Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 03:43 PM Feb 2012

Romney's New Tax Plan: "If you are in trouble, promise to cut taxes. ..."

This is the first rule of Republican politics: If you are in trouble, promise to cut taxes. The second rule is similar: If you are in trouble and you have already promised to cut taxes, say you will cut them even more.

Romney didn’t completely junk his old plan, in which he had pledged to cut the tax rate on corporate profits from thirty-five per cent to twenty-five per cent, abolish the inheritance tax, and maintain Bush’s fifteen-per-cent rate on capital gains and dividends—and abolish it completely for people who earn less than two hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year. All these costly giveaways hold over to his new plan, where they have been supplemented with an across-the-board proposal to slash income taxes.

If you recall some of your grade-school arithmetic classes, where adding two negative numbers together gave you a larger negative number, you might suspect that cutting taxes for workers, businesses, investors, and dead people would produce a bigger gap between revenues and spending. This is the arithmetic that non-partisan budget experts are using when they estimate that Romney’s tax proposals would cost the U.S. Treasury somewhere between $4 trillion and $6 trillion over the next decade. But it’s also a misleading and unreliable type of arithmetic—according to Romney, anyway. “These changes will not add to the deficits,” he said with an impressively straight face. “Stronger economic growth, spending cuts, and base broadening will offset the reductions.”

Taken overall, though, his new plan goes well beyond tactical positioning. In promising yet another big round of tax cuts while simultaneously trying to depict the President as a feckless fiscal degenerate, someone who couldn’t balance his own checkbook, let alone the federal budget, Romney doesn’t merely come across as irresponsible. He looks desperate.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/02/romneys-new-tax-plan-big-bold-and-desperate.html?currentPage=all

I think bush couldn't have come up with a more derelict and dangerous tax plan - 'cut taxes and everything will be fine - than the Mittser has come up with.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney's New Tax Plan: "If you are in trouble, promise to cut taxes. ..." (Original Post) pampango Feb 2012 OP
The republicans think that if you put two negatives together, you will get a positive. liberal N proud Feb 2012 #1
Death by a thousand cuts sakabatou Feb 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney's New Tax Plan: &q...