Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:48 PM Sep 2013

So it looks like Obama's objective will likely be achieved

What was his objective? To prevent Syria from using chemical weapons again.

If Syria does indeed put their stockpiles of chemical weapons under international supervision, his objective will be achieved.

A win for the Syrian people.

A win for the United States.

A win for the international community.

Obama and Kerry played this perfectly and without lifting a finger militarily against Syria, something which most of the country is opposed to.

Well done, guys.

Well. Fucking. Done.



208 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So it looks like Obama's objective will likely be achieved (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 OP
Yep. Well done Mr. President. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #1
Is there a link to this? nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #156
I have no link. I was saying this in the hopes he will take the deal. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #159
Sorry, my question should have been directed at the OP. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #163
Not all things posted here are from a link madokie Sep 2013 #207
Obama told NBC News in an interview Monday that he remains skeptical that Syria will follow through totodeinhere Sep 2013 #2
Which, taken in context, is a perfect way to keep the pressure on Putin and Assad. tridim Sep 2013 #83
How do you know its working? Nothing has happened yet and as I ready said totodeinhere Sep 2013 #167
Well,read this and tell me what you think...please. I snappyturtle Sep 2013 #201
You bet it is madokie Sep 2013 #208
His objective is regime change LittleBlue Sep 2013 #3
Link? Hekate Sep 2013 #6
Link? There the thousands of them. former9thward Sep 2013 #11
That is from 2011. This article written in 2013 says regime change is not the goal Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #18
Why would they change their minds? former9thward Sep 2013 #23
Obama didn't indicate his goal was for a regime change in 2011. He said Assad should step aside lumpy Sep 2013 #126
That is up to the Syrian people. former9thward Sep 2013 #147
Obama statement from 2011 was not calling for a regime change, his statement was to the effect lumpy Sep 2013 #115
No, he did not say that. former9thward Sep 2013 #146
here's one notadmblnd Sep 2013 #12
Who are you going to believe FrodosPet Sep 2013 #80
Overarching negotiated transition- is that supposed to be a bad thing ? lumpy Sep 2013 #127
No, someone asked for a link notadmblnd Sep 2013 #140
Link? Where is the link in the OP? nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #157
White House: We're not seeking 'regime change' as goal in Syria Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #7
Not seeking except when they are. former9thward Sep 2013 #13
Assad goes and a general from his army steps in. NOT REGIME CHANGE. Why this is so hard KittyWampus Sep 2013 #17
Assad isn't going anywhere. former9thward Sep 2013 #20
Well, you just answered your own statement. R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2013 #104
That crystal ball is rolling again lumpy Sep 2013 #132
Through a POLITICAL SOLUTION karynnj Sep 2013 #32
Assad isn't going anywhere. former9thward Sep 2013 #48
thank you arely staircase Sep 2013 #75
I think it won't be long sulphurdunn Sep 2013 #105
I'm serious. former9thward Sep 2013 #144
Indeed . . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #51
Assad stepping down, could that be a bad thing? A replacement couldn't be any worse. lumpy Sep 2013 #130
What has changed since 2011? former9thward Sep 2013 #149
Right, just like he wasn't for insurance mandates LittleBlue Sep 2013 #26
and he's gonna cut social security!!!!111 arely staircase Sep 2013 #46
What in the world are you on about? LittleBlue Sep 2013 #50
lol arely staircase Sep 2013 #55
BOG People: In all seriousness, this is why you catch so much heat. Maedhros Sep 2013 #195
+1 QC Sep 2013 #204
Trust us Charlie Brown. We arent seeking a "regime change" this time. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #158
His goal is categorically NOT REGIME CHANGE> Sorry for all caps but it has been stated ad naseum KittyWampus Sep 2013 #15
Correct. It was John McCain that said AtomicKitten Sep 2013 #38
If you're going to keep using the phrase, spell it correctly - ad NAUSEAM Divernan Sep 2013 #78
Why are you being disingenuous? R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2013 #106
Assad does need to go. How that is accomplished is the question. lumpy Sep 2013 #133
Alright. At least that is honesty. R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2013 #134
You prefer Al-Qaeda to Assad? lark Sep 2013 #200
That is correct. David__77 Sep 2013 #33
Yeah...regime change...or give up the WMD's....it is pretty simple VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #36
We are arming Syrian rebels LittleBlue Sep 2013 #43
Doesn't seem like that is going to happen now does it? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #44
regime change huh? pasto76 Sep 2013 #81
I think people are counting their peace dividends long before they reach maturity. leveymg Sep 2013 #102
He made it very clear when this all began that regime change was NOT his goal. pnwmom Sep 2013 #120
Post 12- Susan Rice explicitly states regime change. nt LittleBlue Sep 2013 #135
That's exactly what I said. Regime change would be the result of pnwmom Sep 2013 #142
What does that have to do with what I wrote? LittleBlue Sep 2013 #145
You referred to post 12, which linked to a tweet. Did you even read it? pnwmom Sep 2013 #148
And that can only happen when the rebels start winning LittleBlue Sep 2013 #152
Obama didn't want regime change to occur right now, because there is no obvious pnwmom Sep 2013 #155
Straight from Obamas mouth, no doubt. lumpy Sep 2013 #122
Susan Rice, post 12. nt LittleBlue Sep 2013 #137
Well Then... cynzke Sep 2013 #179
Obama's objective was to recover from his dumb ass red line remark.... bowens43 Sep 2013 #4
You really can't accept success, can you philosslayer Sep 2013 #37
What are you basing that on? What success? I pity those that worship Pres Obama to rhett o rick Sep 2013 #160
In due time philosslayer Sep 2013 #164
So you havent seen "success" yet? And your statement about rhett o rick Sep 2013 #166
As opposed to the unbiased "worship" mythology Sep 2013 #171
Is it necessary to twist my words to get your point across? If you will notice rhett o rick Sep 2013 #177
Boy bowens43, you just feel monumentally fucked-up rury Sep 2013 #56
And that spin is one of the symptoms of Type 2 ODS MNBrewer Sep 2013 #63
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #5
No kidding. When I shut the boob-toob off the bobble-heads were still... Hekate Sep 2013 #9
Hekate, the poster you're agreeing with is slamming the President's supporters Number23 Sep 2013 #181
Whoopsie Hekate Sep 2013 #190
How many types of ODS are there Andy823 Sep 2013 #52
Type 1: Tea Party associated ODS MNBrewer Sep 2013 #54
Interesting Andy823 Sep 2013 #66
I don't know anything about types 3 or 4. MNBrewer Sep 2013 #73
+1! sheshe2 Sep 2013 #77
+2 bravenak Sep 2013 #153
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Sep 2013 #85
but what about all the fuel wasted steaming ships over toward Syria? Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #8
At the very least the ships should have been wind-powered to save on oil Hekate Sep 2013 #10
They were wind-powered when I was in the Navy. WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2013 #29
John Paul Jones, I presume? Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #35
Sir Francis Drake! Is that you? L0oniX Sep 2013 #88
Obama should have pulled those ships himself! Whisp Sep 2013 #124
You win the thread! freshwest Sep 2013 #202
Then he should withdraw the request for an AUMF Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #14
That would be the stick from the carrot and stick approach. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #19
Except if it loses then he loses his stick. Publically. LOUDLY! Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #22
I instinctively knew this was their objective.. Cha Sep 2013 #16
No, having Assad give up his chemical weapons was the Russians' idea. Even Obama himself totodeinhere Sep 2013 #168
