General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGoing to war with other nations is NOT analogous to being in a school yard fight.
Senator Menendez tried to use his anecdote about a schoolyard bully to make his case for strikes against Syria.
Anyone who relies on these anecdotes, which are not analogous to going to war with another nation in size, character, scope, or substance, is a moron.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)"We need to go to war because Hitler, the Founding Fathers and 300 Spartans!!11"
(on edit: none of these things are "mythology" per se, but the narratives usually are.)
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)While important to look at history and derive its lessons thereof, I do agree when it's used frivolously and the point made is tenuous at best.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)They are not meant to be accurate. They are designed to stimulate the ideas of mythological heroism that were instilled in people in their childhood.
Might as well say "we need to go to war to save the Ewoks from Darth Vader" or "it will be like when He-Man defeated Skeletor". Would serve the same purpose.
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)asshole talking down to people.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)In fact you didn't even attempt to do so. You just stated an opinion and offered nothing whatever to support it. If you wish to convince anyone you have to say WHY the two circumstances are not analogous. Furthermore, declaring that anyone who doesn't share your opinion is a moron, is itself moronic. Especially when your argument left out critical elements necessary to make a compelling argument.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)altercation. My opponent's critical infrastructure for transportation, food distribution, and medical care remained unaffected even after the tussle.
The analogy between war and a school yard anything is moronic, juvenile, and beneath the thinking folks at D.U.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Evidence is necessary to show they are comparable situations, not the other way around.
The person making the analogy needs to convine the rest of us that it isn't just abstraction, prevarication.
Otherwise it gets reduced to silliness, such as:
Sometimes the bus is late but there'll be 2 at the same time pretty soon, just you wait.
I just told you that a new romance = a bus
Really, you really demand that I disprove a new romance = a bus? How stupid would that be?
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Why is one not analogous of the other? How many seconds do you need to think of reasons?
For the schoolyard bully, mass casualties aren't an issue.
For the schoolyard bully, motivations of self-defense are quite simple.
For the schoolyard bully, to compare to a nations, it's like the bully has just bullied himself, and a bigger bully (the US) is intervening to punish him.
For the schoolyard bully, there's not a danger of escalation and vendettas over generations, affecting the lives of millions of people.
For the schoolyard bully.
That's only what I could think of in a few minutes. Really, do you need this one argued? The two are so extremely unalike that analogies between them can't be very close, and neither can applicable moral equivalencies be drawn.
Sometimes a post is just a declaration asking that people who agree say so and give their arguments. It's okay from the simple fact that always making such arguments is like having to reinvent the wheel every time you want to drive a car.
And that's a better analogy than the school yard bully comparison.
marmar
(77,073 posts)Dios mio !!!!!
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)It really didn't require further explanation as to why a schoolyard bully and going to war with another nation is not analogous.
I don't have to explain why the sun creates warmth, do I?
malaise
(268,930 posts)Sad to say but the US is out of control. This planet needs more than one superpower.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Definitely agreed.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)schoolyard bully analogy.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Some preachers love them, too.
A poorly fitting analogy is often used as euphemism, such as in this case.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)we are going to deliver retribution for the use of WMD's
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)What you are typing is vapid hyperbolic nonsense.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)"act of war" does not equate to "Declaration of War"
and using WMD's on his own people gives us legal standing to deliver some retribution!
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Applying international law, if a nation invades or bombs another nation, it is termed a casus belli which translates into "incident of war." Logic is really not your strong suit, eh?
But let's give 'em some good old 'Murican retribution!
Why don't you just go have a beer with George Dubya?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)is not call for your personal attacks.
btw ,,,you still did not show that an act of War (incident of War) is a declaration of war.
you can't because they two very different things.
,,,and I have never voted anything but democratic
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Because that is the exact analogy he made last night.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)... but maybe I shouldn't have when he tried to compare the Left and the Right in terms of why this nation is cycling the drain.
Meh, I'll leave him to his opinion - I still like the guy, but he hedges his bets a little too much for my liking.