Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:13 PM Sep 2013

Pastor Refuses to Marry Couple an Hour Before Ceremony Because Bride’s Dress is Too Sexy

Apostle Michael Canty of the Truth Ministries Holiness Church recently refused to marry a couple mere hours before the ceremony was to be performed. His reasoning? The bride’s dress was too sexy:

[center][/center]

The wedding scheduled Saturday, August 10th, was scheduled for 3pm. At 2pm, the pastor greeted the bride and groom when he noticed the bride’s dress. According to the bride’s mother, the pastor jokingly asked ‘where is the other half of the dress?’ Not thinking anything of it, the family laughed it off and continued applying make-up on the bride. Around 2:30pm the pastor asked a leader of the church to ask the bride and the family about the other part of her dress. The bride informed the leader ‘this is it’. The leader reported the news to the pastor and then the pastor informed personally the bride and groom at separate times he could not perform the wedding with the bride in her selected dress. The pastor told the bride she would have to cover up her breast area and find a way to add length to the dress. The bride informed the pastor there is no way to accomplish this with so short of a notice and she has to wear her dress. Then the pastor informed her he would not be able to perform the ceremony then walked back to his office.

It is no secret that religions tend to preach “modesty” to women, but this is downright ridiculous. Wedding days are supposed to be a celebration of a couple, not an opportunity to be slut-shamed by a pastor.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/09/10/pastor-refuses-to-marry-couple-an-hour-before-ceremony-because-brides-dress-is-too-sexy/
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pastor Refuses to Marry Couple an Hour Before Ceremony Because Bride’s Dress is Too Sexy (Original Post) SecularMotion Sep 2013 OP
He should have to pay for all the other services that they had already paid for such as catering liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #1
Absolutely. Small claims case waiting to happen. n/t JimDandy Sep 2013 #36
I guess he was expecting something else get the red out Sep 2013 #2
One more reason to go to the court house and get married! B Calm Sep 2013 #3
The couple chose the church, kiva Sep 2013 #4
Have you ever seen My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding? They seem to find pastors willing to marry them. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #5
Haven't seen it, kiva Sep 2013 #7
Looks interesting Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #16
Wondered that myself. Xithras Sep 2013 #48
When you got it, flaunt it, and when you are really gorgeous and got it, really flaunt it indepat Sep 2013 #6
In a church? WinkyDink Sep 2013 #58
Where ever appropriate: surely the good Lord would have no problem with this gorgeous creature he indepat Sep 2013 #60
Marriage is a religious ceremony, after all BlueStreak Sep 2013 #8
I agree. blueamy66 Sep 2013 #23
nope, not according to Mae West. ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2013 #42
I don't think I'd look to Mae West as the arbiter of etiquette. BlueStreak Sep 2013 #45
ITA. Churches are more like social clubs. Ilsa Sep 2013 #53
Marriage is only a religious ceremony when someone makes it a religious ceremony Auggie Sep 2013 #52
Yes, I guess I should have said "church marriage". We have a terminology problem BlueStreak Sep 2013 #56
The family obviously did not understand this church's teachings. They get no sympathy from me. Hekate Sep 2013 #9
double sided tape works wonders. As do bandaids to keep the nipples from ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2013 #19
LOLZ Hekate Sep 2013 #37
Good God! Lucky guy...! Katashi_itto Sep 2013 #10
Thats not the bride. Its a model. bunnies Sep 2013 #15
Maybe be more selective in who you hire? 1awake Sep 2013 #11
the only thing that would make the dress less tasteful would be if it were made of pleather. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #12
Agreed. bunnies Sep 2013 #18
Or if the bride vankuria Sep 2013 #27
Sounds to me like this woman was trying to bend the church to her will. last1standing Sep 2013 #13
His church, his rules! hedgehog Sep 2013 #14
I wouldn't exactly call this a slut-shaming. denverbill Sep 2013 #17
I wonder why they didnt use a photo of the REAL bride. bunnies Sep 2013 #20
just because PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #21
Note: This is not the actual bride Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #22
I wonder why she refused to send photos of herself. bunnies Sep 2013 #25
The photo they submitted may have been the tasteful version (nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #28
My guess is that if you saw the real bride in that dress, it would be a sin BlueStreak Sep 2013 #46
Funny, because that pic almost makes me want to get married. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #24
The Pastor was a douche, but he was within his rights . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #26
These people were probably not church-goers... Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #30
That may not stop him from being sued Major Nikon Sep 2013 #62
That is kind of crappy. HappyMe Sep 2013 #29
Religion and a need to coerce other people into conformity go hand in hand. Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #31
Ya can't blame the good reverend. She was obviously asking for it. LadyHawkAZ Sep 2013 #32
I agree with those that say Jenoch Sep 2013 #33
That is a big "if" BlueStreak Sep 2013 #47
There are plenty of wedding chapels around. NaturalHigh Sep 2013 #34
maybe they should have paid attention to churches doctrine La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2013 #35
They aren't members of the congregation FreeState Sep 2013 #49
The minister probably assumed that anyone asking to be wed inside a church would know better.... Hekate Sep 2013 #50
Maybe another several hundred in the collection plate would have done the trick... FarCenter Sep 2013 #38
Was the Vera Wang bikini not available? LittleBlue Sep 2013 #39
That sinful woman probably knows how to read, too. Shocking! Orrex Sep 2013 #40
It was up to the pastor tammywammy Sep 2013 #41
If you want to be married in the Truth Ministries Holiness Church, you play by their rules. JVS Sep 2013 #43
Pretty dress...if you're going to a nightclub jmowreader Sep 2013 #44
With that dress....might I suggest Las Vegas with Elvis officiating! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #51
No sympathy from me. They had options-they chose not to take them. When you are a guest Rowdyboy Sep 2013 #54
South Florida Beach Weddings HockeyMom Sep 2013 #55
I watch "Say Yes to the Dress," and am continually amazed at the "stripper" designs chosen. WinkyDink Sep 2013 #57
idiots Niceguy1 Sep 2013 #59
It's a perfect dress SoCalDem Sep 2013 #61
Misogyny Lancero Sep 2013 #63
I was gonna say she looked pretty and was gonna hold the door for her The Straight Story Sep 2013 #65
I can almost see his point: a Pastor with an erection makes for an awkward ceremony... Alamuti Lotus Sep 2013 #64
My guess is that the real bride outweighed the model tavernier Sep 2013 #66

