General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCongress Members Who Have Seen Classified Evidence About Syria Say It Fails to Prove Anything
Congressman Justin Amash said last week:
What I heard in Obama admn briefing actually makes me more skeptical of certain significant aspects of Press case for attacking
He noted yesterday, after attending another classified briefing and reviewing more classified materials:
Attended another classified briefing on #Syria & reviewed addl materials. Now more skeptical than ever. Cant believe Pres is pushing war.
Congressman Tom Harkin said:
I have just attended a classified Congressional briefing on Syria that quite frankly raised more questions than it answered. I found the evidence presented by Administration officials to be circumstantial.
Congressman Michael Burgess said:
Yes, I saw the classified documents. They were pretty thin.
More at: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/classified-intelligence-doesnt-prove-anything.html
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Link Speed
(650 posts)I wish those guys would just hop on the bandwagon and stop being speedbumps along the road to righteousness.
KnR
durablend
(7,460 posts)There's people we need to bomb democracy into. Stop stalling!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)As for the Republicans, not even going to bother.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)You may be the one quoting Harken out of context. I think he was saying that if Assad used chemical weapons then a military response is required. Otherwise the contradiction makes no sense at all.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)with an if
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Harken must be contradicting himself. The two statements, as you read them, make no sense.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Included it would not agreed with thread subject.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Did Harken or did he not say, "I found the evidence presented by Administration officials to be circumstantial."
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Very misleading and is this what you want? If it the result you want then run with it but the complete statement by Harkin is readily available.
dsc
(52,155 posts)it is from a McCain statement later in the same article.
eomer
(3,845 posts)I have just attended a classified Congressional briefing on Syria that quite frankly raised more questions than it answered. I found the evidence presented by Administration officials to be circumstantial. The atrocious use of chemical weapons against civilian is an affront to human values and a violation of international law. It should be condemned by the international community as a whole," liberal Democrat Tom Harkin says in a statement released after today's classified Capitol Hill briefing.
The coming debate in Congress will hopefully shine the light on outstanding questions -- as will the results of the U.N. inspection team. We must wait for these results before any action is taken. What I hear from Iowans is that the Middle East has a complex history and the conflicts there will not be solved by U.S. military action alone. We should not rush into what may become a new open-ended war without broad international backing or a full understanding of the ramifications.
On the flip side, Obama will have some work in the other direction if he wants to convince some hawks that attacking Syria is a good idea.
We believe President Obama is correct that the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons requires a military response by the United States and our friends and allies. Since the President is now seeking Congressional support for this action, the Congress must act as soon as possible," said Republicans John McCain and Lindsey Graham in a statement released yesterday.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/harkin-classified-syria-briefing-frankly-raised-more-questions-it-answered_751549.html
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Any kind of crappy "evidence" will do just fine.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)The MIC need more business.
So... "Any kind of crappy "evidence" will do just fine."
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Javaman
(62,520 posts)Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)this does not instill confidence with the administrations case IMO. We shall see what more evidence is presented the next few days however.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)When offering false evidence, that doesn't prove my premise, the fewer people
who know about the lying the better.
so presto! it's "classified". how handy is that?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
''As the builders say, the larger stones do not lie well without the lesser.'' ~Plato