Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skraxx

(2,970 posts)
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:51 AM Sep 2013

If It Turns Out We Avoid Intervention in Syria, What Will All The Screamers of Warmonger! Here Do?

Will they admit Obama played this well? That the threat of force was used judiciously to precipate a Diplomatic solution?

Or will they hail Putin and Russia as the heroes despite the "Warmonger" Obama?

Will they ignore what may ultimately turn out be a brilliantly played diplomatic coup and pretend it didn't happen?

Now, the latest revelations that Russia is calling on Syria to give up is CW's could lead nowhere, and we may end up getting involved militarily, but I think it's certainly an indication that there's more going on behind the scenes than we are privy to, and that perhaps a threat of force, used judiciously, is an effective diplomatic tool, if used wisely.

Thankfully, I believe we have leaders, like Obama and Kerry, who use threats of force wisely, and will, I believe, pull back from the brink if there is reasonable progress.

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If It Turns Out We Avoid Intervention in Syria, What Will All The Screamers of Warmonger! Here Do? (Original Post) Skraxx Sep 2013 OP
Put fools like you on Ignore? GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #1
IOW, Cling To Your Hatred Of Obama Regardless, And Stick Your Head in the Sand! Skraxx Sep 2013 #3
They'll LOVE you over in the BOG MNBrewer Sep 2013 #26
What, we're supposed to ignore all that we've heard, and just say, "all's well that ends well"??? reformist2 Sep 2013 #48
It isn't Obama that is hated, it is the War Mongering, no matter who does it. Bandit Sep 2013 #64
When you write an attack OP like this AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #70
Your comment madamesilverspurs Sep 2013 #55
Did you read the OP? AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #72
I'll assume our voices were heard. phantom power Sep 2013 #2
Yes! YOU Stopped A War! Skraxx Sep 2013 #4
You sound much more like a monarchist than a Democrat phantom power Sep 2013 #14
You May Refer To Me as "Yer Majesty" Skraxx Sep 2013 #15
No, sorry I don't think that is the term I will use HangOnKids Sep 2013 #35
You Mean Regal Day Skraxx Sep 2013 #37
No HangOnKids Sep 2013 #39
Seems like your little theory has been shot down. By the State Dept no less Autumn Sep 2013 #5
Umm, That Shoots Down Nothing Skraxx Sep 2013 #13
Good job! Autumn Sep 2013 #16
Pooty will still be made out to be a hero, HappyMe Sep 2013 #6
Well, I'll just celebrate Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #7
+10 avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #60
that would be awesome! G_j Sep 2013 #8
Huh? atreides1 Sep 2013 #9
and then admit you got played....if it occurs...Obama was counting on your VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #40
Obama opened that can of worms, we didn't leftstreet Sep 2013 #10
So He'll Still Be a "Warmonger" to You, Even if there's No War? Skraxx Sep 2013 #17
wtf are you talking about? leftstreet Sep 2013 #19
You Tell Me Skraxx Sep 2013 #20
Make me n/t leftstreet Sep 2013 #22
I See You're Maturity Level is at a Level I Find Myself Incapable of Reaching Skraxx Sep 2013 #24
'your' not you're leftstreet Sep 2013 #29
perhaps that sentence is also the title of a book (?) KurtNYC Sep 2013 #36
This is Priceless HangOnKids Sep 2013 #46
reality check, they just happen to be mongering G_j Sep 2013 #27
jingoist BlueToTheBone Sep 2013 #52
I'll certainly be relieved, but no I don't think it will be possible to cali Sep 2013 #11
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #18
Admitting they were wrong wouldn't be an option n/t michigandem58 Sep 2013 #12
I will be thankful there is no war. Where will the bloodlusters turn their attention? The Link Sep 2013 #21
See....there you go...keep up the faith... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #32
This OP violates the alleged SOP of GD. Are the hosts of GD always absent? All these Meta OP's need Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #23
How so? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #33
It's whining about DU and the faults the OP sees in all the sinners around him here. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #54
WoW...then I have seen a shitload of that around here for weeks... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #56
Then you too should comment on it when you see it. Note the OP is locked from this thread for the Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #62
K&R. I suspect they'll give credit to Putin and move on to the next outrage! FSogol Sep 2013 #25
What will you do if he does strike Syria? NCTraveler Sep 2013 #28
What I wonder is hfojvt Sep 2013 #30
Pretend they were behind Obama all along! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #31
Obvious troll thread is obvious NuclearDem Sep 2013 #34
1-5 against locking Capt. Obvious Sep 2013 #53
Fortunately, we have the people who oppose war by cowboy presidents to thank. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #38
We'll say "thank god he did the right thing but it shouldn't have taken this much effort" LibAsHell Sep 2013 #41
What will they do? bravenak Sep 2013 #42
celebrate .... mike_c Sep 2013 #43
That's easy - they will go back to being outraged about the boxes in Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #44
We'll say you warmongers got caught with your pants down, Raksha Sep 2013 #45
Obama played this well? Haha! LittleBlue Sep 2013 #47
I would love it if this was the intended result all along for the admin. I don't think it was. stevenleser Sep 2013 #49
They are going hail Putin and Russia JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #50
Wow!! Buddaman Sep 2013 #51
Historically, when war is averted those who opposed the war call that sweet victory. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #57
You're suggesting that if Obama fails to persuade congress to attack Syria, he should get credit? Donald Ian Rankin Sep 2013 #58
They'll credit Pooty-Poot treestar Sep 2013 #59
+1 JoePhilly Sep 2013 #63
Welcome to my ignore list nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #61
Are you all in a kerfunkle Nadin? DevonRex Sep 2013 #68
If war is averted felix_numinous Sep 2013 #65
I suppose they'll have to battle it out with those who felt we HAD to punish hughee99 Sep 2013 #66
They'll hail Vlad as a Peacenik. DevonRex Sep 2013 #67
If that happens, I will never have beenj so happy to have been wrong n/t markpkessinger Sep 2013 #69
Celebrate we were right and Obama was wrong? avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #71