OMFG. This was not the used war salesman in chiefs plan: grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #21
apparantly assad in more easily threatened by the US Navy than at first suspected arely staircase Sep 2013 #53
See, threats of strikes iamthebandfanman Sep 2013 #24
Obama was playing 3D chess while his detractors were playing checkers mwrguy Sep 2013 #25
lol fascisthunter Sep 2013 #31
I tried to warn them... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #39
Yep Tx4obama Sep 2013 #47
type 2.. frylock Sep 2013 #68
This board! BumRushDaShow Sep 2013 #79
LOL, sure he was. OK! n-t Logical Sep 2013 #138
i really hope it works out JI7 Sep 2013 #27
If that was indeed the master plan, I wish we somehow were in on it. NT onlyadream Sep 2013 #28
then it wouldn't have worked... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #41
And it definitely wasn't the first time. mimi85 Sep 2013 #95
absolutely right... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #96
clumping ashes together to build a house fascisthunter Sep 2013 #30
A very small minority of us has been saying that for days. philosslayer Sep 2013 #34
Yep...the tempo around here sure has changed dramatically since last night... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #42
Well done, indeed! Can't understand why the naysayers never learn. appacom Sep 2013 #178
good job mr. president arely staircase Sep 2013 #40
it`s promising but we will see if it works. madrchsod Sep 2013 #45
K&R flamingdem Sep 2013 #49
Brilliant planning. rug Sep 2013 #57
Politico likes to spin against the Obama admin. It was Kerry's idea: Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #59
It was Kerry talking out loud. rug Sep 2013 #60
Correct. Kerry spoke Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #61
Lol. First, Kerry was answering a question. Are you saying the question was planted? rug Sep 2013 #64
It was Kerry who floated the idea... Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #67
He was asked a question. He answered off the top of his head. Sorry, this is not von Clausewitz. rug Sep 2013 #84
Politico is not a friend lumpy Sep 2013 #136
LOL. Is Faux your friend? nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #162
So it was Kerry, without the Presidents knowledge, who got this done? nt. NCTraveler Sep 2013 #194
Are you surprised there was such a question? karynnj Sep 2013 #90
It was a rather vague question. Are you saying Kerry was prepped to provide the answer? rug Sep 2013 #92
No absolutely not karynnj Sep 2013 #154
He did and last week he had the discussions Iliyah Sep 2013 #103
Isnt telegraphindia a right wing conspiracy sight? nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #161
That depends upon whether it supports the narrative or counters it. Maedhros Sep 2013 #196
Good point. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #197
It appears some of the posters raising hell about going to war are now crying and making Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #58
America is PISSED about a war and he finds another solution. Who gets credit for that? n-t Logical Sep 2013 #139
You kinda figured who found another solution so it would be probably Obama and his team. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #172
pee wee herman diplomacy.. frylock Sep 2013 #62
rofl Vattel Sep 2013 #94
Heh... SaveOurDemocracy Sep 2013 #109
Basically. +1 BumRushDaShow Sep 2013 #65
What will you say if the push for a military strike continues? Marr Sep 2013 #69
Succeeded at making an ass of himself Ocelot Sep 2013 #70
We'll see if that's how it goes, won't we? Scootaloo Sep 2013 #71
Yay!! bravenak Sep 2013 #72
An unintended consiquence of a crappy policy blackspade Sep 2013 #74
One can only hope! n/t Paper Roses Sep 2013 #76
Good news!!!! sheshe2 Sep 2013 #82
Hurrah. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #86
You need to give credit to President Putin, don't you think? another_liberal Sep 2013 #87
Yes, it was Putin's idea. He first raised it with Obama during their brief meeting in totodeinhere Sep 2013 #170
The real threat of an attack no doubt got the Syrian's attention. DCBob Sep 2013 #89
That's what I was wondering last week.. what's assad Cha Sep 2013 #165
Chemical Weapons are Naughty but Everyone Gets a Freebie!!! NoOneMan Sep 2013 #91
I can't tell if you're serious or not. If serious, you are delusional. n/t SylviaD Sep 2013 #93
I wonder what the NEXT wave of anti-Obama DU flak will be. BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2013 #97
The blab is disturbing. Indeed lumpy Sep 2013 #141
I will wait until it actually happens before I break out the champaign. nt Javaman Sep 2013 #98
According to you Caretha Sep 2013 #99
That wasn't all. It was to eliminate them. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #100
This thread is sad. Marr Sep 2013 #101
Well I don't know. Look at all the folks that have been cheering about the... Tx4obama Sep 2013 #107
I don't think they were cheering because Obama would be a lame duck. Marr Sep 2013 #112
yep noiretextatique Sep 2013 #180
This could be the finest diplomatic achievement since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis BlueEye Sep 2013 #108
It is not at all obvious that we didn't arrive at this point by accident. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #110
I'm hoping this works out for the best rpannier Sep 2013 #111
"Russia seizing the upper hand..." WTF rpannier?? rury Sep 2013 #117
Played? You've got to be kidding. caseymoz Sep 2013 #113
Cali is on my full block list. So why am I seeing this BS? blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #114
I support anything LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #116
People often underestimate the President citizen blues Sep 2013 #118
Well, we aren't out of the woods yet. morningfog Sep 2013 #119
Not so fast. OldRedneck Sep 2013 #121
That assad will sign the anti chemical treaty is part of the deal lumpy Sep 2013 #143
Wow, so Syria agreed to turn over the chems? TroglodyteScholar Sep 2013 #123
If that had been Obama's objective, it would have made far more sense to achieve winter is coming Sep 2013 #125
And its driving the Combustible Hair Club crazy! JoePhilly Sep 2013 #128
No, his objective is to hand Syria over to al Qaeda. HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #129
I'm betting a lot of you would be saying "Well. Fucking. Done" whatever happened. RedCappedBandit Sep 2013 #131
Oh my God. Skip Intro Sep 2013 #150
What could have happened for which you would NOT say "well done"? GoneFishin Sep 2013 #151
What a difference a day makes. FedUpWithIt All Sep 2013 #169
And this all came out just in time for his speech on Tuesday. Kablooie Sep 2013 #173
Kick n/t politicasista Sep 2013 #174
Mission isn't accomplished until that pipeline is in the ground - TBF Sep 2013 #175
Until it actually happens I wouldn't be breaking out the champaign just yet. Javaman Sep 2013 #176
K&R for the folks that have actually become INCONTINENT at the mere thought of giving Number23 Sep 2013 #182
Lets wait to see how this plays out before giving out either credit or blame. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #185
What you so tellingly call the "Russian proposal" is referred to as Obama/Putin negotiations Number23 Sep 2013 #186
No, I was using the language used by most news outlets. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #187
Nonsense. Do you have any idea how easy it is to restart the chem program? BlueStreak Sep 2013 #183
Are you SERIOUS???!!!! BrainDrain Sep 2013 #184
A U.S. official called Secretary of State John Kerry's remarks in Britain on Monday a "major goof," orenbus Sep 2013 #188
It would be very good fortune to have a "major goof" actually lead to a positive outcome, though. Maedhros Sep 2013 #198
One stated objective, anyway. Orsino Sep 2013 #189
K & R Scurrilous Sep 2013 #191
BIG K/R CakeGrrl Sep 2013 #192
Biggest deal thous is that he SET THE PRECEDENT for going to Congress Tumbulu Sep 2013 #193
Obama got very lucky. lark Sep 2013 #199
K&R nt stevenleser Sep 2013 #203
Goal achieved?!?!? Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #205
My last boss was like the puke congress critters madokie Sep 2013 #206
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
1. Yep. Well done Mr. President.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:50 PM
Sep 2013