kiva

(4,373 posts)
4. The couple chose the church,
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:23 PM
Sep 2013

they chose the minister - when you choose to bring religion into a situation, then you are choosing to play by their rules. Stop worrying about having a cool backdrop for your wedding pics, or whether your families will be pissed off about your not getting a church blessing, and just go to the courthouse instead.

And the article is wrong - if you choose to marry in a church, I can promise you it's not about the couple it's about the church marrying the couple and making them promise to follow the church's strictures.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
48. Wondered that myself.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 06:29 PM
Sep 2013

They chose to marry in a conservative church and then complained when it stood by its conservative values? I'm no fan of conservative churches, but it seems to me that they dug this hole themselves.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
60. Where ever appropriate: surely the good Lord would have no problem with this gorgeous creature he
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 07:49 PM
Sep 2013

created flaunting her right stuff on maybe the happiest day of her life.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
8. Marriage is a religious ceremony, after all
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:31 PM
Sep 2013

I don't blame the pastor if he feels that a skanky dress is offensive to the church he represents. She can go to the courthouse and get married in a secular procedure.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
45. I don't think I'd look to Mae West as the arbiter of etiquette.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 05:13 PM
Sep 2013

While everybody has a right to their own beliefs, that doesn't change the fact that religions are private clubs. They are within their rights to uphold their own bylaws if there is no illegal discrimination. And there is not law that puts a skank in a ridiculous dress into a protected class.