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
26. They'll LOVE you over in the BOG
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:08 PM
Sep 2013

I, on the other hand won't have to read any more of your idiotic posts.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
64. It isn't Obama that is hated, it is the War Mongering, no matter who does it.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 01:06 PM
Sep 2013

Including people on this board.. What could possible be accomplished by a very limited strike on Syria except further feathering the nests of the Military Contractors and their bought and paid for political candidates.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
70. When you write an attack OP like this
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:19 PM
Sep 2013

You should have a thick skin, because you will get called out on it

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
14. You sound much more like a monarchist than a Democrat
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:00 PM
Sep 2013

It's not about "my" voice, it's about our voices.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
6. Pooty will still be made out to be a hero,
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:56 AM
Sep 2013

for some reason.

Name calling will continue, come the next issue.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
7. Well, I'll just celebrate
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:58 AM
Sep 2013

and leave the whole business of attribution up in the air where it belongs. There are just too many players, and too many potentially catastrophic (and perhaps necessary) risks being taken, for any single person or policy to carry the whole weight of praise or blame.

For one thing, how do you distinguish a brilliant diplomatic coup from a change of course necessitated by a worldwide revulsion on the part of the common people against another war?

atreides1

(16,073 posts)
9. Huh?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:58 AM
Sep 2013

How about everything worked...why does credit have to be given to any one person or organization?

Why not just accept the fact that it was a combination of many efforts to avoid a regional conflict?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
40. and then admit you got played....if it occurs...Obama was counting on your
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:17 PM
Sep 2013

lack of support to pull it off!

leftstreet

(36,106 posts)
10. Obama opened that can of worms, we didn't
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:59 AM
Sep 2013

If he and Kerry went into this worried they'd be called 'warmongers,' then they should have rethought their strategy

leftstreet

(36,106 posts)
19. wtf are you talking about?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:04 PM
Sep 2013

You're not making any sense

US foreign policy is essentially 'warmonger' by nature, regardless of the politicians in charge of its media presentation

Skraxx

(2,970 posts)
20. You Tell Me
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:05 PM
Sep 2013

Since it's your nonsensical comment that started it, don't be surprised if there's further nonsense that flows from it.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
36. perhaps that sentence is also the title of a book (?)
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:15 PM
Sep 2013

ETA: could be the sequel to "I'm Okay, You're Okay" -- "I'm Okay, I See You're Maturity Level is at a Level I Find Myself Incapable of Reaching"

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
46. This is Priceless
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:25 PM
Sep 2013

Despite your misuse of YOU'RE this might be the most honest thing you have posted.

G_j

(40,366 posts)
27. reality check, they just happen to be mongering
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:10 PM
Sep 2013

as we speak. That happens to be the reality.

war·mon·ger
ˈwôrˌməNGgər,-ˌmäNG-/
noun
1.
a sovereign or political leader or activist who encourages or advocates aggression or warfare toward other nations or groups.
synonyms: militarist, hawk, jingoist, aggressor, belligerent More
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
11. I'll certainly be relieved, but no I don't think it will be possible to
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:59 AM
Sep 2013

credit the President with "playing this well". It's been weeks of this issue overshadowing other compelling issues. It's strained U.S. relationships. In other words, it's been a mess and that will still be true even if the U.S. doesn't strike Syria.

In any case, your op is full of ridiculous and false claims.

No one here has "hailed Putin and Russia as heroes" in regards to this.

As for that lying asshole John Kerry, he's an embarrassment.

