Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:23 AM Sep 2013

John Bolton: I’d ‘vote no’ on Syria strike

John Bolton: I’d ‘vote no’ on Syria strike

By LUCY MCCALMONT

If former Ambassador to the UN John Bolton were a member of Congress, he said Tuesday that he’d vote against a plan to use military strikes in Syria.

“I think if I were a member of Congress I would vote against an authorization to use force here. I don’t think it is in America’s interest. I don’t think we should in effect take sides in the Syrian conflict,” Bolton said on “Fox and Friends.”

Bolton, who said he “would not have referred the matter to Congress,” added there isn’t enough to convince him that a strike would made an impact in the region.

“There’s very little to recommend either side to me, and I think the notion that a limited strike, which is what the President seems to be pursuing, will not create a deterrent effect with respect to either to Syria’s use of chemical weapons or more seriously, Iran’s nuclear weapons program. So all in all, since I don’t see any utility to, to the use of military force in Syria in this context, I would vote no.”

- more -

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/john-bolton-syria-vote-96195.html

Thus far, Noam Chomsky (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023586131) Ron Paul (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023584212) and John Yoo (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023583127) have weighed in.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Bolton: I’d ‘vote no’ on Syria strike (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2013 OP
David Frum lol jakeXT Sep 2013 #1
Is this an attempt to compare, those who are against military intervention in Syria, to Repugs? nt boston bean Sep 2013 #2
It's instructive to read everyone's comments. All of them. Don't you think. Even Bolton. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #7
Oh horseshit.. He's just saying that because it's Obama. . . .n/t annabanana Sep 2013 #3
Since you are trying to smear anti-Syrian war people... former9thward Sep 2013 #4
Ha-ha-ha. ProSense allies herself with Max Boot and L. Paul Bremer :) - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #10
Get a grip. I did no such thing. There ProSense Sep 2013 #14
Full list of your RW allies: HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #20
Here, ProSense Sep 2013 #26
Any bed that has Norm Coleman AND Max Boot (and Elliott Abrams) in it is HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #28
Good for you. Do you want to be in "any bed" with Bolton? ProSense Sep 2013 #30
You're the one in bed with the vast majority of NeoCons, not I - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #32
So you're admitting to being "in bed" with at least one "Neocon," and projecting ProSense Sep 2013 #37
:rofl: - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #38
Is that an admission? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #39
Yoo is anti-war? Did you object to posting those opinions? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #11
Hey ProSense, wanna know what Karl Rove thinks? nt David Krout Sep 2013 #16
I have no idea of whether Yoo is anti-war or pro-war. former9thward Sep 2013 #44
Bolton's lying, as usual. (nt) Paladin Sep 2013 #5
And if he were in a Prez Romney administration... JHB Sep 2013 #6
That is not what he said just last week Kingofalldems Sep 2013 #8
Isn't John Bolton a NeoCon DontTreadOnMe Sep 2013 #9
Is John Bolton "the neocons"? David Krout Sep 2013 #13
ProSense: I'd 'vote yes' on Syria strike whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #12
whatchamacallit: "Since we're playing the A-hole Bedfellows game..." ProSense Sep 2013 #18
Crazy how you won't own your tactics whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #21
whatchamacallit: "Since we're playing the A-hole Bedfellows game..." ProSense Sep 2013 #24
The right and left are unified against war blazeKing Sep 2013 #15
I think you will see it is 50/50 when the vote actually happens DontTreadOnMe Sep 2013 #19
List of all the RW assholes on record supporting a Syria strike: HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #17
Evidently, ProSense Sep 2013 #23
How's it feel snuggling up to Norm Coleman? - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #25
You tell me. I mean, you apparently know more about him than I do. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #27
Haha, It's fun watching your poorly constructed IEDs blow up in your face whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #31
LOL! ProSense Sep 2013 #41
DU rec... SidDithers Sep 2013 #22
Once again whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #35
LMFAO - good one! - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #42
You know what cracks me up? vanlassie Sep 2013 #29
Haha - good one! - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #40
i thought he basically wanted the u.s. to conquer the entire middle east. unblock Sep 2013 #33
yea, but he saw a lot of 'america's interest' in iraq....fuck you bolton spanone Sep 2013 #34
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #36
You could line up all the foolish people who attack your posts for no reason at all ProSense.... NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #43

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
1. David Frum lol
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:27 AM
Sep 2013

If you want to deal with Iran, deal with Iran. And if you want not to be drawn all the way into a Syrian civil war between factions none of them friendly to the United States, then the best way to avoid being drawn is: don't take the first step. And if you have already inadvisedly taken the first step, at least beware the second, third and fourth.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/03/opinion/frum-syria-four-questions/

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
7. It's instructive to read everyone's comments. All of them. Don't you think. Even Bolton.
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:32 AM
Sep 2013

Doesn't mean you have to agree or even give merit to their statements.

