (Original Post) rug Aug 2013 OP
I remember. LWolf Aug 2013 #1
There is no profit in peace... Cooley Hurd Aug 2013 #2
Ferengi Rule of Acquisition 35: Peace is good for business Hydra Aug 2013 #8
You honestly think that because there is no Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #3
How many agencies are being consulted on military options? How many on peaceful ones? rug Aug 2013 #7
Do you seriously Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #15
Let's see. Is anyone in the DIA, NSA, CIA, JCS, USAF, USN, USMC, etc. advocating for peace? rug Aug 2013 #17
You're right. Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #18
That is one of the most naive posts I've ever read here. rug Aug 2013 #20
Well, if I'm wrong ... Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #21
Listen "Summer", rug Aug 2013 #24
I'm finally putting you on ignore olddots Aug 2013 #12
And my heart is truly broken as a result. Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #16
You might notice that even when we 'win' a war, the aftermath in that nation is often troublesome Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #23
One of the (many) campaign platforms I supported Kucinich over... Earth_First Aug 2013 #4
Once again. name a peaceful solution... brooklynite Aug 2013 #5
I will name several. But first you name one. I want to see if any have even been considered. rug Aug 2013 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #6
And here are their concerns: rug Aug 2013 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #11
It will if that is the goal. rug Aug 2013 #13
A Dept. of Peace would be the right legacy for a president... polichick Aug 2013 #14
Absolutely right! Kath1 Aug 2013 #26
Unless the apparatus is structured so extensive military activity involves a substantial fraction struggle4progress Aug 2013 #19
The full name Kucinich and others have used is Dept of Peace and Nonviolence Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #22
Thanks for the link. rug Aug 2013 #25

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
8. Ferengi Rule of Acquisition 35: Peace is good for business
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:00 PM
Aug 2013

Of course, Rule 34 is: War is good for business

I posit that peace is good for everyone's business, war is good for some people's business.

We're all about limiting happiness and prosperity for the non-"elite."

Summer Hathaway

(2,770 posts)
3. You honestly think that because there is no
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 07:54 PM
Aug 2013

"Department of Peace", war is the only option that is ever considered?

That's a rhetorical question, BTW. I'm sure you actually do think that.

No doubt the Obama administration is lamenting the fact that peaceful solutions can never be considered, because there isn't an official department for dealing with them.





 

rug

(82,333 posts)
7. How many agencies are being consulted on military options? How many on peaceful ones?
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 07:59 PM
Aug 2013

Do you honestly think the resources spent on military options do not vastly outnumber the resources spent on peaceful options?

Summer Hathaway

(2,770 posts)
15. Do you seriously
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:35 PM
Aug 2013

think that 'resources spent' precludes Obama from considering any option other than military options?

Do you think that anyone advising this president is barred from raising the topic of alternate options because this administration has to 'get their money's worth' from the military?

I don't think this comes down to official departments, or money spent.

It comes down to a POTUS having to make decisions that will impact not only his own citizens, but people the world over. I sincerely doubt that in making those decisions, he only considers the opinions of those whose department got more funding than another.



 

rug

(82,333 posts)
17. Let's see. Is anyone in the DIA, NSA, CIA, JCS, USAF, USN, USMC, etc. advocating for peace?
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:43 PM
Aug 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_intelligence_agencies

If they advise against a strike it will be because it can't be pulled off successfully, not because it's the right thing to do.

There is an institutional mindset you ignore.

OTOH, maybe he gave the director of the Peace Corps a call.

Summer Hathaway

(2,770 posts)
18. You're right.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:54 PM
Aug 2013

I do ignore the "institutional mindset", because that mindset changes with each new administration, and is impacted by the POTUS in office, as well as the party he represents.

But I won't bother pointing out that Obama's administration and W's administration are different. That will only upset the Obama = Bushco brigade, who have taken over this site.



 

rug

(82,333 posts)
20. That is one of the most naive posts I've ever read here.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 09:01 PM
Aug 2013
that mindset changes with each new administration


"Bureaucratic thought does not deny the possibility of the science of politics, but regards it as identical with the science of administration." - Karl Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia (1929)

Summer Hathaway

(2,770 posts)
21. Well, if I'm wrong ...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 09:16 PM
Aug 2013

Then there was no point in whining about how Kucinich's "Department of Peace" would have had any effect whatsoever, as the 'institutional mindset' would not have been changed in any event as a result thereof.