Why would she even want to be involved with a church in the first place?

Was this Our Lady of Immaculate Hotties?

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
53. ITA. Churches are more like social clubs.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 07:15 PM
Sep 2013

You have to agree to accept concepts about religion and agree to follow its prescribed behavior, including modesty. She blew it.

This isn't "slut-shaming". She is perfectly able to wear that dress in a secular ceremony. It wasn't appropriate for a conservative church.

Women used to wear bolero jackets over their strapless wedding gowns. I guess that's passé.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
56. Yes, I guess I should have said "church marriage". We have a terminology problem
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 07:23 PM
Sep 2013

It would be a whole lot better if the legal process were called something else, and all rights and benefits related to government and laws were associated with that other term. Then "marriage" could simply be the church procedure that has no standing outside the church, like a bar mitzvvah. If a bar mitzvah is important to a family, have at it, but it has no legal standing outside the synagogue.

I was married by the mayor of a small nearby town, with the ceremony performed in a public park. I have no desire to impose that choice upon anybody else and will never understand why some church people insist that their's is the only acceptable solution.

Hekate

(90,645 posts)
9. The family obviously did not understand this church's teachings. They get no sympathy from me.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:32 PM
Sep 2013

You got this from a site called "friendly atheist"? Super. They don't get to tell an individual church what their standards are.

Inside a church, temple, synagogue, grove, or other holy precincts, weddings are not solely "a celebration of a couple" but a sacrament. Couples should go over what that means with the priest, rabbi, or minister. Those who don't get that can choose to be married elsewhere by someone who shares their own beliefs, whatever those may be. Nudist colonies do it and no one looks twice. Beaches, parks, all offer lovely venues where you can dress as you please.

That dress is great for Saturday night, if she can keep her boobs from falling out while reaching for her martini. Maybe that's what makes it so great.

It's not slut-shaming to say that it is not appropriate wear for church the next morning, or for teaching in a public school, or interviewing for a serious job opportunity, or any number of other things.



ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
19. double sided tape works wonders. As do bandaids to keep the nipples from
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:41 PM
Sep 2013

being called "outstanding"

Hey, working behind the scenes in theater teaches you a lot!

1awake

(1,494 posts)
11. Maybe be more selective in who you hire?
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:34 PM
Sep 2013

I've been married twice, and the second time, not belonging to any church (recent move), I found a pastor on the net in my area... there was no shortage of people willing to make a deal. I told him where to be and what the service would look like. He gave his ideas of wording and ceremonies to choose from. It was great, right on the beach.

I guess what I'm saying is know who your hiring.

vankuria

(904 posts)
27. Or if the bride
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:52 PM
Sep 2013

doesn't look like the model in the photo. The dress is very sexy and a look that would be hard to pull off unless you have a perfectly toned body like the model in the photo.

I'm speculating this bride did not and choosing a dress that's inappropriate for church was only made worse by a bride with extremely poor taste and judgement.

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
13. Sounds to me like this woman was trying to bend the church to her will.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:36 PM
Sep 2013

As another poster commented, these people chose to get married in the church, the church did not ask them to get married there. Just as I wouldn't go into a Wendy's and demand KFC, I wouldn't hire a church to perform a service where I stood in front of the altar wearing revealing clothing. Whether I agree with the rules or not, it's their house so they make the rules. Either abide by them or leave.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
14. His church, his rules!
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:36 PM
Sep 2013

Too many show up for a church wedding not out of any religious belief, but because it makes a great background for the photos and/or to keep the parents happy!

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
17. I wouldn't exactly call this a slut-shaming.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:37 PM
Sep 2013

That dress is way over the top for a church wedding, IMO. Frankly, the only places that dress would not be out of place is at a music awards show and a strip club. You sure as hell couldn't wear that to work anyplace I can think of, and if you couldn't wear it to work, why expect a minister to allow it in his church.

