General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you really think it's as simple as "it's the oil", why aren't we bombing Venezuela?
Compared to Syria, Venezuela is closer. Venezuela has a significantly smaller military. Venezuela has a lot more oil.
Simplistic explanations for complex processes rarely work.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)its about Russia's oil. Russia supplies EU with it....and Assad stands between them keeping a natural gas pipeline from being built through Syria. Russia would like to keep things that way...which is why Russia is so chummy with Assad.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I've never understood this particular allegation. They've been working with Iraq to expand their piping capacity for a few years now.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)big difference... Russia doesn't want THAT to happen
Recursion
(56,582 posts)From Egypt and Iraq. The problem there isn't getting to Turkey but across it.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)And can be stolen from. No one wants a country that will take 5-10 years to get its security back in shape to keep oil theft from happening.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Don't give them any ideas.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Little doubt about that.
Saudi Arabia seems to play a role in everything. Just saying.
A complex of lies can be undone by a single simple truth.
What do you think the reason is?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Some combination of proximity to oil-producing countries, proximity to Israel, support for Hezbollah, support from Iran, trying to squeeze Russia's influence out of the Levant, credibility for US-drawn red lines about WMDs, concerns about Kurdish agitation in Turkey and Iraq... there's probably a dozen more, but that's off the top of my head.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Making somebody more wealthy takes the entire top twenty.
devils chaplain
(602 posts)n/t
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)What evidence do you have that this admin has been just dying to attack Syria if they didn't do it for all that time?
devils chaplain
(602 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)What evidence do you have beyond wishful thinking?
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)hasn't thought that through. So they went with the standard ME line. And it promptly got swallowed whole here. And even linked to. Yes, Conservatives For Liberty was linked to in order to prove Obama is evil. What a fucking joke.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)Hestia
(3,818 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)1) Light Sweet Crude
2) Suez Canal
3) Volume of Oil in entire region
4) Politically viable military action
5) Huge oil industry Infrastructure
These ''rebuttals'' are rarely thought through.
But then, that's not their purpose.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)They have 296 billion barrels of conventional oil and 513 billion barrels of unconventional oil. Venezuela makes up 9% of US oil imports, so the infrastructure is already there to make a post-invasion process viable.
mick063
(2,424 posts)I'm sure we will start on South America.
Don't worry. they will have their day in the sun.
Untenable resource demand will perpetuate global wars for the next millennium and beyond.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)It's not actually going to work out that way. The US will be exporting its dirty coal (of which it has a lot) and oil to developing countries.
mick063
(2,424 posts)No doubt there is a lot of fossil fuels available in North America. The Middle East stuff is so much easier to extract and refine. We won't leave until we have to.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)I don't have the patience to cite the sources, but there are people that think that the US is about to any day bomb Venezuela. In particular when the latest elections happened and there were non-violent protests there were non-stop discussions about how Venezuela was "descending into chaos." It was embarrassing, especially since most people don't know squat about Venezuela except what they read on propaganda sites.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)It's about faux outrage.
It's about what privilege brings, and the feelings one has against those who do not have such privilege.
In short, it's about a racket. Quite possibly the oldest racket ever invented.
Rex
(65,616 posts)that gets left alone. You are right it is not about the oil.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)with their ME invasions for the next decade.
Meantime, South American nations sick of our interference and support for Dictators, regained their sovereignties one after the other. They then formed their version of NATO in order to protect themselves from any further interference from the Western Powers.
Attacking Venezuela now would not be like Venezuela ten years ago. We would be fighting the entire region. This was a very smart move on the part of a region of the world that suffered so long under US Backed Dictators.
Iow, a strike on Venezuela would be a strike on all the countries who are part of that coalition.
That's one reason. If the ME countries had had a similar organization, it would have been far more difficult to attack them one at a time as we are doing. Africa also has considered forming their own version of NATO in order to defend against Western interventions.
Maybe the West should just try buying the resources they need instead of continuing these murderous invasions that have been going on for hundreds of years, destroying populations and their cultures and sovereignty.
The sad thing is this country was once the hope of the world to put an end to these Colonial invasions. Now we are leading them.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)its many many things, but not for resources
quakerboy
(13,919 posts)2) Different countries, different situations. You might as well ask if its about oil, why aren't we bombing Canada. Think about allies, politics, abilities, and potentials. Essentially, what can we get away with. Syria, maybe. Venezuela not so much. talk about uniting South American against the USA.
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)....pretty simple, really.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)If a civil war broke out in Venezuela what makes you think we wouldn't be looking for an opportunity to bomb them?
There wasn't the talk of bombing Syria until the opportunity arose.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)This sort of thing helps maintain hegemony in the Middle East.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Syria has few regional allies. Venezuela does.
The Venezuelan government has the popular support of its people. Syria does not.
Venezuela is a bona fide democracy. Syria is not.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)to here if you are so inclined. Syrians could not stroll across the seas to retaliate. Of course it is no only about the oil, but the oil is a factor and the only real reason we are obsessed with that entire region. Vast swaths of the world do not get the focus the ME gets, and the reason is oil.
indepat
(20,899 posts)and untold attempts have purportedly been made to undermine its government: to wit, we are working on it as we feverishly work to undermine practically every undesirable (i.e., left-leaning) regime on the face of the earth.
reusrename
(1,716 posts)Doh!