You walked right into that one. Nicely done.





 

rug

(82,333 posts)
24. Listen "Summer",
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 11:03 PM
Aug 2013

First, no one is whining, even if it makes you feel better to think that.

Second, you give yourself more credit than the evidence warrants. No one walked into anything.

Third, if you had the astuteness you think you have, you'd realize that one way to break the institutional mindset, is to restructure it. A new executive department with a purpose historically different from the ones that have existed for decades is a start in that direction.

One thing is clear. You have more interest in admiring what you think is a grand intellect than you do in political science, war, or peace.

I would add a smiley of my own but that is, after all, a particularly stupid way of expressing thought.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. You might notice that even when we 'win' a war, the aftermath in that nation is often troublesome
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 09:55 PM
Aug 2013

a Department of Peace would address or attempt to address the continued pattern of which Afghanistan is the perfect example, nations invade, destroy then abandon them. No Peace department to assist with, you know, the peace.
And are you actually opposed to having a government agency that seeks to reduce violence here at home, domestic violence, petty crime, the Zimmerman type of shit, gang violence? This would be, in your view, a terrible thing to apply our energy toward? No one should learn mediation and we should not attempt to create a less violent culture?
I mean, your snark can be fun at times, but when you say you'd not like to see any work toward a less violent America and a more peaceful world, it becomes hard to fathom and lacks all entertainment value.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
4. One of the (many) campaign platforms I supported Kucinich over...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 07:55 PM
Aug 2013

I spent two primary campaigns in New Hampshire working for the Kucinich campaign.

I'd do it a third, too...

brooklynite

(94,489 posts)
5. Once again. name a peaceful solution...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 07:55 PM
Aug 2013

...that will stop a dictator holding on to power from killing his own citizens.

I'm sure you don't need Government bureaucrats to do your work for you.

Response to rug (Original post)

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
10. And here are their concerns:
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:04 PM
Aug 2013
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/08/30/the-five-big-points-from-john-kerrys-speech-on-syria/

1) The U.S. is still serious about strikes


The DoS is not an instrument of peace; it is the instrument of advancing administration foreign policy goals. If those goals coincide with peace, it's a happy coincidence.

Response to rug (Reply #10)

polichick

(37,152 posts)
14. A Dept. of Peace would be the right legacy for a president...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:29 PM
Aug 2013

who was awarded the peace prize on day one.

Not going to happen because the mic runs this gov't but, yes, if peace was where we put our energy and other resources, peace would stand a chance.

k&r

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
26. Absolutely right!
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 11:25 PM
Aug 2013

I never even knew such a thing had been proposed until I saw a bumper sticker. Sadly, the military-industrial complex is still in control. There is a lot more money to be made in war than peace.

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
19. Unless the apparatus is structured so extensive military activity involves a substantial fraction
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:56 PM
Aug 2013

of the citizenry, I don't think proposals like "Department of Peace" matter much

If everybody was required to do (say) two years of national service, with a regular reservist re-training for some years afterwards, and if military operations brought with them the possibility that many people could be called back into service, then there might be considerable public interest in policies emphasizing non-military resolutions

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
22. The full name Kucinich and others have used is Dept of Peace and Nonviolence
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 09:46 PM
Aug 2013

The focus of such a department would not be exclusively about foreign affairs and wars, but also about seeking to curtail violence in our own country, domestic violence, gun violence and to attempt to expand teaching of problem resolution and mediation techniques.
It is disheartening to see people who claim to care about such things as Trayvon being gunned down or a woman being beaten by her husband who mock the idea of attempting to bring nonviolence to the American cultural mindset. Fact is, such people do not give a fuck about people like Trayvon when they are not using them as rhetorical fodder. \
I guess it upsets them that Kucinich has advocated this. But he is far from alone.

9 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL TO ESTABLISH A CABINET LEVEL
DEPARTMENT OF PEACE and NONVIOLENCE

http://www.afdop.org/PDF/9ptsAFDOP.pdf

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Department of Peace