General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew York Times Oped - On Syria Vote, Trust, but Verify By ALAN GRAYSON
WASHINGTON THE documentary record regarding an attack on Syria consists of just two papers: a four-page unclassified summary and a 12-page classified summary. The first enumerates only the evidence in favor of an attack. Im not allowed to tell you whats in the classified summary, but you can draw your own conclusion
But by refusing to disclose the underlying data even to members of Congress, the administration is making it impossible for anyone to judge, independently, whether that statement is correct. Perhaps the edict of an earlier administration applies: Trust, but verify.
The danger of the administrations approach was illustrated by a widely read report last week in The Daily Caller, which claimed that the Obama administration had selectively used intelligence to justify military strikes in Syria, with one report doctored so that it leads a reader to just the opposite conclusion reached by the original report.
The allegedly doctored report attributes the attack to the Syrian general staff. But according to The Daily Caller, it was clear that the Syrian general staff were out of their minds with panic that an unauthorized strike had been launched by the 155th Brigade in express defiance of their instructions.
I dont know who is right, the administration or The Daily Caller. But for me to make the correct decision on whether to allow an attack, I need to know. And so does the American public.
read full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/opinion/on-syria-vote-trust-but-verify.html?hp&_r=5&
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)msongs
(67,354 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)Keep digging Al!