Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:29 PM Sep 2013

Hillary Clinton: Russian Proposal On Syrian Weapons ‘An Important Step’

Hillary Clinton: Russian Proposal On Syrian Weapons ‘An Important Step’

In her first public comments on the debate over whether or not to use military force in Syria, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Monday that an idea floated by her successor —and seemingly accepted by both Russia and the Assad regime – could be "an important step."

<...>

"First , as the president has said, the Assad regime's inhuman use of weapons of mass destruction against innocent men, women and children violates a universal norm at the heart of our global order," Clinton said. "And therefore, it demands a strong response from the international community, led by the United States.

"Second, the international community cannot ignore the ongoing threat from the Assad regime's stockpiles of chemical weapons — whether they are used again against Syrian civilians or transferred to Hezbollah or stolen by other terrorists," she continued. "This is about protecting both the Syrian people and our friends in the region. The world will have to deal with this threat as swiftly and comprehensively as possible."

Clinton then addressed comments made by current Secretary of State John Kerry, who suggested Monday that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad could avoid a military strike if he surrenders his chemical weapons..."Now, if the regime immediately surrendered its stockpiles to international control, as was suggested by Secretary Kerry and the Russians, that would be an important step," Clinton said. "But this cannot be another excuse for delay or obstruction. And russia has to support the international community's efforts sincerely or be held to account. It is very important to note that this discussion that has taken hold today about potential international control over Syria's stockpiles only could take place in the context of a credible military threat by the United States to keep pressure on the Syrian government as well as those supporting Syria like Russia."

- more -

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/hillary-clinton-russian-proposal-on-syrian-weapons-important

"the first acknowledgment by the Syrian government that it even possesses chemical weapons"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023630685

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton: Russian Proposal On Syrian Weapons ‘An Important Step’ (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2013 OP
Looking increasingly like we're not dismissing the Russian proposal out of hand DeltaLitProf Sep 2013 #1
It has to appear 'off the cuff' to protect Russia's role in all of this. blm Sep 2013 #2
So you're implying that the CW attacks were part of US plan? GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #5
Not at all. blm Sep 2013 #6
What "other steps" could there POSSIBLY be except regime change? David__77 Sep 2013 #3
to what end? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #4
it would be great if we could get RUssia to back a UN proposal JI7 Sep 2013 #7
After accepting $500K jewelry from Saudis... HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #8

DeltaLitProf

(768 posts)
1. Looking increasingly like we're not dismissing the Russian proposal out of hand
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:31 PM
Sep 2013

The state department's walkback of Kerry's remark as "off the cuff" concerned me that we were just reverting to Cold War reflex and snubbing this proposal.

But now the deputy National Security Advisor and the ex-Sec of State have both said this is an idea we'll be taking seriously.

Very encouraging.

blm

(113,037 posts)
2. It has to appear 'off the cuff' to protect Russia's role in all of this.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:35 PM
Sep 2013

Interesting that now Assad is arriving at the point where US and Russia wanted him to be before the chem attacks.

I don't subscribe to 'coincidence' theory at this level of high stakes.

http://www.rferl.org/content/syria-lavrov-kerry-geneva/25071543.html

blm

(113,037 posts)
6. Not at all.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:45 PM
Sep 2013

Just that there was a political opportunity for Russia here to let it play out to the point where they had the opening to get Assad to where they and the US always intended him to be.

David__77

(23,367 posts)
3. What "other steps" could there POSSIBLY be except regime change?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 03:37 PM
Sep 2013

This is nonsensical. The chemical weapons were always purely incidental. This is about geopolitics.

JI7

(89,244 posts)
7. it would be great if we could get RUssia to back a UN proposal
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 04:30 PM
Sep 2013

to do something to get rid of the weapons.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton: Russian ...