But it does show various angles.

former9thward

(31,961 posts)
4. Since you are trying to smear anti-Syrian war people...
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:31 AM
Sep 2013

Why don't you post the positions of Bush, Cheney, Rove, McCain, etc.? Or don't you want to be in bed with them?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
14. Get a grip. I did no such thing. There
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:38 AM
Sep 2013

...are many people weighing in on this issue. Here is Wesley Clark's:

Wesley Clark: Syria vs. Kosovo

Wesley Clark

<...>

As in the case of Syria today, there was no United Nations resolution explicitly authorizing NATO to bomb Serbia. But NATO nations found other ways, including an earlier U.N. Security Council Resolutionpage 105, to legally justify what had to be done. In Syria, the violation of the 1925 Geneva prohibition against the use of chemical weapons is probably sufficient justification. (The fact that Russia used chemical weapons in Afghanistan in the 1980s should be used to undercut Russian objections to strikes against Syria today.)

Kosovo also reminds us that it isn't imperative to strike back immediately after a "red line" is crossed. In 1998, NATO had established a red line against Serb ethnic cleansing; the Serbs crossed that line with the massacre of at least 40 farmers at Racak in January 1999. But NATO didn't strike immediately. Instead, France took the lead for a negotiated NATO presence. This strengthened NATO's diplomatic leverage and legitimacy, even though the talks failed.

<...>

At a time when the U.S. faces many other security threats, not to mention economic and political challenges at home, it is tempting to view action against Syria's regime as a significant distraction. Certainly, it also carries risks. A year after Saddam was bombed in 1993, he deployed Republican Guard Divisions to Iraq's southern border into the same sort of attack positions they had occupied before the invasion of Kuwait in 1990. A few years later, the Republican Congress passed, with Democratic support, a resolution advocating "regime change." You can't always control the script after you decide to launch a limited, measured attack.

But President Obama has rightly drawn a line at the use of chemical weapons. Some weapons are simply too inhuman to be used. And, as many of us learned during 1990s, in the words of President Clinton, "Where we can make a difference, we must act."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/08/29/syria-wesley-clark-kosovo-nato/2726733/

Obama Open To Narrowing Language That Would Authorize Syria Strikes
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023586008


 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
20. Full list of your RW allies:
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:44 AM
Sep 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023586304#post17

See? Two can play the self-referential blue-linky game.

How's it feel being in bed with the likes of Norm Coleman?

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
28. Any bed that has Norm Coleman AND Max Boot (and Elliott Abrams) in it is
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:55 AM
Sep 2013

no bed I want any part of whatsoever. Just Ugh!

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
37. So you're admitting to being "in bed" with at least one "Neocon," and projecting
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 11:02 AM
Sep 2013

your position onto me?

former9thward

(31,961 posts)
44. I have no idea of whether Yoo is anti-war or pro-war.
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 11:19 AM
Sep 2013

I don't read him and I don't care what he thinks. I don't object to the posting of any opinions. That is not my thing. But when you post a Bush era official as being opposed to war then you must know there are plenty with the opposite opinion.

JHB

(37,157 posts)
6. And if he were in a Prez Romney administration...
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:32 AM
Sep 2013

...he's be crowing about an already-happening bombing, and the plans for a ground "intervention".

 

DontTreadOnMe

(2,442 posts)
9. Isn't John Bolton a NeoCon
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:33 AM
Sep 2013

I guess that spoils the idea that Obama is siding with the NeoCons.

This vote has some strange bedfellows... the Far Left siding with Paul Rand and the Teabaggers.

John McCain siding with Hillary and Obama... etc.

The trend I see is the groups most vocal against Obama seems to also be against any action in Syria, as if we need to be on the opposite side of an Obama decision. The Libertarians are so blinded that they feel they can spin any decision opposite Obama as the "good side".

The "progressive" left... (shit, I consider myself Progressive, but I am for action in Syria).. is 90% opposed to any action... I never bought into the "death is death" argument... death by chemicals is a war crime, the worst kind of war crime.

