Cornyn's convenient change of heart (on Syria)

[ProSense]

Cornyn's convenient change of heart

By Steve Benen

In March Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) appeared at an event in Atlanta, and publicly endorsed U.S. intervention in Syria. Then President Obama expressed support for military strikes in Syria, at which point Cornyn reconsidered.

Indeed, in a curious twist, the Texas Republican said this week "many questions are still left unanswered," which led to a meeting with the president in the White House in which Cornyn asked no questions.

All of which leads us to now.

A Cornyn aide said Thursday that the senator currently opposes the Syria resolution, which will be debated on the Senate floor next week.

"If the vote were held today, Sen. Cornyn would vote no," said Megan Mitchell, a spokeswoman for Cornyn.

The immediate significance of this is that Cornyn is the first leading congressional Republican to express opposition to authorizing the use of force. In the House, the top two GOP leaders -- House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor -- endorsed the resolution earlier this week, while in the Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is too afraid to say much of anything.

But it's the larger context of announcements like these that stand out.

Kevin Drum had a gem on this yesterday.

There's obviously a bit of hypocrisy on both sides in this affair, but I have to say that watching Republican pols and conservative pundits get on their high horses about Syria has been pretty nauseating. These are guys who mostly have never met a war they didn't like, and until a few months ago were practically baying at the moon to demand that that President Obama stop diddling around and get serious about aiding the rebels and taking out the monstrous Bashar al-Assad. But now? Butter wouldn't melt in their mouths as they talk piously about the value of multilateral support; the need to give diplomacy a chance; the perils of regional blowback; the lessons of Iraq; and the fear of escalation if Assad retaliates. You'd think they'd all just returned from a Save the Whales conference in Marin County.

There are some Republicans who are perfectly serious about their desire not to get entangled in yet another Middle Eastern conflict. But most of them couldn't care less. Obama is for it, so they're against it. It's pretty hard to take.

- more -

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/09/06/20358092-cornyns-convenient-change-of-heart

[David__77]

1. Well, this is good news indeed.

Sen. Cornyn is feeling the heat and the will of the people. His office is more important to him that supporting fantasies.

[cali]

2. I'll take the votes against a military strike on Syria

whatever the motivation behind those votes are. It doesn't mean I support Cornyn who remains a nasty piece of work or support other repukes voting against it. It means that if it helps defeat this AUMF, that's a damned good thing.

Fuck bombing Syria.

[Thinkingabout]

3. Cornyn is just another pipsqueak. I personally do not like wars, when so many were dying in Iraq

I would get sick to my stomach so any avoidance is good. It is now time for the GOP to get real and put their big guns down, they have been played by the best, Obama, Kerry and Hagel deserves Oscars for their performance, it is working in your favor.

[magical thyme]

4. are you suggesting that the President is using "reverse psychology" on the GOP?

That he really doesn't want to strike Syria, but knew that if he said that, they'd impeach him or call him names for "inaction," so instead tried drumming up support for a strike so that they could vote it down?

[Number23]

5. The NY Times piece on this sums up Repub opposition as well as the public's reluctance

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/the-bush-burden/?_r=2&

I've been saying for weeks that the main reason for so much angst over this issue is because Bush poisoned the well with his illegal immoral war. And of course Repubs are against intervention singularly because the president believes it's the right thing to do. That's all they need to hear.

[UTUSN]

6. R#1 & K for, there are NO principles involved with these weasels, they will do anything-Opposites nt