Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 05:50 PM Sep 2013

There's always money for war

but never money for the needs of the people. The MIC must be fed.

Notice how the cost for this isn't even being debated? It doesn't matter if this costs $10 million, $100 million, $1 billion or $100 billion, the money will be found. But the money for our dilapidated infrastructure is nowhere to be found. The money for head start is nowhere to be found. Our priorities are fucked up. I guess we need to blow shit up to make it a priority.

Yesterday, there was a thread with this link in it. The GOP wants a wider war to take out Assad. They want the MIC to gorge on the budget with a new war and starve the programs for the people like Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, etc.

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's always money for war (Original Post) neverforget Sep 2013 OP
K&R DJ13 Sep 2013 #1
Absolute truth. 99Forever Sep 2013 #2
Amen--it's just "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss." nt raccoon Sep 2013 #39
And they want to cut Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps, Aid to dependent Families and a whole RC Sep 2013 #3
It's rather depressing the priorities and justifications we use for action and inaction neverforget Sep 2013 #5
Follow the money. No "War For Profit." blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #4
If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick or care for our elderly ... Scuba Sep 2013 #6
We shouldn't be bickering about money when the issue involves morality Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #7
Exactly! Budget Sequestration. tecelote Sep 2013 #8
Or the debt limit neverforget Sep 2013 #27
Maybe we should tell the Republicans Enthusiast Sep 2013 #42
Public funded elections, one day..I hope. n/t Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #9
That would go a long ways towards to fixing neverforget Sep 2013 #13
It is so painfully obvious, isn't it? n/t Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #14
It sure is. neverforget Sep 2013 #23
The MIC needs to be shut down. Zero dollars to Department of Defense/Homeland Security Billy Love Sep 2013 #10
All Too True - The US Is Great At Destroying Things - Not So Good At Building For The Long Term cantbeserious Sep 2013 #11
That is precisely what this whole "crisis" is about. Feeding the military-industrial complex. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #12
You and me both! neverforget Sep 2013 #25
BINGO ! pangaia Sep 2013 #15
just wait, the reTHUGS will vote to pay for it by defunding the affordable care act aka Obamacare spanone Sep 2013 #16
they'll get their pound of flesh somehow. neverforget Sep 2013 #18
K&R! Phlem Sep 2013 #17
That's because.. sendero Sep 2013 #19
It sure is. The MIC is far too powerful. neverforget Sep 2013 #22
The simplicity of your statement is so true Curmudgeoness Sep 2013 #20
K&R nt avebury Sep 2013 #21
This needs kicked mick063 Sep 2013 #24
yup our priorities are all fucked up gopiscrap Sep 2013 #26
priorities? Supersedeas Sep 2013 #58
With Afghanistan winding down and the sequester cramping DOD expenditures... soryang Sep 2013 #28
Keeping near the top. mick063 Sep 2013 #29
Thank you! I'm heading to bed now. neverforget Sep 2013 #30
If they REALLY want war, RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #31
How about a "war tax" levied exclusively on the 1%? DirkGently Sep 2013 #38
Which is why the Republicans might go along with it durablend Sep 2013 #32
if they see an opportunity to screw the little guy, it'd be neverforget Sep 2013 #33
We are a country that doesn't take care of it's own citizens. CrispyQ Sep 2013 #34
All the arguments to cut Social Security have failed because of this. mick063 Sep 2013 #35
Halliburton recieved $40 Billion pjt7 Sep 2013 #36
Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that war spending largely benefits the 1%, DirkGently Sep 2013 #37
damn straight it's the 1%. they are the puppet neverforget Sep 2013 #41
Tax this shit to the wealthy. Hear the brakes squeal. DirkGently Sep 2013 #46
There is no talk of a dollar tag for this let alone paying for it. neverforget Sep 2013 #50
A budget is, first and formost.... Wounded Bear Sep 2013 #40
pretty much. neverforget Sep 2013 #45
And, there's always the MIC and politicians eager to cash in. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #43
Yup, they are the only people who stand to benefit from a war with Syria. Initech Sep 2013 #44
If it was about the people of Syria, we'd been outraged about the previous 100,000 deaths. neverforget Sep 2013 #47
More innocents will be killed pjt7 Sep 2013 #48
Has to be on the first page. mick063 Sep 2013 #49
You're right, nobody will ask how we will pay for it n/t doc03 Sep 2013 #51
I haven't heard a peep about it. neverforget Sep 2013 #52
Drizzle drazzle druzzle drome. Time for this one to come home. mick063 Sep 2013 #53
It is sad. roamer65 Sep 2013 #54
our priorities are messed up. neverforget Sep 2013 #56
K&R liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #55
Back to the top mick063 Sep 2013 #57
Not enough money to strengthen Social Security. mick063 Sep 2013 #59
Yeah and that is disgusting. neverforget Sep 2013 #60
OP title of the year mick063 Sep 2013 #61
A most important message. mick063 Sep 2013 #62
Cannot be forgotten. mick063 Sep 2013 #63
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
3. And they want to cut Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps, Aid to dependent Families and a whole
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:27 PM
Sep 2013
host of safety net programs because we do not have enough money?