I can see the case for the argument that these "moral" wars are costly, and we just can't afford it. Someone posted that we should fix Detroit before we fix Syria -- and I agree! But then I also feel that if we let the use of chemical weapons slide, even just once - it IS going to happen again. Maybe it will happen anyway... but the NEXT time might be a lot worse. A chemical attack in a major city could kill hundreds of thousands in one day... don't ever under estimate how large a chemical attack can reach a city population.

Crimes against humanity, are crimes against the world. War is always hell, but humans have at least to draw a bottom line in war... and that line is chemical weapons.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
18. whatchamacallit: "Since we're playing the A-hole Bedfellows game..."
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:40 AM
Sep 2013

Is that the game you're playing?

I mean, not all despicable assholes have come out against the strike.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023583127

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
24. whatchamacallit: "Since we're playing the A-hole Bedfellows game..."
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:51 AM
Sep 2013

"Crazy how you won't own your tactics"

That was your comment, and you apparently and hypocritically refues to "own your tactics."

That being: projection.

 

blazeKing

(329 posts)
15. The right and left are unified against war
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:38 AM
Sep 2013

The only ones left are the 9% the polls say..which are the extreme Obama butt kissers and old people that just like watching war on fox news. The right is unified against war because it's Obama. The left is unified against war because we don't think bombing for peace or helping the al Qaeda rebels is a good thing.


Sorry.

 

DontTreadOnMe

(2,442 posts)
19. I think you will see it is 50/50 when the vote actually happens
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:44 AM
Sep 2013

The current public polls don't mean anything... they ask the questions so they get their polls numbers exactly how they want them. I don't trust ANY polls any more....

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
17. List of all the RW assholes on record supporting a Syria strike:
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:39 AM
Sep 2013

Ammar Abdulhamid
Elliott Abrams
Dr. Fouad Ajami
Dr. Michael Auslin
Gary Bauer
Paul Berman
Max Boot
Ellen Bork
Ambassador L. Paul Bremer (Interim Iraqi 'Authority')
Matthew R. J. Brodsky
Dr. Eliot A. Cohen
Senator Norm Coleman
Ambassador William Courtney
Seth Cropsey
James S. Denton
Paula A. DeSutter
Larry Diamond
Dr. Paula J. Dobriansky
Thomas Donnelly
Dr. Michael Doran
Mark Dubowitz
Dr. Colin Dueck
Dr. Nicholas Eberstadt
Ambassador Eric S. Edelman
Reuel Marc Gerecht
Abe Greenwald
Christopher J. Griffin
John P. Hannah
Bruce Pitcairn Jackson
Ash Jain
Dr. Kenneth Jensen
Allison Johnson
Dr. Robert G. Joseph
Dr. Robert Kagan
Lawrence F. Kaplan
Jamie Kirchick
Irina Krasovskaya
Dr. William Kristol
Bernard-Henri Levy
Dr. Robert J. Lieber
Senator Joseph I. Lieberman
Tod Lindberg
Dr. Thomas G. Mahnken
Dr. Michael Makovsky
Ann Marlowe
Dr. Clifford D. May
Dr. Alan Mendoza
Dr. Joshua Muravchik
Governor Tim Pawlenty
Martin Peretz
Danielle Pletka
Dr. David Pollock
Arch Puddington
Karl Rove
Randy Scheunemann
Dan Senor
Ambassador John Shattuck
Lee Smith
Henry D. Sokolski
James Traub
Ambassador Mark D. Wallace
Michael Weiss
Leon Wieseltier
Khawla Yusuf
Robert Zarate
Dr. Radwan Ziadeh

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-iraq-supergroup-reunion.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
23. Evidently,
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:49 AM
Sep 2013

"List of all the RW assholes on record supporting a Syria strike:"

...the "RW asshole" in the OP is against it.

The list was prior to Obama seeking Congressional approval, and that seems to have pissed off some on the list:

Lieberman: ‘Our enemies are cheering’ after Obama consulted Congress on Syria
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014582663

https://twitter.com/MaxBoot

unblock

(52,163 posts)
33. i thought he basically wanted the u.s. to conquer the entire middle east.
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 11:00 AM
Sep 2013

oh, wait. obama's in office.

that changes his views on everything.

Response to ProSense (Original post)

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
43. You could line up all the foolish people who attack your posts for no reason at all ProSense....
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 11:15 AM
Sep 2013

And then you'd have a big line of 'em.



K/R

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Bolton: I’d ‘vote no...