And John Kerry is a good man despite some of the nasty things said about him.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
207. Not all things posted here are from a link
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 12:39 PM
Sep 2013

many of us can and do think for ourselves.
Thats what the op is doing here in this thread, thinking for themselves and passing it on to the ones of us who can understand what they're saying.

totodeinhere

(13,056 posts)
2. Obama told NBC News in an interview Monday that he remains skeptical that Syria will follow through
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:50 PM
Sep 2013

and turn over its stockpile, so he's taking a statement from Damascus, quote, "with a grain of salt initially."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/09/obama-syria-chemical-weapons_n_3896093.html

Personally, I think the Syrians will use this as a way to stall for more time and perhaps forestall the bombing indefinitely. But I don't think they will turn over their chemical stockpiles. If Assad did that he would lose his best bargaining chip. If I were you I would not right off this crisis just yet.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
83. Which, taken in context, is a perfect way to keep the pressure on Putin and Assad.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:55 PM
Sep 2013

I continue to be impressed with the President's brand of diplomacy. It's something new, and it's working!

totodeinhere

(13,056 posts)
167. How do you know its working? Nothing has happened yet and as I ready said
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:32 AM
Sep 2013

even Obama himself is skeptical. And even if Assad does give up his chemical weapons that region will continue to be a mess, the Syrian civil war will continue and innocent civilians will continue to die and we won't be any closer to seeing peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
208. You bet it is
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 12:42 PM
Sep 2013

each passing day that Assad doesn't use chemical weapons is proof of that.
Our president is one smart cookie and is playing the pukes, haters and racist assholes like the fools they are.
Yup we have them right here on this board too

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
3. His objective is regime change
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:51 PM
Sep 2013

Which is why we were arming rebel groups before any chemical weapons were used

Nice try, though. I always enjoy a good laugh.

former9thward

(31,935 posts)
23. Why would they change their minds?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:05 PM
Sep 2013

Has Assad improved in Obama's eyes? It is because that foreign policy has gone to the trash heap because the Syrian people told the West to shove it.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
126. Obama didn't indicate his goal was for a regime change in 2011. He said Assad should step aside
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:50 PM
Sep 2013

if he continues his brutal attacks against his people. Maybe Assad should step aside to let someone else do a better job of running the country.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
115. Obama statement from 2011 was not calling for a regime change, his statement was to the effect
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:39 PM
Sep 2013

that Assada attacks against his people should stop or it is time for him to step aside.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
80. Who are you going to believe
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:53 PM
Sep 2013

The White House or "The Hill"?

Besides, the tweet was from 1:27pm. That was HOURS ago.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
17. Assad goes and a general from his army steps in. NOT REGIME CHANGE. Why this is so hard
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:01 PM
Sep 2013

for supposedly semi-intelligent DU'ers to grasp is beyond me.