Response to cali (Reply #11)

 

The Link

(757 posts)
21. I will be thankful there is no war. Where will the bloodlusters turn their attention?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:06 PM
Sep 2013

Where will you want to the bombs to drop?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. This OP violates the alleged SOP of GD. Are the hosts of GD always absent? All these Meta OP's need
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:07 PM
Sep 2013

to stop hosts, even those with which you agree. Or Skinner should simply remove the SOP and any pretense of standards of any kind.
Barf.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
54. It's whining about DU and the faults the OP sees in all the sinners around him here.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:50 PM
Sep 2013

Meta was closed for a good reason, the SOP of GD says 'no whining about DU' for a good reason.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
62. Then you too should comment on it when you see it. Note the OP is locked from this thread for the
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 01:00 PM
Sep 2013

personal nature of comments made in the thread about DUers. OP's about DU and DUers are against the Statement of Purpose of GD. I did not write them, the admins did. OP's about other DUers are inherently divisive and I support the admins statement that such OPs are not welcome in GD.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
28. What will you do if he does strike Syria?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:11 PM
Sep 2013

What would you like the people who are against a strike in Syria to do, sit there and shut up. Launching missiles is truly a death sentence for many and an international game-changer all in the name of American Citizens. With the rhetoric coming from the White House those opposing this should be "screaming". Your op is truly offensive and shows your inability to differentiate between personalities and blowing people to smithereens with no clear objective.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
30. What I wonder is
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:11 PM
Sep 2013

If it turns out that flying pigs break the sound barrier, do I need duck tape to protect my windows from a sonic boom, or should I just switch to linux anyway?

If the Syrian issue is resolved, my guess is that it will not take long for Obama to defend NSA again in a statement or for Greenwald to write another article or for Obama to refuse Manning's pardon request or for Obama to offer another cut to social security and thus for GD to be, once again, filled with posts declaring the absolute perfidity of Obama and the Democratic Party smattered with a few feeble attempts by boggers to spin the latest outrage.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

LibAsHell

(180 posts)
41. We'll say "thank god he did the right thing but it shouldn't have taken this much effort"
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:18 PM
Sep 2013

It's hilarious you actually believe they were just posturing. If Congress had been on board immediately, we'd probably be launching missiles by now.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
42. What will they do?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:19 PM
Sep 2013

They have plenty of things to hate about Obama. Everything is his fault. He ruined America. Obamacare isn't exactly what they want. He won't be doing something fast enough. Or nuanced enough. Or use the bully pulpit to force congress to do something or other. He killed baby Jesus. And smiles too much. He evolves. He pre killed the economy. Before he was president. He also didn't invite them to the killer parties he throws with jay-z and Beyonce. He doesn't read their minds so that he knows exactly what they want to hear. They miss Bush.

Raksha

(7,167 posts)
45. We'll say you warmongers got caught with your pants down,
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:24 PM
Sep 2013

and are revealed for the liars you are in front of the whole world, starting with the Warmonger-in-Chief.

Nobody is going to give Obama credit for a brilliant multi-dimensional chess move. We'll say he was forced to save his ass (and his country's) any way he could. I think he deserves impeachment even if we avoid military involvement is Syria.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
47. Obama played this well? Haha!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:26 PM
Sep 2013

Yeah, backing yourself into a corner with this red line BS, then having to backtrack and taking a political beating in the process, that's well played.




What will I do? I'll be happy that outside forces stopped Obama from intervening in another pointless Middle Eastern war.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
49. I would love it if this was the intended result all along for the admin. I don't think it was.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:28 PM
Sep 2013

I'll settle for no war with the WMD being taken from Assad.

JustAnotherGen

(31,811 posts)
50. They are going hail Putin and Russia
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:39 PM
Sep 2013

I'm already seeing it on another thread. . . They seriously think anyone is better than Obama and ALL have a moral high ground that Mr. Dreg (Obama) of Society can only hope to obtain.

Buddaman

(503 posts)
51. Wow!!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:43 PM
Sep 2013

Don't recall reading anything here that would be considered warmongering....that includes Obama's stand on Syria. I think solving this thru diplomacy is a win win for everyone....DIPLOMACY is what it is, a true political way of solving issues, what sucks is the dog and pony show to get there.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
57. Historically, when war is averted those who opposed the war call that sweet victory.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:54 PM
Sep 2013

The people who have called for war that is rejected soundly by the majority will continue to lose standing. That's another victory for reason and diplomacy.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
58. You're suggesting that if Obama fails to persuade congress to attack Syria, he should get credit?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:57 PM
Sep 2013

Obama has actively tried to persuade the US to bomb Syria.

If that's the wrong decision - and I think it probably is - then if he fails, that just makes him inept as well as wrong.

I don't for a minute think that he's playing three dimensional chess; I think he genuinely wants to attack Assad's military, and if he fails to persuade Congress to do so then I will credit Congress for that, not him.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
65. If war is averted
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 02:42 PM
Sep 2013

I will be grateful that the warmongers and war profiters were not successful
this time.

Human rights are NOT left-right issues-- although the RW never fail trying to make it so.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
66. I suppose they'll have to battle it out with those who felt we HAD to punish
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 02:45 PM
Sep 2013

Syria to send some sort of message, and then turned around and decided if we can just get them to give up the REST of their chemical weapons, it's all good.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
67. They'll hail Vlad as a Peacenik.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 02:46 PM
Sep 2013

The savior of the free world. The champion of human rights. Russia as the shining light of democracy.

And call us worshipers who are blinded by something or another, unable to see truth.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
71. Celebrate we were right and Obama was wrong?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:19 PM
Sep 2013

The ant-war sphere was right. THIS was negotiable. The President should thank us!


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If It Turns Out We Avoid ...