General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have heard it all before.
I heard Kerry talking about the consequences to Jordan, Saudi Arabia and others if the Assad regime wasn't stopped.
I heard that if the American people had access to the intelligence the President has, we would support the bombing.
I heard that we have to do this to convince Iran that we mean business.
I heard that we have to bomb Syria or we will lose our "credibility".
I heard all these things in similar form in 1968 when State Department Officials were trying to defuse the effects of the Teach-Ins which definitively exposed the intellectual bankruptcy of the rationales for the Vietnam War.
It was not persuasive then, it is not persuasive now.
gopiscrap
(23,756 posts)pushed on us about Iraq....I thinks it's so that we make sure we don't cut the military budget
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Senator John C. Stennis (Dixiecrat Mississippi) on 05/03/1967
Oh wait,...we have.
KG
(28,751 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)chieftain
(3,222 posts)It would completely renew my faith in our system.
Lately, I don't believe that the people in America have a voice in how the country is run.
Washington is all about Washington. The rest of the country is a second thought.
That's why bombing Syrians is more important than jobs in America.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Kablooie
(18,626 posts)That's the new word from the NY times.
I'm waiting for the "Mission Accomplished" banner that will signal the start of a new 10 year war.