I've typed that ad naseum for days now., FFS.

former9thward

(31,935 posts)
48. Assad isn't going anywhere.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:24 PM
Sep 2013

Politically or militarily. For better or worse he has defeated the West. The Syrian people have spoken and they are not interested in advice or threats from the West.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
75. thank you
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:48 PM
Sep 2013

I literally laughed out loud at your post, not LOLd, but actually laughed. I can't tell if you are being serious, but either way its funny.

again, thanks

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
105. I think it won't be long
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:57 PM
Sep 2013

before you're laughing out of the other side of your face. If you don't think the Russians made a deal to throw the Syrian rebels to the wolves and to maintain the Assad regime you should do a bit more thinking and a lot less laughing.

former9thward

(31,935 posts)
144. I'm serious.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:54 PM
Sep 2013

I have spent time in almost all of the Arabic countries. Most DUers have not been in any for a minute. But they are keyboard generals. A joke.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
130. Assad stepping down, could that be a bad thing? A replacement couldn't be any worse.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:13 PM
Sep 2013

Your post is a rerun of the 2011 report.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
26. Right, just like he wasn't for insurance mandates
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:09 PM
Sep 2013



You do realize that's only his official position, right? The claim that he doesn't want regime change while arming revolutionaries is just bizarre.
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
195. BOG People: In all seriousness, this is why you catch so much heat.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:35 PM
Sep 2013

Policy differences between yourselves and I aside, this is the kind of middle-school-mentality post that really earns the "hero worship" label that you all decry so vehemently.

This post does not address the issue, does not make a good-faith argument (or, really, any argument at all) and invites mockery.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
15. His goal is categorically NOT REGIME CHANGE> Sorry for all caps but it has been stated ad naseum
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:00 PM
Sep 2013

they do NOT want regime change.

DO. NOT. WANT.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
78. If you're going to keep using the phrase, spell it correctly - ad NAUSEAM
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:52 PM
Sep 2013

And I think we all agree with your statement in post 17 above that you've
"typed that ad naseum for days now., FFS."

Ad nauseam is a Latin term for something unpleasurable that has continued "to [the point of] nausea".

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
106. Why are you being disingenuous?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:00 PM
Sep 2013



"Assad needs to go."
-President Barack Obama


As a DUer you are either not being honest to yourself or to everybody else.


Which is it?

lark

(23,061 posts)
200. You prefer Al-Qaeda to Assad?
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 04:36 PM
Sep 2013

Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah make up the majority of the rebels. You want them in charge? There are no good guys there.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
36. Yeah...regime change...or give up the WMD's....it is pretty simple
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:13 PM
Sep 2013

don't understand why you don't get it...

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
43. We are arming Syrian rebels
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:19 PM
Sep 2013

for what reason, then? To secure chemical weapons?

I cannot take the claim "he doesn't want regime change" seriously. It's not even a secret that we, Turkey and Arab Sunni states are backing his overthrow.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
44. Doesn't seem like that is going to happen now does it?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:21 PM
Sep 2013

and Russia supports Assad...so? In light of todays developments you seem to be a bit behind the curve.

pasto76

(1,589 posts)
81. regime change huh?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:54 PM
Sep 2013

good thing we didnt bring all of our stuff home from iraq, or hand it over the the iraqi government. oh wait yes we did.

so unwilling to admit you are wrong you just find new bullshit to spew

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
102. I think people are counting their peace dividends long before they reach maturity.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:40 PM
Sep 2013

He didn't have the votes in the House. Maybe not in the Senate. Simple as that.

You basically nailed it.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
120. He made it very clear when this all began that regime change was NOT his goal.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:43 PM
Sep 2013

That that would depend on a political solution, not a military solution.

Weren't you listening?

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
142. That's exactly what I said. Regime change would be the result of
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:45 PM
Sep 2013

an overarching policy achieved through a POLITICAL solution -- not a military strike.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
145. What does that have to do with what I wrote?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:54 PM
Sep 2013

I doubt he cares how regime change comes, he clearly wants it, as I said.

That is his objective. His blunders have ensured that his real strategic goal of regime change (not elimination of chem weapons) is impaired. He has no casus belli to use direct intervention when he resolves the chem weapons issue, giving Putin what he wanted at the cost of weapons that have already been rendered strategically harmful.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
148. You referred to post 12, which linked to a tweet. Did you even read it?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:58 PM
Sep 2013

Rice: "Our overarching goal is to end the underlying conflict through a negotiated, political transition in which Assad leaves power" #Syria

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
152. And that can only happen when the rebels start winning
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:15 PM
Sep 2013

or annihilate Assad's ability to make war.

Using the chem weapons excuse, Obama could have had 60 days to bomb Assad's forces to rubble. No one would have complained if we shelled Assad's forces instead of Assad's chem weapons. Which senator would complain? If you want to understand the destructive ability of a carrier group, go back and look at how fast Libya's regime crumbled after limited bombing.

Obama's ultimate leverage is off the table once he accepts this. It effectively settles the issue as neither house nor senate will want to revisit this right before an election. This is why Putin proposed it seemingly within minutes of Kerry's gaffe.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
155. Obama didn't want regime change to occur right now, because there is no obvious
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:28 PM
Sep 2013

person to replace Assad. The group with the most power at the moment is connected to al queda, and no one really wants them to now get the upper hand.

cynzke

(1,254 posts)
179. Well Then...
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 11:03 AM
Sep 2013

this would be part of the plan. Get those weapons away from Assad now and ALSO away from any faction that replaces Assad/His Regime in the future.

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
4. Obama's objective was to recover from his dumb ass red line remark....
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:52 PM
Sep 2013

of course the true beleivers will try to spin this monumental fuck up into a win

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
37. You really can't accept success, can you
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:14 PM
Sep 2013

Obama is winning. His tactics have been spot on. Get over it.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
160. What are you basing that on? What success? I pity those that worship Pres Obama to
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:46 PM
Sep 2013

such an extent that they lose total contact with reality.

Let me know when we achieve "success".

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
166. So you havent seen "success" yet? And your statement about
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:09 AM
Sep 2013

"You really can't accept success, can you? Obama is winning. His tactics have been spot on. Get over it." is really bullshit because Obama isnt "winning" and hasnt shown "success".

