Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,974 posts)
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:34 PM Sep 2013

Just awful to have McCain elevated to point man in Congress on Syrian strike resolution

___________________________

Can you name any other member of Congress that has the visibility of McCain as an open Obama ally on Syria right now? Even with that opportunistic support from the republican looney-bin, there's a definite backbiting tone to the statements coming from the former rival for the presidency.

Couple that with the grudging, backstabbing politics being waged by republicans like McCain's tag-team member, Lindsay Graham, the President's pursuit of a congressional resolution is either going to pit the WH against our most stalwart Democrats as it threatens to pass the vote, or, align the President with the worst of the republican cabal and the most conservative of Democrats.

Just awful.




Lynn Sweet ‏@lynnsweet 17m
McCain urging Obama to make stronger links between #Syria and Iran; critical of Obama doing nothing for some two years.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just awful to have McCain elevated to point man in Congress on Syrian strike resolution (Original Post) bigtree Sep 2013 OP
Obama is the post-partisan President. TM99 Sep 2013 #1
the other side of the aisle has the worst of motivations for whatever they advocate bigtree Sep 2013 #2
To everyone who replied, TM99 Sep 2013 #14
hard to tell these days, TM99 Skittles Sep 2013 #17
Unfortunately, I am beginning TM99 Sep 2013 #19
He's not being post partisan, he's getting the War Hawk's support for more war NightWatcher Sep 2013 #3
We essentially have one party now: the Corporate Party woo me with science Sep 2013 #13
Did you watch? I'd like to see the video Catherina Sep 2013 #4
mainly just tweets right now - consider the sources bigtree Sep 2013 #5
TPM - "McCain: Blocking Obama On Syria Would Be ‘Catastrophic’ For U.S." Catherina Sep 2013 #7
Well, that has worked great in the past daleo Sep 2013 #8
I'm sure the Syrian people must be impressed with the stunning success we can point to next door Catherina Sep 2013 #10
PBO has a HUGE bat and two big balls so underthematrix Sep 2013 #6
You think McCain is happy the Resolution will preclude regime change? KittyWampus Sep 2013 #9
I'm thinking he'll take what he can get. MoonRiver Sep 2013 #11
Who says he is 'elevated'? randome Sep 2013 #12
What I want to know is, what was McCain's response. Will he pitch it or not. Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #15
This is NOT why I voted "DEMOCRAT". bvar22 Sep 2013 #16
That McLame ... he's just so darn mavericky. lpbk2713 Sep 2013 #18
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
1. Obama is the post-partisan President.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:44 PM
Sep 2013

It is good to see him crossing the aisles to get support for the really and truly important policies.

bigtree

(85,974 posts)
2. the other side of the aisle has the worst of motivations for whatever they advocate
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:46 PM
Sep 2013

WHATEVER they advocate.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
14. To everyone who replied,
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:57 PM
Sep 2013

I was being very sarcastic.

I didn't think I needed to say that in the original post.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
3. He's not being post partisan, he's getting the War Hawk's support for more war
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:52 PM
Sep 2013

It's actually a pretty sickening thing to see. When you've got to run to Gramps for support maybe you're on the wrong side of an issue. Unless of course you're pro war, in that case I'm sure you all love Grampy McWarmonger.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
13. We essentially have one party now: the Corporate Party
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:47 PM
Sep 2013

with the exception of a very few, principled holdouts.


Catherina

(35,568 posts)
4. Did you watch? I'd like to see the video
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:53 PM
Sep 2013

Did McCain really say this?

Ewen MacAskill ‏@ewenmacaskill 30m

McCain says that Obama agreed he would upgrade the Syrian rebels military.


bigtree

(85,974 posts)
5. mainly just tweets right now - consider the sources
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:57 PM
Sep 2013
Zeke Miller ‏@ZekeJMiller 46m

McCain says it’s “shameful” that arms haven’t flowed to Syrian opposition

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
7. TPM - "McCain: Blocking Obama On Syria Would Be ‘Catastrophic’ For U.S."
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:17 PM
Sep 2013

McCain: Blocking Obama On Syria Would Be ‘Catastrophic’ For U.S.

Sahil Kapur 3:15 PM EDT, Monday September 2, 2013

After meeting with President Barack Obama on Monday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said he supports the need to intervene against Bashar al-Assad's Syrian regime over its alleged use of chemical weapons.

He said if Congress votes down the resolution, it would be "catastrophic because it would undermine the credibility of the United States and the president of the United States."

McCain said U.S. credibility would be "shredded" internationally if Congress thwarts a president after he has already committed to military action.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who also took part in the meeting, said he and McCain would like to see a more sustained military effort but that he intended to support the authorization plan that emerges.

Graham said "a pretty solid plan" was emerging from the administration "upgrade the opposition" and to "degrade" Assad's regime. "We don't want endless war... We want sustainable security. And Syria is a cancer that's growing in the region."

"I think they're going to have to work very hard," McCain said, to ensure the resolution passes Congress.

Watch:



http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mccain-blocking-obama-on-syria-would-be-catastrophic

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
10. I'm sure the Syrian people must be impressed with the stunning success we can point to next door
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:33 PM
Sep 2013

as proof of the "freedom" they have coming if these people get away with their next war.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
6. PBO has a HUGE bat and two big balls so
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:13 PM
Sep 2013

he doesn't have a problem sharing the limelight with a guy who's been walking around with a nub and two tiny beads. McCain is still a piece of shit but PBO using the shit to get what he needs to get done.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
12. Who says he is 'elevated'?
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:37 PM
Sep 2013

That's the problem with our system of government. We have 535 prima donnas who have access to a public stage and microphone.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
15. What I want to know is, what was McCain's response. Will he pitch it or not.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 05:02 PM
Sep 2013

I want to see what this hypocrite does. If Obama wants out of this with cover, he might
just get it from the pseudo maverick.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
16. This is NOT why I voted "DEMOCRAT".
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 05:15 PM
Sep 2013

If I liked the way Republicans think,
I would have voted for them.





Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just awful to have McCain...