Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:48 PM Sep 2013

Two weeks ago, the stated objective was to "punish Assad" for having used chemical weapons . . .

. . . and not merely to hinder his ability to use them again. So I think the claim that Obama has "achieved his objective" in this whole mess is rather dishonest.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two weeks ago, the stated objective was to "punish Assad" for having used chemical weapons . . . (Original Post) markpkessinger Sep 2013 OP
do you mean to say that the stated objective was to punish him? cali Sep 2013 #1
That is certainloy how it was characterized markpkessinger Sep 2013 #2
your op title says "was NOT to punish...." cali Sep 2013 #15
Ooops! Corrected - Thank You! n/t markpkessinger Sep 2013 #18
you're welcome, mark. cali Sep 2013 #22
I heard everyone on DU agree Obama's goal was to strike so he'd look tough. JoePhilly Sep 2013 #3
This outcome is an embarrasment, but its the least embarrasing option NoOneMan Sep 2013 #8
Were you one of the folks predicting a 2nd Iraq war? JoePhilly Sep 2013 #14
All evidence pointed to a Syrian war in the last two weeks NoOneMan Sep 2013 #19
Well now you are just making shit up to go with your rollies. morningfog Sep 2013 #21
And send a message to Iran and other Hitler-esqe dictators NoOneMan Sep 2013 #4
Is it that important to win a talking point? last1standing Sep 2013 #5
I'll give him credit . . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #7
I'm not sure "smart enough" is saying much NoOneMan Sep 2013 #12
*Might* This thing is far from over. And the problem isn't Obama the man n/t Catherina Sep 2013 #9
isn't it more like an International and Diplomatic Victory though? And I'm considered by many DU'ers KittyWampus Sep 2013 #11
How do you know Obama's true objective? Avalux Sep 2013 #6
Perhaps I don't. . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #10
I too often rationalize a wild guess on the fact the others make wild guesses too LanternWaste Sep 2013 #23
You sound disappointed. Kber Sep 2013 #13
On the contrary, I am relieved that a solution short of the missile strikes Obama was so eager for.. markpkessinger Sep 2013 #16
Obama was supposed to prove he was a secret member of PNAC JoePhilly Sep 2013 #17
You do the best you can with what you've got, and when you know better, you do better LaydeeBug Sep 2013 #20

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
3. I heard everyone on DU agree Obama's goal was to strike so he'd look tough.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:52 PM
Sep 2013

It was VANITY. There was no other purpose.

Now its fun watching folks try to figure out how this outcome is in actuality, a bad thing.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
8. This outcome is an embarrasment, but its the least embarrasing option
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:55 PM
Sep 2013

All in all, it beats everything else hands down (so its "good&quot . That doesn't mean the US government doesn't have egg on its face.

I don't think people are trying to say this is a "bad thing". Rather, people are trying to be realistic in light of the 9th dimensional chess propaganda. You can only spin so far before all credibility is lost

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
14. Were you one of the folks predicting a 2nd Iraq war?
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:57 PM
Sep 2013

There have been so many, I've lost count.

Obama's threat of strikes forced Russia and Syria to the table.

Or wait ... Putin made this deal because he's a swell guy ... yea, that must be it.



 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
19. All evidence pointed to a Syrian war in the last two weeks
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:54 PM
Sep 2013

And maybe a world war (or at least a large proxy war). Maybe Russia's threats forced Obama back to the table. Who knows. Im not trying to spin anything. Im glad people aren't going to get bombed at the end of the day.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
21. Well now you are just making shit up to go with your rollies.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:59 PM
Sep 2013

Everyone did not agree that there was no other purpose.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
4. And send a message to Iran and other Hitler-esqe dictators
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:52 PM
Sep 2013

The new message is: "You can gas your people just once and get off free. Just don't do it again. Or. We will, um, well....."

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
5. Is it that important to win a talking point?
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:53 PM
Sep 2013

We might avert escalating violence in the Middle-East because of this change. Would you rather we send the bombs over because Obama wants to save face?

Give the man his victory lap and be happy for a peaceful solution.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
7. I'll give him credit . . .
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:54 PM
Sep 2013

. . . for being smart enough to know he had better take a way out of the mess he created for himself when it came his way.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
12. I'm not sure "smart enough" is saying much
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:56 PM
Sep 2013

A 5 year old could see this was the best of bad options. Though, Bush probably couldn't

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
11. isn't it more like an International and Diplomatic Victory though? And I'm considered by many DU'ers
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:56 PM
Sep 2013

to be a BOG'er even though I am not.

It seems like the real victory is for Diplomacy

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
6. How do you know Obama's true objective?
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:54 PM
Sep 2013

Yes we know the stated objective, the one made public. But as I've said time and time again, a lot goes on that is not made public. World politics is messy and complex when dealing with enemies; getting them to do what you want requires a bit more finesse than just telling them outright. None of us have any way of knowing if the outcome which appears to be on track, wasn't Obama's true objective all along.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
10. Perhaps I don't. . .
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:55 PM
Sep 2013

. . . but that cuts two ways. Neither do those who say he has 'accomplished his objective.'

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
23. I too often rationalize a wild guess on the fact the others make wild guesses too
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 04:04 PM
Sep 2013

I too often rationalize a wild guess on the fact the others make wild guesses too, well... I did when I was much younger. But after a while, we take things as either a valid or an invalid method, regardless of who else may or may not be doing the same.

Kber

(5,043 posts)
13. You sound disappointed.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:56 PM
Sep 2013

Are you upset that it is turning out this way?

Personally, I'm fine with a diplomatic solution and don't care who gets credit / blame.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
16. On the contrary, I am relieved that a solution short of the missile strikes Obama was so eager for..
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:59 PM
Sep 2013

... has been found.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
17. Obama was supposed to prove he was a secret member of PNAC
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:59 PM
Sep 2013

by invading Syria and creating a 2nd Iraq like war.

Since that's not going to happen, the outrage machine is starting to sputter.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
20. You do the best you can with what you've got, and when you know better, you do better
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:56 PM
Sep 2013

so now he knows, and he did better.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two weeks ago, the stated...