Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTDB: Gun Fanatics Score Big Victory in North Carolina
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/04/gun-fanatics-score-big-victory-in-north-carolina.htmlFor years, police officers in North Carolina had a choice when it came to confiscated guns. They could use them for law enforcement purposestraining, testing, examiningor they could destroy them.
But a new law passed by Republican lawmakers in the state changes that. Police officers can still use confiscated guns, but as of this week, they cant destroy them. Instead, if a department wants to get rid of a gun, it has to sell it or auction it. Effectively, men and women who once worked to keep guns off of the streets must now moonlight as gun dealers.
Crafted by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and passed at the urging of the National Rifle Association, the specifics of the Save the Gun law are straightforward. When faced with confiscated guns, law enforcement agencies must either donate, keep, or sell the items to licensed firearm dealers. The only guns that can legally be destroyed are those that are damaged or missing serial numbers, the latter an indication the gun was stolen. (In practical terms, that group doesnt add up to many weapons; nationwide, stolen guns account for just 10 to 15 percent of those used in crimes.)
As for what law enforcement thinks? After ALEC developed this proposal in 2011, the Fraternal Order of the Police, a national labor union, said that it preferred discretion when it came to dealing with confiscated weaponsa reasonable position. In North Carolina, the Sheriffs Association, a trade group, declined to comment on the measure while it faced debate in the legislature. Still, its hard to imagine that local police are happy with a law that not only limits their options but also blocks judges from ordering the destruction of weapons used in a crime. Indeed, theres something perverse about forcing a police department to sell guns that may have been used for assault or murder.
But a new law passed by Republican lawmakers in the state changes that. Police officers can still use confiscated guns, but as of this week, they cant destroy them. Instead, if a department wants to get rid of a gun, it has to sell it or auction it. Effectively, men and women who once worked to keep guns off of the streets must now moonlight as gun dealers.
Crafted by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and passed at the urging of the National Rifle Association, the specifics of the Save the Gun law are straightforward. When faced with confiscated guns, law enforcement agencies must either donate, keep, or sell the items to licensed firearm dealers. The only guns that can legally be destroyed are those that are damaged or missing serial numbers, the latter an indication the gun was stolen. (In practical terms, that group doesnt add up to many weapons; nationwide, stolen guns account for just 10 to 15 percent of those used in crimes.)
As for what law enforcement thinks? After ALEC developed this proposal in 2011, the Fraternal Order of the Police, a national labor union, said that it preferred discretion when it came to dealing with confiscated weaponsa reasonable position. In North Carolina, the Sheriffs Association, a trade group, declined to comment on the measure while it faced debate in the legislature. Still, its hard to imagine that local police are happy with a law that not only limits their options but also blocks judges from ordering the destruction of weapons used in a crime. Indeed, theres something perverse about forcing a police department to sell guns that may have been used for assault or murder.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 678 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TDB: Gun Fanatics Score Big Victory in North Carolina (Original Post)
OmahaBlueDog
Sep 2013
OP
I don't see any problem here. What is required for other confiscated property?
badtoworse
Sep 2013
#2
Locrian
(4,522 posts)1. gee wiz
So I wonder if maybe the wife /spouse of a cop that gets shot with one of these guns gets first dibs?
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)2. I don't see any problem here. What is required for other confiscated property?
There is no reason (other than emotional appeal) to put confiscated firearms in a different category.
JCMach1
(27,553 posts)3. Does the law prevent police from damaging these guns?
would seem like a logical work around...
Damage then destroy...