Personally, I think this was a stunt by the girl to get publicity, like the high school girl with the revealing yearbook picture who made a stink for being excluded from her yearbook.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
20. I wonder why they didnt use a photo of the REAL bride.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:41 PM
Sep 2013

We should see what the pastor saw, shouldnt we?

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
22. Note: This is not the actual bride
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:43 PM
Sep 2013

This is a photograph from the catalog where the dress was sold. Also note that neither the bride or the groom were members of this church, which was established just 14 months ago. If there was some sort of "dress code" for this church, the pastor really should have let them know it advance.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
25. I wonder why she refused to send photos of herself.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:49 PM
Sep 2013

Maybe its even skankier than pictured?


‘there were small alterations made to the dress to fit more desirably to my vision.’


http://www.americapreachers.com/christian-news/pastor-refuses-to-perform-ceremony-because-of-brides-sexy-dress/

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
26. The Pastor was a douche, but he was within his rights . .
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:51 PM
Sep 2013

. . . No clergy person is ever required to perform any wedding whatsoever, and is thus free to impose whatever conditions he or she (or the particular church) sees fit. And what's more, you really shouldn't want them to be required to perform weddings, because that would enable them to argue that, for example, marriage equality represents "religious oppression," since the state could then theoretically require churches to perform gay weddings. Of course, the state cannot do that, and nor can it require clergy to perform weddings, nor prevent particular churches from imposing whatever requirements they deem appropriate on any weddings they choose to perform.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
30. These people were probably not church-goers...
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:55 PM
Sep 2013

He had the chance to use it as a "teachable moment" and possible win converts to his new ministry. He chose instead to stick to his rules, which was his right, and lose the moment.

Bear in mind, however, that if he accepted money for the use of the church and then refused the wedding (without informing the couple that there was a dress code) they might have grounds to sue him for the financial losses they suffered.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
62. That may not stop him from being sued
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 08:05 PM
Sep 2013

As long as the couple complied with whatever agreements were in place the church could get sued for breach of contract and rightfully so. They are free to impose whatever lawful restrictions they want, but not to arbitrarily change them mid-stream.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
29. That is kind of crappy.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:53 PM
Sep 2013

On the other hand, if her family attended this church or any church, they could have clued her in that her dress would not be appropriate for a church service.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
31. Religion and a need to coerce other people into conformity go hand in hand.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:57 PM
Sep 2013

No sympathy for all the whining. You pays your money and you takes your chances.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
32. Ya can't blame the good reverend. She was obviously asking for it.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 02:02 PM
Sep 2013

Just look at the way she was dressed!

( for the impaired)

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
33. I agree with those that say
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 02:14 PM
Sep 2013

that particular dress is not appropriate for a church wedding. I don't personally think it is a dress for any sort of wedding. If the woman wearing such a dress can pull it off as well as the model does, it's a great dress to go clubbing.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
34. There are plenty of wedding chapels around.
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 02:16 PM
Sep 2013

It's up to the church and the pastor to decide what guidelines must be followed for the ceremony inside this particular church. I would hardly call that "slut-shaming."

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
35. maybe they should have paid attention to churches doctrine
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 02:17 PM
Sep 2013

the pastor had the right to do this, if this is what they preached.


FreeState

(10,570 posts)
49. They aren't members of the congregation
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 06:46 PM
Sep 2013

They hired him to preform the service at the Church. He should have told them that there were dress standards etc., since it was he that was offering a public service.

Hekate

(90,645 posts)
50. The minister probably assumed that anyone asking to be wed inside a church would know better....
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 07:01 PM
Sep 2013

... and not be such a blockhead.

He's probably writing up something as we speak:

Congratulations on your upcoming marriage! Here's a few things you should take into consideration when considering a wedding in our sanctuary...