We can afford to spend hundreds of billions intervening in foreign conflicts, with no talk of the monetary cost?

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
5. It's rather depressing the priorities and justifications we use for action and inaction
Reply to RC (Reply #3)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:35 PM
Sep 2013

at home and abroad.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
6. If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick or care for our elderly ...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:55 PM
Sep 2013

... just what is it the defense budget is defending?

Snake Plissken

(4,103 posts)
7. We shouldn't be bickering about money when the issue involves morality
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:18 PM
Sep 2013

And if it involves fetuses, oil, or lining the pockets of billionaires ... it's about morality

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
8. Exactly! Budget Sequestration.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:30 PM
Sep 2013

We can not afford it.

Every Republican has yelled and yelled about how we're broke.

We can't afford it.

Period.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
27. Or the debt limit
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:42 PM
Sep 2013
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/01/syria-fiscal-debate_n_3853750.html

WASHINGTON, Sept 1 (Reuters) - A vote in Congress over whether to launch U.S. attacks against Syria is expected to wreak collateral damage - leaving too little time on Capitol Hill to deal with fast-approaching fall deadlines to fund government agencies and raise the debt limit.

That increases the likelihood that U.S. lawmakers will agree to a short-term government funding measure to get them through the fall, postponing for another day any broader deal or big showdowns.

The House of Representatives had previously scheduled only nine legislative days in September after they return from summer recess on Sept. 9, prompting analysts to view this as barely enough to pass government funding legislation in time to avoid a federal shutdown as the new fiscal year starts Oct. 1.

But now much of that time is likely to be eaten up with a contentious debate over authorizing the use of military force to punish Syria, analysts say.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
42. Maybe we should tell the Republicans
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:16 PM
Sep 2013

that a strike on Syria also might kill thousands of unborn babies.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
12. That is precisely what this whole "crisis" is about. Feeding the military-industrial complex.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:02 PM
Sep 2013

I for one am sick of it.

soryang

(3,299 posts)
28. With Afghanistan winding down and the sequester cramping DOD expenditures...
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 12:16 AM
Sep 2013

...the war contractors are looking at the top line shrinking radically, so another war is just what is needed. The huge opportunity costs of war and military adventurism are great for destroying the social fabric at home and lining the pockets of the rich.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
31. If they REALLY want war,
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 08:51 AM
Sep 2013

they should be willing to raise taxes to pay for it. They should reinstate a draft, so that there would be enough military, as to not need expensive "consultants." The taxes should be on businesses as well as individuals.

The precedent of not raising taxes to pay for war, should be a big issue with RepubliCONs, however it is not. They will wage war for anything, without raising taxes. Bush even CUT taxes, when he waged war on Iraq.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
38. How about a "war tax" levied exclusively on the 1%?
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:34 PM
Sep 2013

Given that people of ordinary means largely FIGHT the wars, it seems only reasonable that those best able to bear the cost of these "discretionary" wars pay for all of them.

