General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNPR's Morning Edition had both sides of the Syria argument represented this morning
Both the crazy right winger side, and the totally loony Libertarian side: John McCain and Rand Paul. There was apparently no reason to have anybody to the left of McCain in on the discussion.
Fuck NPR.
http://www.npr.org/2013/09/04/218811159/in-senate-rand-paul-and-john-mccain-differ-on-strikes-in-syria
dkf
(37,305 posts)Are you sure that person won't eventually be moved to vote "for" it of "loyalty"?
corkhead
(6,119 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)but I am not comfortable having my side of the equation solely represented by Rand Paul.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Only Alan Grayson perhaps. One Dem...sad.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Why is Rand Paul elevated to "big name" but no actual left of center democrat> USA Today managed to identify Grayson as a spokesperson for the left, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/09/02/syria-congress-guide-obama-pelosi-mccain/2754963/
but not NPR.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)Or will they tone it down out of deference to Obama?
corkhead
(6,119 posts)and they use Rand Paul to show their audience (that may only have a casual understanding of the situation) that there is no serious opposition to us going to war. Early polls show that opposition is wide, but my perception is that also shallow and the numbers could be shifted with the help of the lapdog corporate press.
just my $.02
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)rurallib
(62,406 posts)that in America the media ranges from the right wing to the extremely right wing