Congress Denied Syrian Facts, Too (Robert Parry, Consortiumnews)
"While seeking authority for a limited war with Syria, the Obama administration withheld from the American people the U.S. intelligence on the alleged chemical weapons attack of Aug. 21, amid assurances that Congress got all the secret details. But that doesnt appear to be true, reports Robert Parry."
...
"Then, on Aug. 30, 2013, when the Obama administration released its Government Assessment of Syrias alleged poison gas attack, the white paper stated, We intercepted communications involving a senior official intimately familiar with the offensive who confirmed that chemical weapons were used by the regime on August 21 and was concerned with the U.N. inspectors obtaining evidence.
However, the identity of the senior official was not included, nor was the direct quote cited. The report claimed concerns about protecting sources and methods in explaining why more details werent provided, but everyone in the world knows the United States has the capability to intercept phone calls.
So, why didnt the Obama administration go at least as far as the Bush administration did in putting out transcripts of these phone intercepts? A reasonable suspicion must be that the actual words of the conversation and possibly other conversations would have indicated that the Syrian high command was caught off guard by the Aug. 21 events, that the Syrian government was scrambling to figure out what had happened and why, that the intercepts were less incriminating than the paraphrase of them."
full article
----------------------
I'm really curious to (finally) see the detailed evidence the US has on the table of the UNSC, as the EU has demanded.