Come back when Pres Obama HAS SHOWN SUCCESS.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
171. As opposed to the unbiased "worship"
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:44 AM
Sep 2013

You say you feel pity for those who disagree with you, but you clearly aren't interested in a legitimate discussion or willing to consider that you might be wrong.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
177. Is it necessary to twist my words to get your point across? If you will notice
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 09:13 AM
Sep 2013

there are lots of threads here in DU that the Obama Group wont participate in. For example, discussion on the TPP. Seems to me that they are so strongly biased in favor of the President they are afraid to enter these discussions. How sad. And when Michael Hastings ran into a tree, the Group couldnt wait 10 sec. until they started posting that it wasnt Obama's fault. I would hope Democrats would be open-minded, but some are blinded by their idol worship.

rury

(1,021 posts)
56. Boy bowens43, you just feel monumentally fucked-up
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:34 PM
Sep 2013

Over a win for President Obama.
You cannot accept the fact that the president is smart, can you?
No the question is WHY do you have that attitude toward him.
Hmmmmmm....

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
63. And that spin is one of the symptoms of Type 2 ODS
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:43 PM
Sep 2013

that we see so often here in DU. In the BOG especially.

Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Hekate

(90,550 posts)
9. No kidding. When I shut the boob-toob off the bobble-heads were still...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:55 PM
Sep 2013

... calling everything under the Sun a debacle for the President. I'll check again in a few hours.

But as for DU, business as usual for so many. Nothing PBO does or says can possibly be right.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
181. Hekate, the poster you're agreeing with is slamming the President's supporters
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 11:39 AM
Sep 2013

as s/he typically does. Only the president himself gets more criticism.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
52. How many types of ODS are there
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:27 PM
Sep 2013

And are the different stages treatable? I think I have see some here on DU that have gone over the edge completely, so I would think they are beyond treatment. Is there hope for those in the earlier stages of any kind of recovery?

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
66. Interesting
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:45 PM
Sep 2013

So type 3 and 4 must be those who can never post anything but "negative" remarks about the president? The ones beyond help!

Hekate

(90,550 posts)
10. At the very least the ships should have been wind-powered to save on oil
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 06:57 PM
Sep 2013

The shame of it. (also :sarcasm

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
124. Obama should have pulled those ships himself!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:47 PM
Sep 2013

Whats the matter with that lazy man anyway. He's our employee, dammit and we'll treat him like Walmart treats theirs!



lolz

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
22. Except if it loses then he loses his stick. Publically. LOUDLY!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:05 PM
Sep 2013

If he withdraws the request then he can go back later and say, "See! He's cheating!" But if he goes through with a vote and then the vote is "Pound sand!" he won't have that leverage even if video later shows Assad drowning puppies in a wading pool filled with sarin.

Cha

(296,800 posts)
16. I instinctively knew this was their objective..
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:00 PM
Sep 2013

in spite of the reign of terrorizing them on du.

thanks Cali

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
21. OMFG. This was not the used war salesman in chiefs plan:
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:04 PM
Sep 2013

Speaking at a news conference with British Foreign Secretary William Hague, Kerry said that al-Assad “could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week.”

The U.S. secretary of state described that as an impossible scenario.

“He isn’t about to do it,” Kerry said. “And it can’t be done, obviously.”

The State Department later sought to clarify Kerry’s comment as a “rhetorical argument,” and one U.S. official called it a “major goof,” adding that America’s top diplomat “clearly went off script.”

“There is no one in the administration who is taking this Syria proposal seriously,” the official said.

Read more: http://pix11.com/2013/09/09/hillary-clinton-important-step-if-syria-surrenders-chemical-weapons/#ixzz2eQyXInhH

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
24. See, threats of strikes
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:08 PM
Sep 2013

DO work.


well, at least so far so good...



though I wont all the shocked if Syria 'hands them over' only to have another incident happen a couple of months later so the opposition can be blamed .. given how deceitful the syrian government has been (forced raped confessions on TV that were scripted and fake battles with fake victories to boost moral)

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
25. Obama was playing 3D chess while his detractors were playing checkers
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:08 PM
Sep 2013

AGAIN

You'd think that they would learn by now that nobody beats Obama.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
41. then it wouldn't have worked...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:17 PM
Sep 2013

all the Obama Hatred on the left was a requirement for it to work....played y'all like an orchestra full of fiddles.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
96. absolutely right...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:28 PM
Sep 2013

They just cannot see the forest for the trees...namby pamby Democrats that want to play by the Marquis of Queensbury rules....they seem to think you can do this politics thing without getting any hands dirty.


 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
34. A very small minority of us has been saying that for days.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:13 PM
Sep 2013

And now those who were excoriating us for our naivete are silent.

I said "watch and learn". And we all have. Evidently some don't like the taste of crow.

Well done Mr. President. Bravo.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
40. good job mr. president
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:16 PM
Sep 2013

he clearly told putin to get his dog on a leash or he was going to hit it no matter what.

well, played.



madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
45. it`s promising but we will see if it works.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:21 PM
Sep 2013

i guess we`ll have to wait for sure to get all those out from under the bus who were thrown there by the social media pundits.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
57. Brilliant planning.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:35 PM
Sep 2013
Blinken said the proposal did not originate with the U.S. and was not part of an effort by the administration to provide Assad with an opportunity to escape an American strike.

“We literally just heard it about this as you did some hours ago,” he said.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/syria-us-russia-chemical-weapons-96472.html#ixzz2eRRLJHCI
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
59. Politico likes to spin against the Obama admin. It was Kerry's idea:
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:37 PM
Sep 2013

Syria, Russia seize on Kerry plan: give up arms
Offhand proposal sets off flurry

Moscow, Sept. 9: A seemingly offhand suggestion by secretary of state John Kerry that Syria could avert an American attack by relinquishing all of its chemical weapons received a widespread, almost immediate welcome from Syria and Russia.

The UN, the UK and even some Republicans viewed the proposal as a possible way to avoid a major international military showdown.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130910/jsp/foreign/story_17331886.jsp#.Ui5Yvz8edOI

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
60. It was Kerry talking out loud.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:40 PM
Sep 2013
While Blinken suggested the U.S. was taken by surprise by the Russian offer, the Russians appeared to have seized on comments by Secretary of State John Kerry earlier Monday during a news conference in London.

Asked if there is anything Assad could do to avert a military strike, Kerry said: “He could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week. Turn it over, all of it, without delay, and allow a full and total accounting for that. But he isn’t about to do it, and it can’t be done, obviously.”

