Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pirate Smile

(27,617 posts)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:36 AM Feb 2012

Ha'aretz article says Netanyahu met group of US senators/reps & asked them to"pressure Obama"on Iran

Also LAT: "Obama likely to resist pressure to further toughen Iran stance" - article below.


Netanyahu will urge Obama to publicly back attack on Iran, sources say
Intensive preparations underway to ensure a successful meeting between the two leaders next week in Washington, despite lack of trust between two sides.


-snip-
Officials in both Jerusalem and Washington acknowledge a serious lack of trust between Israel and the United States with regard to the issue of a possible strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. A senior U.S. official who is involved in preparing Netanyahu's visit to the United States - and who asked to remain anonymous - said intensive preparations are underway to guarantee the success of the meeting between Netanyahu and Obama and to bridge this lack of trust.

-snip-
According to sources, the lack of trust between Israeli and U.S. officials appears to stem from, among other things, a mutual feeling that the other country is interfering in its own internal political affairs. Netanyahu suspects that the U.S. administration is attempting to turn Israeli public opinion against an attack on Iran, say sources.
Meanwhile, they say, the Obama administration suspects Netanyahu is using Congress and the Republican candidates in the presidential race to put pressure on Obama to support such a strike.

-snip-
The Obama administration's suspicions concerning Netanyahu were further fueled after Netanyahu and his advisers briefed a group of senators and senior congressmen during the past two weeks on the Iranian issue, and asked them to pressure Obama on the matter. Last week, Netanyahu met a group of five senior senators over lunch, headed by Sen. John McCain, who ran four years ago against Obama for president. Netanyahu reportedly told the senators he was not interfering in U.S. politics and expected U.S. officials not to interfere in Israeli politics either.

The topic quickly turned to Iran, according to reports. Netanyahu apparently complained bitterly about certain officials in the Obama administration who spoke out against an Israeli strike on Iran. But between the lines, some suggest that Netanyahu was speaking about Obama himself, as well as the other very senior officials in the administration. He reportedly told the senators that this kind of public discourse serves the Iranians.

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-will-urge-obama-to-publicly-back-attack-on-iran-sources-say-1.415428?localLinksEnabled=false



Obama likely to resist pressure to further toughen Iran stance
The Israelis, along with GOP presidential hopefuls and senators and some hawkish Democrats, want Obama to keep Iran from potentially building a nuclear weapon.


By Paul Richter and Christi Parsons, Los Angeles Times

February 28, 2012, 6:06 p.m.

Reporting from Washington— The White House indicated Tuesday that President Obama would resist pressure for a tougher Iran policy coming from Israel and some U.S. lawmakers who argue that Tehran should not be allowed to acquire even the capability to eventually develop a nuclear weapon.

-snip-
The Israelis, along with Republican presidential hopefuls, GOP senators and some hawkish Democrats, want Obama to move toward that Israeli position. They all believe he is politically vulnerable to charges of being weak on Iran and have stepped up their pressure in recent days as Obama prepares for his meeting with Netanyahu and a speech he is scheduled to give Sunday to the country's largest pro-Israel lobbying group.

-snip-
The Senate sponsors "want to say clearly and resolutely to Iran: You have only two choices — peacefully negotiate to end your nuclear program or expect a military strike to end that program," Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), one of them, told a news conference. The Senate has not voted on the proposed resolution.

-snip-
As Obama campaigns for reelection, Republicans sense a potential issue in charges that he is weak on Iran and inattentive to a threat against Israel's existence. The four contenders for the GOP nomination all denounced Obama's Iran policy as dangerous during a debate Wednesday in Arizona.
"This is going to be the key foreign policy question of the election," said a senior Senate aide who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to comment. "With Iraq wound up and Obama's strong overall record on counter-terrorism, the only area where the Republicans have breathing room is Iran and Israel."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-us-iran-20120228,0,6892812.story


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ha'aretz article says Netanyahu met group of US senators/reps & asked them to"pressure Obama"on Iran (Original Post) Pirate Smile Feb 2012 OP
Netanyahu is stupid OR this is all political maneuvering to get Obama out. tabatha Feb 2012 #1
You hypocritical piece of horses**t Netanyahu. Dawson Leery Feb 2012 #2
I initially included in the OP that Bibi makes me want to punch a wall but Pirate Smile Feb 2012 #3
Gum-flapping BS! "Somebody said, that somebody may have said..." Behind the Aegis Feb 2012 #4
So will they register as agents of a foreign power? Faryn Balyncd Feb 2012 #5
Why? Should every congressperson who mets with foreign dignitaries do this? Behind the Aegis Feb 2012 #6
Depends on what they discuss about parkia00 Feb 2012 #11
Time for that "Clean Break', but not the one Bibi plans. leveymg Feb 2012 #7
Fuck off, warmonger. And take Lieberman with you. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2012 #8
kick Pirate Smile Feb 2012 #9
I would HOPE Cosmocat Feb 2012 #10

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
1. Netanyahu is stupid OR this is all political maneuvering to get Obama out.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:45 AM
Feb 2012

The ME will take care of itself.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
2. You hypocritical piece of horses**t Netanyahu.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:51 AM
Feb 2012

You tell Obama to stay out of Israeli "internal affairs". saying that Obama should not have met with Shimon Peres

Netanyahu also believes that Obama's scheduled meeting with President Shimon Peres during the upcoming AIPAC conference constitutes an attempt by the United States to interfere in Israel's internal affairs, say sources. Netanyahu's suspicions were apparently heightened by last week's report in Haaretz that Peres will tell Obama that he objects to an Israeli attack on Iran. Since then, the relations between Netanyahu and Peres have been tense. Peres denied the reports, but Netanyahu and his staff do not seem to completely believe his denials. Peres and Netanyahu met on Friday and again yesterday, just as Peres was set to leave for the United States. The two worked hard to show an atmosphere of "business as usual," according to a source.

Yet, you Benny boy have met with the neo-cons in the US to get them to force Obama into supporting you
unjustified military action.

Pirate Smile

(27,617 posts)
3. I initially included in the OP that Bibi makes me want to punch a wall but
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:55 AM
Feb 2012

I decided to leave that out and just let the articles speak for themselves.

It.Is.Infuriating.

Behind the Aegis

(53,944 posts)
4. Gum-flapping BS! "Somebody said, that somebody may have said..."
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 02:02 AM
Feb 2012

Journalism today SUCKS! Too much "speculation" quoted as "fact."

Behind the Aegis

(53,944 posts)
6. Why? Should every congressperson who mets with foreign dignitaries do this?
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 02:53 AM
Feb 2012

Last edited Wed Feb 29, 2012, 03:55 AM - Edit history (1)

parkia00

(572 posts)
11. Depends on what they discuss about
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 10:26 AM
Feb 2012

If they are discussing about ways in which to push the nation that they as congress critters are supposed to serve into another war against another country on behalf of a third country, ignoring the death and destruction and the betrayal of every armed forces personal and their families who serve, for personal benefit; then yes. In fact it would be treason. But then again these are congress critters.

Cosmocat

(14,561 posts)
10. I would HOPE
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 09:01 AM
Feb 2012

that after Iraq, only just now getting out of it, people won't be so easily ginned up about screwing around with Israel.

Could republicans be any bigger arsehats?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ha'aretz article says Net...