Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:31 PM Sep 2013

Oh Snap…! The Syrian Opposition Vows to Join Ranks with Assad if US Attacks Syria

Oh Snap…! The Syrian Opposition Vows to Join Ranks with Assad if US Attacks Syria

A senior Syrian opposition figure warned Washington that all its
interests in the region will be attacked by battalions of suicide
bombers formed by the Syrian opposition forces if it dares to attack
Syria, stressing that homeland is more important to the dissidents than
opposition to the government.

“Although, we are among the Syrian government’s opposition forces, we
assume our homeland’s interests to be more important than any other
interest and therefore, we have formed a number of battalions to conduct
suicide operations and target the US interests in the Middle-East,”
Secretary-General of al-Shabab Party Mahir Marhaj told FNA on Saturday.
He blasted the US and its allies’ warmongering policies and threats,
and said, “We in al-Shabab party are highly prepared to confront any war
against Syria.”


MORE:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=368_1377994715
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh Snap…! The Syrian Opposition Vows to Join Ranks with Assad if US Attacks Syria (Original Post) kpete Sep 2013 OP
It's complicated. daleo Sep 2013 #1
Consider the source. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #2
Exactly the source is highly questionable and shouldn't be taken seriously maddezmom Sep 2013 #10
I have seen some fucked up sources posted on DU over the years but arely staircase Sep 2013 #16
Hehe. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #23
Who cares about sources on DU anymore? zappaman Sep 2013 #19
oh man arely staircase Sep 2013 #27
Palm smack to the forehead....This. Is. Why. Striking. Syria. Is. Not. A. Good. Idea. nt Ninga Sep 2013 #3
Oh ...this will be fun. L0oniX Sep 2013 #4
oh so the opposition to assad is saying thanks but no no thanks myob USA. SummerSnow Sep 2013 #5
Gees who'da thought? fadedrose Sep 2013 #6
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. TM99 Sep 2013 #7
So if we bomb an open space in Syria we can stop the civil war? RGinNJ Sep 2013 #8
The bullshit is deep these days, rivers of it. bemildred Sep 2013 #9
Lets drop bombs in the middle of the Mediteranean. HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #11
Only if you pass out leaflets to fishing boats fadedrose Sep 2013 #14
Cue Abbott and Costello. Let's see, who's on first...? TheCowsCameHome Sep 2013 #12
KICKED VERY HARD, FOOT HURTS EVEN fadedrose Sep 2013 #13
because the source has also reported the existence of time machines. nt arely staircase Sep 2013 #20
Has the source ever reported anything accurately? Igel Sep 2013 #24
well the Onion article they once ran with was real arely staircase Sep 2013 #26
OMG That's even bigger news.. fadedrose Sep 2013 #28
This is a massive cluster**** LittleBlue Sep 2013 #15
going to? the video of those kids screaming and foaming at the mouth as they choked on gas arely staircase Sep 2013 #21
You're a more moral person than the rest of us LittleBlue Sep 2013 #25
So we can send a few missiles in, they can quit fighting, and the crisis will be over? JVS Sep 2013 #17
if you follow the logic of this story, that would be the case wouldn't it? nt arely staircase Sep 2013 #22
the CIA'd like that: they want to reduce the lag time between "supporting the increasingly-Salafist MisterP Sep 2013 #18
Hey, if that happens and Obama ends the war, he's a freakin' genius! n2doc Sep 2013 #29
well then we'd be uniting them. right? spanone Sep 2013 #30

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
2. Consider the source.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:35 PM
Sep 2013
In April 2013, the agency carried a story claiming a 27-year-old Iranian scientist had invented a time machine that allowed people to see into the future. A few days later the story was removed, and replaced with a story quoting an Iranian government official that no such device had been registered.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fars_News_Agency


Lol.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
23. Hehe.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:25 PM
Sep 2013

This is also the source that reprinted an article from The Onion as fact.


Fars News Agency, a semi-official mouth piece of the Iranian regime, earnestly published a word-for-word duplicate of an article from the Onion, a spoof news organisation based in Chicago.
The satirical article cited a fake Gallup poll which found that 77 per cent of white, rural voters would rather go to a baseball game or have a beer with Mr Ahmadinejad than with the US president.






http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9574727/Iran-fooled-by-US-satirical-website-The-Onion.html

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
27. oh man
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 03:09 PM
Sep 2013

today has taken the cake for the posting of unsourced/poorly sourced random shit that people are outraged over or seem to think prove something or another.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
6. Gees who'da thought?
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:37 PM
Sep 2013

All it took was threatening to bomb the country has united the opposing teams making bombing the country unnecessary?

I hope I read that right, read it fast, nah, it couldn't be right....

Congratulations again Mr. President.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
7. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:40 PM
Sep 2013

Why does this sound familiar?

Unite to drive out an invader then go right back to sectarian violence and continued civil war?

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
9. The bullshit is deep these days, rivers of it.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:51 PM
Sep 2013

They do seem to understand this public relations stuff better now.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
11. Lets drop bombs in the middle of the Mediteranean.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:54 PM
Sep 2013

That way no civilians will be killed, and the rebels won't turn against us. And it sends the same message to Assad that "chemical weapons use isn't acceptable, but we can't prevent you from using them". The MIC gets to replace a few Tomahawks, and Obama gets relief for his war-boner. Win-win for all concerned.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
13. KICKED VERY HARD, FOOT HURTS EVEN
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:10 PM
Sep 2013

This is news!!! How come so few have commented on it?

Haven't heard anything on the teevee either ..

Igel

(35,298 posts)
24. Has the source ever reported anything accurately?
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:54 PM
Sep 2013

This is known as an ad hominem fallacy. Because the person making the claim cannot possibly be trusted the claim must be false.

There is no need for the claim to be false unless the person making the claim must necessarily only present false information.

The news agency reports lots of true things. It also reports absurdities.

Rather than conclude the report must be false, the appropriate response is to evaluate the claim independently, if possible, seek confirmation, or to say that there are more pressing claims to use available resources to evaluate (Peirce would be proud).

It's not an unreasonable claim, but it's most likely going to be only partially true. The extent of its truth isn't something that I find worth wasting resources on.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
26. well the Onion article they once ran with was real
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:58 PM
Sep 2013

in the sense that the Onion does actually exist, unlike the time machine they reported on.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
21. going to? the video of those kids screaming and foaming at the mouth as they choked on gas
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:15 PM
Sep 2013

made me cry already. I guess some have a higher threshold.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
25. You're a more moral person than the rest of us
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:58 PM
Sep 2013

I'll give you that to avoid 10 pointless replies, it's what you're looking for anyway.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
18. the CIA'd like that: they want to reduce the lag time between "supporting the increasingly-Salafist
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:12 PM
Sep 2013

Freedom Fighters" and "assassinating those Islamist menaces and anyone else over 5' 11" " to zero
it took us like 7 years to stop liking the mujhahedeen (in fact we stopped paying **L on 9-12-01); Benghazi! was aimed at the CIA goon squads hunting down the people they were aiding a few months earlier; for Syria, the CIA has been reported (LA Times?) to be planning bombing runs on the rebels while arming the rebels

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oh Snap…! The Syrian Oppo...