However, White House officials said Kerry was simple reiterating a longstanding U.S. position and not trying to open a new round of negotiations to stave off a U.S. military response to the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime on Aug. 21.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/syria-us-russia-chemical-weapons-96472.html#ixzz2eRSVD6II


Frankly, it looks like the Russians who are the moving force for peace here.
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
61. Correct. Kerry spoke
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:41 PM
Sep 2013

And Russia listened. It was Kerry's plan that he spoke out loud.

Funny how that works, huh?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
64. Lol. First, Kerry was answering a question. Are you saying the question was planted?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:44 PM
Sep 2013

Second, he replied with an off-hand remark.

Third, the WH had to issue an immediate clarification.

Fourth, it was the Russians who seized sanity from this clusterfuck by making it more than a diffident remark.

Perhaps I'm missing some secret, clever moves.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
67. It was Kerry who floated the idea...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:46 PM
Sep 2013

A million links to politico will not change that fact.

Sorry.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
84. He was asked a question. He answered off the top of his head. Sorry, this is not von Clausewitz.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:55 PM
Sep 2013

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
90. Are you surprised there was such a question?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:04 PM
Sep 2013

Last edited Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:17 PM - Edit history (1)

Note that the UN, Russia and Syria were on board within 3 hours - Russia and the UN with some detailed plans. I suspect Kerry socialized the idea privately

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
92. It was a rather vague question. Are you saying Kerry was prepped to provide the answer?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:07 PM
Sep 2013
When asked by a reporter in London whether there was anything Assad's government could do or offer to stop a military strike, Kerry answered:

"Sure, he could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week - turn it over, all of it without delay and allow the full and total accounting (of it), but he isn't about to do it and it can't be done."


http://news.yahoo.com/tech/

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
154. No absolutely not
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:27 PM
Sep 2013

I was suggesting that a question of what could Assad do that would cause the US to change its mind on attacking is a pretty obvious question that someone would in some form ask.

I don't think Kerry was prepped - other than by the major speeches Obama had him give, 5 Sunday shows, and the many hours of testimony, followed by the many meetings - and the individual side meetings. If he can handle 5 Sunday shows - at least two unfriendly - with apparent ease, I doubt he needs to be prepped.

The answer was actually obvious - the cause of our attack is chemical weapon use and the goal to remove some chemical weapons. What other answer works?

What I was surprised by was Kerry's uncharacteristic pessimism - making it seem that this had been floated before privately and unsuccessfully.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
103. He did and last week he had the discussions
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:41 PM
Sep 2013

with the Iraselis. The administration knew about this last week.

Politico is a goper rag.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
196. That depends upon whether it supports the narrative or counters it.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:43 PM
Sep 2013

I'm guessing it's a trusted source this time?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
58. It appears some of the posters raising hell about going to war are now crying and making
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:36 PM
Sep 2013

Other accusations, just goes to show maybe the right man is in the WH. It is reasons this outcome proves again the reason for the Nobel Pease award is going to the right man.

BumRushDaShow

(128,438 posts)
65. Basically. +1
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:44 PM
Sep 2013

Let's hope that Pootie holds Baby Asad's feet to the fire and then maybe O can tell Poot that he can "keep the Super Bowl ring".

[font size="1"](am wondering if any of this is related to hoc "side conversations" that happened between O & P)[/font]

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
69. What will you say if the push for a military strike continues?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:46 PM
Sep 2013

I would like nothing more here than to see a strike averted and Syria's chemical weapons neutralized. It'd be a wonderful outcome, undeniably.

I remain convinced that this was never about Syria's chemical weapons-- not really. If Syria complies her and the push for war continues, I think that point would be pretty well proven.

 

Ocelot

(227 posts)
70. Succeeded at making an ass of himself
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:46 PM
Sep 2013

The Democrats weren't behind his push for war (as he all thought we would lockstep) and he had to retreat. He and Kerry were caught in their lies and forced to realize the American people weren't all watching American Idol and not paying attention to their Syria bullshit.

Score one for the American people, hopefully. Now we'll see him retaliate by passing his top-secret Trans Pacific Partnership revenge on our economy before leaving office.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
71. We'll see if that's how it goes, won't we?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:46 PM
Sep 2013

The administration has spent a hell of a lot of effort convincing the US public and media and congress about the absolute and immediate need to blow shit up in Syria. You don't do that unless you actually mean it. What's clear to me is that Putin caught the administration by surprise on this one.

I'll hold out praise for when the administration de-escalates its rhetoric. Judging from Susan Rice's recent comments, I might have a while to wait, yet.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
89. The real threat of an attack no doubt got the Syrian's attention.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 07:59 PM
Sep 2013

and I think President Obama cant give that up until there is an actual deal and verification that the chemical weapons are turned over.

Cha

(296,800 posts)
165. That's what I was wondering last week.. what's assad
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:00 AM
Sep 2013

thinking about all these threats of an attack? Hoping that it would make a difference in future would be attacks.

"The real threat of an attack no doubt got the Syrian's attention.

and I think President Obama cant give that up until there is an actual deal and verification that the chemical weapons are turned over."


Exactly, DCBob

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
91. Chemical Weapons are Naughty but Everyone Gets a Freebie!!!
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:05 PM
Sep 2013

That's right folks, for a limited time, blast away your undesirables. But just know, our Secretary of State will say mean things about you until you get rid of the rest of your stash! Act now for your "get out of war for crossing the Red Line card".

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
97. I wonder what the NEXT wave of anti-Obama DU flak will be.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:30 PM
Sep 2013

I haven't gotten into discussions on this one because I know it's way too behind the scenes and complex for me to have any idea. I know I don't know; I'm not gonna pontificate over some opinion I cook up based on belligerent assumptions. All I felt I could offer, if I were to say something, were hopes for a good outcome.

Not a popular stance on DU.


But it did always seem out of character that President Obama would suddenly turn into a bewsh-style idiot.



The jumping to negative conclusions before all the info is known seems familiar here over the last 6 years. And the hate-ons for anyone who wasn't brandishing torches and pitchforks against him--not a friendly place to admit to not knowing but hoping and having positive expectations based on PBO's track record.

Looking at past behavior as a predictor of future behavior. Gee, what a concept.

