Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:13 PM Sep 2013

Citing Need For More Information, Markey Votes ‘Present’ On Syria Resolution To Authorize Force

Citing Need For More Information, Markey Votes ‘Present’ On Syria Resolution To Authorize Force

Newly-elected Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) raised a lot of eyebrows Wednesday afternoon when he voted "present" on a resolution to authorize military strikes in Syria, a position advocated by his predecessor Secretary of State John Kerry, who testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the very same day.

“A `no’ vote would have indicated I had sufficient information on which to base the decision. Which I did not," Markey explained after the vote, as quoted by the Boston Globe.

“I want to make sure I make an informed, correct vote,” he added. “The people of Massachusetts expect their senators to have analyzed all the facts, and I want to make sure I have all the facts before I cast that vote.”

The committee ultimately passed a revised authorization for military action in Syria, including new language effectively making regime change the goal of the intervention, by a margin of 10 - 7, with Markey voting present.

- more -

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/markey-voted-present-on-syria-resolution-due-to



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Citing Need For More Information, Markey Votes ‘Present’ On Syria Resolution To Authorize Force (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2013 OP
effectively making regime change the goal of the intervention, warrant46 Sep 2013 #1
no new evidence but plenty of new language Supersedeas Sep 2013 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Citing Need For More Info...