Question: Rand Paul

[gopiscrap]

I just heard on MSNBC that Rand Paul is not officially speaking for the Republican Party when he gives the response to the President's speech, then why in the fuck are the networks going to carry it?

[Motown_Johnny]

1. Why do people slow down to gawk at auto accidents? n/t

[Mr.Bill]

4. Exactly.

Just building more video to be used against him if he ever runs for President. Although the video of the Rachel Maddow interview where he says he would have voted against the civil rights act should just about do it.

[Berlum]

2. They need a TeaWanker (R) to degrade the discussion

and stir up a shitpot of stink. It's bad for America, but good for ratings (R - MoneyBucks).

[gopiscrap]

3. yup, that's kind of where I thought it was heading also.

Last edited Tue Sep 10, 2013, 06:52 PM - Edit history (1)

[Pretzel_Warrior]

7. believe it or not, more than anything...the thing that rankles with him

for me, anyway, is just how fucking rude he is to Obama or his appointees when he's questioning them? Just completely acts the 100% ass hole as though there is no room for decorum in the Senate.

[NYC_SKP]

5. Answer: Douchenozzle. nt

[Nye Bevan]

6. The bigger question is, why does the Republican Party

not want to make an official response? Don't they have any views on this important issue? Or are they pretty much only interested in repealing Obamacare?

[Lint Head]

8. Ed Shultz said it was only on Youtube Ran Paul channel.

[gopiscrap]

9. I had heard earlier that some of the networks were going to carry it.