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
99. According to you
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:35 PM
Sep 2013

then, both President Obama & Senator Kerry deserve an Oscar for best actors. Personally I do not believe in fairy tales, such as "7 dimensional chess". I also do not believe either Obama nor Kerry were bluffing. In fact I believe they were/are deadly serious about lobbing cruise missiles at 50 targets in Syria.

But here's where the glitch came in with this plan.....NATO (our allies, like Great Britain), the UN, Congress and a huge majority of American citizens were saying loud & clear ...HELL NO!

The deal is nobody thinks this is a good idea. To much could go wrong and a war in the Middle East involving everyone from Turkey - Israel & Iran, Egypt, ....then dragging Russia and China in would be a catastrophe on the scope we really can't fathom.

Russia is aware of that, China is aware of that, and so are a lot of other people. Russia doesn't want it, nor do a whole lot of other people including the citizens of Syria. Somehow this would just not be very good for a whole bunch of people's health.

Russian/Putin has provided an out. To be honest if it works, and I will be sincerely grateful if it does, I'll be down on my knees thanking the Goddess for missing this bullet.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
101. This thread is sad.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 08:36 PM
Sep 2013

I'll be the first to say a Syrian disarmament and a stand down by the US would be a wonderful outcome here, however it was arrived at.

But that hasn't happened. Right now it exists in the same place as jet boots and Sasquatch; ie, Imagination Land. I think some people are so desperate for a reason to cheer, they're getting well ahead of themselves. If it doesn't play out the way they hope, then cheering today is going to look pretty silly and gullible tomorrow.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
107. Well I don't know. Look at all the folks that have been cheering about the...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:00 PM
Sep 2013

... the numbers in regards to how many congresscritters were planning on voting no on the congressional resolution on Syria.

There had NOT even been a vote taken and tons of folks were cheering because that it looked like it wouldn't pass and that Obama would be a lame duck.

I didn't see anyone telling those folks that their threads were 'sad'.

Has there ever been a time when folks on one side of an issue or the have not cheered?

Anyway, just thought I'd throw that out there



 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
112. I don't think they were cheering because Obama would be a lame duck.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:22 PM
Sep 2013

They were cheering because they thought it might prevent an act of war.

BlueEye

(449 posts)
108. This could be the finest diplomatic achievement since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:00 PM
Sep 2013

Of course I won't count the chickens before they hatch, especially with the harsh rhetoric that continues to come from the Administration. However this makes sense and could very well be the play President Obama had up his sleeve the whole time.

How happy would I be to see both an averted war and a victory for the Prez! To quote the film Apollo 13:

"This could be the worst disaster NASA's ever experienced."

"With all due respect sir, I believe this is gonna be our finest hour."

Just replace "NASA" with "The Obama Administration" and there you have it.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
110. It is not at all obvious that we didn't arrive at this point by accident.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:16 PM
Sep 2013

I give credit to this extent; they have the wits to recognize that there's no reason to continue careening around the block when you realize you're in the parking lot of the hotel which you were hoping to reach.

rpannier

(24,328 posts)
111. I'm hoping this works out for the best
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:18 PM
Sep 2013

But your analysis is incredibly weak and lacks one fact to support it.
The whole thing seems to be playing out where the Russians are seizing the upper hand by challenging the US, the EU and the Arab League by saying it's a possibility.
But, I'm sure if I look hard enough I'll find your post praising Dumbya for getting Libya to get rid of their chemical weapons. Because that was the spin from Republicans and the right when that happened

rury

(1,021 posts)
117. "Russia seizing the upper hand..." WTF rpannier??
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:42 PM
Sep 2013

You just refuse to give President Obama credit for anything....you are laughable!!


Obama stared and Putin/Assad blinked, big time!!
Bravo, Mr. President!!

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
113. Played? You've got to be kidding.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:23 PM
Sep 2013

He happened to know that Putin would come out with a proposal giving Obama the political cover he needed to back down from what proved to be a politically untenable position.

Yes, Obama could always depend on his old friend Vladimir. Why just ask Snowden about that.

LostOne4Ever

(9,286 posts)
116. I support anything
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:41 PM
Sep 2013

That results in a peaceful resolution to this situation.

If this was Obama and Kerry's plan all along then I give the administration nothing but kudos. Well played as always President Obama, great job!

This is what happens when we have a SMART president

citizen blues

(570 posts)
118. People often underestimate the President
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:42 PM
Sep 2013

One thing that I have noticed is that he's not a short-timer. He plays a long game. And he holds his cards very, very close to his chest. So I was wondering what was going to happen here.

Pretty brilliant to ask congress for approval. It immediately shut down all the right wing clap-trap about the President acting unilaterally and violating the constitution. It also bought him the time to work on finding another solution, since he was also probably counting on them doing exactly nothing, which they did by going on another fucking vacation.

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
121. Not so fast.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:44 PM
Sep 2013

As far as I know, Syria did not sign the anti-chemical weapons treaty, thus, they are not subject to the inspection regime associated with that treaty.

For this reason, we now must set up an inspection process . . . and you can bet neither the Russians nor the Syrians will agree to anything we propose.

This show is nowhere near over and we shouldn't break out the champagne just yet.

TroglodyteScholar

(5,477 posts)
123. Wow, so Syria agreed to turn over the chems?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:46 PM
Sep 2013

I'd hate to think anyone might be doing their victory dance prematurely....

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
125. If that had been Obama's objective, it would have made far more sense to achieve
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 09:47 PM
Sep 2013

it by bribing the Russians to pressure Syria. Setting up a situation where Parliament tells the Prime Minister to get stuffed and Obama's on the verge of losing a vote in the House to authorize military force doesn't make him look like master of diplomacy; it makes him look like a lucky bumbler.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
129. No, his objective is to hand Syria over to al Qaeda.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 10:03 PM
Sep 2013

If he was worried about chemical weapons, he would be trying to prevent rebels from using them.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
151. What could have happened for which you would NOT say "well done"?
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 11:12 PM
Sep 2013

Absolutely nothing. The bar just moves as needed to make sure he clears it every time.

The people of the U.S. rejected his arguments for bombing the crap out of Syria. And that's a good thing.