It's been estimated every American family owes $40-50,000 for our adventures in Iraq.

I wonder how many would be spoiling for another optional intervention in the ME if every millionaire in the country had to pay for an equal share of the whole thing?

Take away the premise we can take it all back from social programs and infrastructure.

See who still finds these wars to be morally imperative.



durablend

(7,455 posts)
32. Which is why the Republicans might go along with it
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 08:57 AM
Sep 2013

The perfect opportunity to cut funding for a whole load of domestic stuff the "libruls" like.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
33. if they see an opportunity to screw the little guy, it'd be
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 09:23 AM
Sep 2013

hard for them to pass up. It's who they are.

CrispyQ

(36,410 posts)
34. We are a country that doesn't take care of it's own citizens.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 09:36 AM
Sep 2013

It's shameful, but what really gets me is how many Americans fall for this 'we've got to have a big bad military' bullshit. My mother was one. She was on government assistance & voted republican.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
35. All the arguments to cut Social Security have failed because of this.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:02 PM
Sep 2013

The priority to funnel money into the arms manufacturers has never been more apparent.

Fiscal conservatives are not conservative when it comes to military adventure. Endless war is breaking this nation and the people that benefit the most, are expecting the middle class to pay for it all.

pjt7

(1,293 posts)
36. Halliburton recieved $40 Billion
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:11 PM
Sep 2013

of USA Goverment war contracts, for the last 10 years of war.

Think they want to stop that?

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
37. Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that war spending largely benefits the 1%,
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:16 PM
Sep 2013

while the costs are born by the 99% could it?

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
46. Tax this shit to the wealthy. Hear the brakes squeal.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:29 PM
Sep 2013

If the wealthiest corporations and individuals had to pay a specific, non-dodgeable tax for each of these extra-legal, pre-emptively self-defensive, message-sending "regime change" adventures, it would be over tomorrow.

Suddenly there would be no moral obscenity. There would be no red lines. There would be only the deafening silence of erstwhile war hawks losing their enthusiasm for anything for which they, rather than everyone else, bore the risks, costs, and tradeoffs.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
50. There is no talk of a dollar tag for this let alone paying for it.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 08:48 PM
Sep 2013

As I said, the money will always be found for war.

Wounded Bear

(58,571 posts)
40. A budget is, first and formost....
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:39 PM
Sep 2013

a moral document. It is where you delineate you priorities.

So yeah, you could say by that that we are pretty much a fucked up country whose priorities generally suck.

Initech

(100,013 posts)
44. Yup, they are the only people who stand to benefit from a war with Syria.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:23 PM
Sep 2013

Oil and gas contractors, military contractors, and other evil forces are the ones who stand to benefit. It's all about the money.

I have said it before and I will say it again with double, triple emphasis:

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PEOPLE OF SYRIA!!!!!!!!!!!

It is all about the military industrial complex wanting more war for profit. They could not give less of a fuck what happens to the people of Syria.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
47. If it was about the people of Syria, we'd been outraged about the previous 100,000 deaths.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 06:21 PM
Sep 2013

Instead, we looked the other way until the means of killing changed.

pjt7

(1,293 posts)
48. More innocents will be killed
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 06:33 PM
Sep 2013

if we launch missles.

That's common sense.

Look @ Iraq & Libya which the killing have not stopped, although the media told us our bombs are for peace & Freedom.

800 killed in Iraq in August.

& Syria is not really a Civil War considering the House of Saud & Qatar are spending $Billions to send Foregn Jihadist in from Chechnya, Tunusia, Saud Arabia etc etc

roamer65

(36,744 posts)
54. It is sad.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 10:43 PM
Sep 2013

So many go hungry and homeless in this country, yet war gets a higher priority...sad legacy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's always money for ...