35 years ago I was a part time secretary for the local Unity Church, which did a thriving business in its wedding chapel, as Santa Barbara is conveniently located on the 101 freeway between Los Angeles and San Luis Obispo, on the way to San Francisco. I don't think they left anything to chance when people scheduled weddings there, although honestly....

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
39. Was the Vera Wang bikini not available?
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 03:01 PM
Sep 2013

Obviously the pastor can refuse marriage for whatever reason, and this reason isn't mysterious or unexpected. No one should have to tell the bride that her outfit might be deemed inappropriate by a pastor.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
41. It was up to the pastor
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 03:58 PM
Sep 2013

I went and read the original article and this popped out at me:

After hearing how the bride was crying her eyes out in the back, a minister who was a guest at the wedding offered to perform the ceremony. When the minister asked the pastor for permission to perform the ceremony, the pastor told him ‘no’ and expressed to him how his request was disrespectful.
http://www.americapreachers.com/christian-news/pastor-refuses-to-perform-ceremony-because-of-brides-sexy-dress/?fb_action_ids=573383712720119&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%7B%22573383712720119%22%3A193953987442123%7D&action_type_map=%7B%22573383712720119%22%3A%22og.likes%22%7D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D


So the article says they had food at her aunt's house for a reception. There was a minister as a guest. Why not just perform the ceremony at the aunt's house? It says two days later they still aren't married. That just doesn't make sense - there was a backup minister as a guest.

Strange story, but if you're going to wear a "sexy" and "unique" wedding dress, you might wanna run it past the church where you're marrying at.

jmowreader

(50,554 posts)
44. Pretty dress...if you're going to a nightclub
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 04:18 PM
Sep 2013

I wonder why "someone run down to David's Bridal quick and get me a white floor-length gown, my measurements are x-x-x and height is y" never occurred to these people."

I also wonder why they chose a Christian Taliban church then got surprised when the preacher went all Mullah Omar on them.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
54. No sympathy from me. They had options-they chose not to take them. When you are a guest
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 07:18 PM
Sep 2013

you behave appropriately or you leave, same as here on DU.

The dress was fine for a secular wedding but not for a church wedding, especially that of a fundamentalist church. If my partner and I were ever to marry, I wouldn't choose a Holiness, Catholic, southern Baptist or Pentecostal church because I have enough sense to know we would be unwelcome. I'd pick an Episcopal, UU, MCC or another welcoming congregation. More likely I'd select an outdoor setting with a secular officiant

http://www.inquisitr.com/929238/houston-pastor-refuses-to-marry-couple-because-brides-dress-was-too-sexy/

"Neither Lisa Washington nor her fiancé were members of the church. Holiness churches generally have a very strict dress code and forbid the use of make-up and nail polish, jewelry, and the like. Skirts and dresses have to fall below the knees and shirts typically have to be long-sleeved. Many Holiness churches identify themselves as Pentecostal, which has its roots in the holiness movement of the late 1800s and early 1900s."

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
59. idiots
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 07:47 PM
Sep 2013

They should have known better. And at leadt have asked at the practice. ...usually the dress codes are no secret...

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
63. Misogyny
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 08:17 PM
Sep 2013

is out in full force today.


You know what is wrong with this dress? Nothing. It's a dress. It's not about making a statement, or about the kind of person she is. It's her wearing a dress that she thinks looks good on what she hopes will be one of the best days in her life.

The dress doesn't send a message - It's the misogynists and perverts who are saying that it does, and it is they who are making up the message.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
65. I was gonna say she looked pretty and was gonna hold the door for her
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 08:24 PM
Sep 2013

but then remembered where I was and that both were sins.

tavernier

(12,377 posts)
66. My guess is that the real bride outweighed the model
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 09:14 PM
Sep 2013

and was attempting to put a ten pound sausage into a five pound bag (as goes the old saying).

I don't know why I think this, but that's the only vision that enters my mind. Sort of a "Honey Boo Boo family wedding".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pastor Refuses to Marry C...