True or False: We would've supported Bush had he done this

[NightWatcher]

He wanted to attack a Middle Eastern country with no real goals or objections but merely to punish them for something that conflicting reports say they did or didn't do.

Our closest ally, the Brits, checked with their representatives and said, "we're not in your coalition of the willing this time".

The biggest supporters of this strike are Saudi Arabia and Israel.

The Congressional representatives who support this strike consist of Boner, McSame, Graham, Lieberman...

10 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	No way would we have supported Bush in this situation
	10 (100%)
	Of course DU would've rallied behind Bush, our Commander in Chief
	0 (0%)
	Other:?
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[JoePhilly]

1. Is it before or after he invaded Iraq?

[YarnAddict]

2. Apples & oranges

Bush was not a legitimately elected President. President Obama was elected, and re-elected, by an overwhelming majority. We entrusted the security of the country, and the entire world, to him. We need to continue to trust him.

[NightWatcher]

5. Just keep telling yourself that it's not the same

regardless of what it looks like, sounds like, or feels like

[Marrah_G]

7. ??????????????

The lengths people will go to justify this shit is endless.

[YarnAddict]

10. Just saying

we kno what Bush's motivations were. I'm sure that this president has something other than war PROFITS behind his decisons.

[Avalux]

13. WTF are you talking about?

Doesn't matter who is in office; it's the circumstances that matter. What I've been presented thus far regarding Syria does not justify military action.

[leftstreet]

3. No way. Not McCain or Romney either n/t

[Jefferson23]

4. I don't think you even need to ask this question.

But my answer is, no..not a chance.

[Poll_Blind]

6. A question worth answering. K&R! nt

PB

[treestar]

8. Those aren't compelling reasons

We might have - in this case Bush would have had proof of actual use of chemical weapons. The goal is to make use of chemical weapons unacceptable.

[whatchamacallit]

9. What? So far the administration's proof isn't any more compelling than BushCo's n/t

[treestar]

11. It has been established

There are actual dead bodies, medical reports they died from gas, and the injured's symptoms.

[whatchamacallit]

12. What hasn't been established enough to neutralize conflicting reports and accounts

is who the perps where.