Javaman

(62,500 posts)
176. Until it actually happens I wouldn't be breaking out the champaign just yet.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 09:07 AM
Sep 2013

so far it's just been notes back and forth.

nothing formal has been announce, nothing signed and certainly no chems destroyed.

color my cautious.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
182. K&R for the folks that have actually become INCONTINENT at the mere thought of giving
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 11:50 AM
Sep 2013

this president ANY kudos, any recognition or any praise. I was in favor of Syrian intervention if necessary, but this is a far better solution if we can get it.

And some of them are all in this thread giving Putin, Merlin, Bo Jackson, even John Kerry's dog this victory -- ANYONE but the Democrats leading this administration. But yeah, this is just disappointment and "concern." Yeah. Okay

totodeinhere

(13,056 posts)
185. Lets wait to see how this plays out before giving out either credit or blame.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:10 PM
Sep 2013

So far all we have is words. If the Syrians actually do give up their chemical weapons I will be the first to cheer. But if this is merely a stalling tactic as Hillary Clinton has suggested then we could be right back where we started. The Syrian government has "agreed" on several occasions to enter peace talks with the rebels but it hasn't ever actually happened. How do we know that they will give up their chemical weapons given their track record? But I do agree that Obama and Kerry are right to agree to the Russian proposal and I hope it works out.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
186. What you so tellingly call the "Russian proposal" is referred to as Obama/Putin negotiations
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:16 PM
Sep 2013

in other circles. But I'm sure that's just a typo on your part.

Edit: But it's occurred to me that you may be calling it the Russian proposal because of their offer to take Syria's chemical weapons so never mind.

totodeinhere

(13,056 posts)
187. No, I was using the language used by most news outlets.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:25 PM
Sep 2013
Syria accepts Russian proposal on weapons; France to bring resolution to Security Council

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/france-to-author-security-council-resolution-to-require-syria-to-give-up-chemical-weapons/2013/09/10/0d51a06c-19ff-11e3-a628-7e6dde8f889d_story.html

Syria crisis: Obama welcomes Russia's chemical weapons proposal

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/09/us-russian-proposal-syria-chemical-weapons

Obama on Russia’s Syria chemical weapons proposal: 'Take it with a grain of salt'

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/09/20399319-obama-on-russias-syria-chemical-weapons-proposal-take-it-with-a-grain-of-salt?lite

Obama says Russian Syria proposal could be a breakthrough

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/09/09/russia-syria/2785703/

Syria Welcomes Russian Proposal To Put Chemical Weapons

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/09/syria-russia-proposal-chemical-weapons_n_3894302.html

Edit - Thanks for the correction. This just goes to show that people should not be so quick to jump to negative conclusions about what others say. Myself, unless I have evidence to the contrary I always try to give other people's comments the benefit of the doubt.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
183. Nonsense. Do you have any idea how easy it is to restart the chem program?
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:04 PM
Sep 2013

All they have to do is lay low for a couple of months and wait for the next Miley Cyrus story to hit and then they are free to start up the labs again.

But I do agree with you on one thing. He did accomplish his main objective, which was to get people to stop talking about the Security Industrial Complex.

 

BrainDrain

(244 posts)
184. Are you SERIOUS???!!!!
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:08 PM
Sep 2013

Dude,

Whatever you are smokin....I want some.

How in the name of tiny green apples do you in ANY way see this as a victory? He was going to bomb Syria until his own congress and the rest of the dam world let him know how BAD an idea it was. Then it was an off-hand remark by a Secretary of State whom I thought I knew, that got picked up on by the Russians' of all people, and suddenly everyone was able to save face. Obama LEAST of all, but still a fig leaf is better than no leaf.

Well. Fucking. Done. MY ASS! Our president looks like an idiot, our SOS looks like an idiot, and Putin is the ONLY one who looks like he actually knows how the game is played.

Stop trying to make this sound like Obama is some kind of freakin Jedi when he isn't.

orenbus

(44 posts)
188. A U.S. official called Secretary of State John Kerry's remarks in Britain on Monday a "major goof,"
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:29 PM
Sep 2013

(CNN) -- A U.S. official called Secretary of State John Kerry's remarks in Britain on Monday a "major goof," saying Kerry "clearly went off script here." The official was referring to Kerry's assertion that President Bashar al-Assad "could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons" to avoid potential U.S. military action. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has since proposed that Syria turn over its chemical weapons to the control of the international community, a proposal that Syria's foreign minister says he welcomes. "There is no one in the administration who is taking this Syria proposal seriously," the official said.

http://www.kvia.com/news/elections/URGENT-Syria-Kerry-Goof/-/390782/21849848/-/2vv941/-/index.html

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
198. It would be very good fortune to have a "major goof" actually lead to a positive outcome, though.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 04:00 PM
Sep 2013

Throughout these discussions of intervention in Syria there was consensus among the pro-war faction that diplomacy could not work because Russia would veto any UN resolution. I find it interesting that, assuming it happens, a diplomatic solution initiated by Russia worked in the end.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
189. One stated objective, anyway.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 12:47 PM
Sep 2013

That Assad expressed a willingness to cooperate, and did it so quickly, certainly makes the president and Kerry look successful.

For a little while longer, at least, we won't be responsible for the explosions in that land.

Tumbulu

(6,268 posts)
193. Biggest deal thous is that he SET THE PRECEDENT for going to Congress
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:02 PM
Sep 2013

BEFORE acting militarily. This is the very biggest triumph imo.

Well done!!!!!

lark

(23,061 posts)
199. Obama got very lucky.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 04:30 PM
Sep 2013

Wonder if he appreciates it? Bet AIPAC and MIC are mad, so wonder what their retribution will be? Obama didn't stick to the script.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
206. My last boss was like the puke congress critters
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 12:36 PM
Sep 2013

the haters and racist assholes. After we figured that out we'd make sure to suggest the most asinine way to get a job done then we'd know it wouldn't be done that way. We'd win by not having to go at the job like a fool and the boss would win by getting the job done the most efficient way which put money in his pocket, all in spite of his own shortcomings and prejudices. He never figured it out same as I doubt the pukes in congress will either. Not to mention the haters and racist assholes who live amongst us

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So it looks like Obama's ...