Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYes, Amsterdam Really Did Banish an Entire Family to a Shipping Container 'Scum Village'
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/politics/2013/09/can-amsterdam-really-banish-entire-families-shipping-container-scum-village/6824/Yikes.
Following a long period of trouble with the police and neighbors, the city recently evicted the Dimitrov family from Amsterdams Noord district and sent them to basic accommodation on Zeeburger Island, a predominantly ex-industrial port zone in the area where the city meets the Ijmeer Lake. Housed in converted shipping containers monitored by a heavy police presence, the idea behind the move is that the family will bother their neighbors less if they dont have any neighbors to bother.
The plan is part of a controversial, long-threatened scheme to create far-flung, socially isolated communities for the "antisocial," approvingly dubbed "scum villages" by rightist politician Geert Wilders, who suggested the best way to deal with disruptive citizens would be for the authorities to "put all the trash together." Intended to shield the law-abiding from public nuisance, the scheme intends to place the troublesome in a form of social quarantine until theyre dubbed to be sufficiently domesticated to return to their previous homes. Following the current trend for reusing shipping containers, these short-term digs are in effect an open form of pop-up prison. Its a policy that has some previous form in the Netherlands, where in the 19th century officially designated problem families were resettled in what were then considered distant, sandy wastes near the German border.
Despite the ugly name the current policy has picked up, its rather less draconian than its 19th century predecessor. Zeeburger Island may be somewhat bleak, but with one of its corners benefiting from a tram connection that reaches central Amsterdam within 20 minutes, its hardly Devils Island either. The Dimitrov familys crimes (denied by the family) haven't been listed explicitly in press coverage, but its perfectly conceivable that that their former neighbors are sighing with relief after finally being rid of daily disruption.
The plan has obvious flaws nonetheless. Families deemed "antisocial" almost invariably have a host of other problems, be it unemployment, incomplete education, social isolation, mental illness, or language difficulties. Even if families are difficult to live with the Dimitrovs son-in-law has argued that the family are being harassed only because they are Roma tidying them away into distant metal boxes seems unlikely to make their behavior a thing of the past, provide them with a less antisocial way of living their lives, or create healthy neighborhoods in the places to which they are banished. More insidiously still, the plan has a divide and rule undertow, its naming, shaming and banishing implicitly suggesting that social problems in poorer areas are not connected to deprivation but will simply evaporate if a few bad apples are sifted out, publicly ostracized and sent away. The Netherlands is very likely to experience more high-profile transfers of families to similar container housing over the next year. The possibility of these moves promoting a sudden outburst of neighborliness and social order, however, seems rather unlikely.
The plan is part of a controversial, long-threatened scheme to create far-flung, socially isolated communities for the "antisocial," approvingly dubbed "scum villages" by rightist politician Geert Wilders, who suggested the best way to deal with disruptive citizens would be for the authorities to "put all the trash together." Intended to shield the law-abiding from public nuisance, the scheme intends to place the troublesome in a form of social quarantine until theyre dubbed to be sufficiently domesticated to return to their previous homes. Following the current trend for reusing shipping containers, these short-term digs are in effect an open form of pop-up prison. Its a policy that has some previous form in the Netherlands, where in the 19th century officially designated problem families were resettled in what were then considered distant, sandy wastes near the German border.
Despite the ugly name the current policy has picked up, its rather less draconian than its 19th century predecessor. Zeeburger Island may be somewhat bleak, but with one of its corners benefiting from a tram connection that reaches central Amsterdam within 20 minutes, its hardly Devils Island either. The Dimitrov familys crimes (denied by the family) haven't been listed explicitly in press coverage, but its perfectly conceivable that that their former neighbors are sighing with relief after finally being rid of daily disruption.
The plan has obvious flaws nonetheless. Families deemed "antisocial" almost invariably have a host of other problems, be it unemployment, incomplete education, social isolation, mental illness, or language difficulties. Even if families are difficult to live with the Dimitrovs son-in-law has argued that the family are being harassed only because they are Roma tidying them away into distant metal boxes seems unlikely to make their behavior a thing of the past, provide them with a less antisocial way of living their lives, or create healthy neighborhoods in the places to which they are banished. More insidiously still, the plan has a divide and rule undertow, its naming, shaming and banishing implicitly suggesting that social problems in poorer areas are not connected to deprivation but will simply evaporate if a few bad apples are sifted out, publicly ostracized and sent away. The Netherlands is very likely to experience more high-profile transfers of families to similar container housing over the next year. The possibility of these moves promoting a sudden outburst of neighborliness and social order, however, seems rather unlikely.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1135 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, Amsterdam Really Did Banish an Entire Family to a Shipping Container 'Scum Village' (Original Post)
Recursion
Sep 2013
OP
msongs
(67,193 posts)1. in the usa we do that, but they are called jails nt
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)2. Pics of the actual place---
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)3. We kinda have the same thing here...but I better not say....
Recursion
(56,582 posts)4. Well, we call it Tacoma, WA
buh-dum ching.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)5. Hey!
That's not nice. I live there.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)6. See? It's working!
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)7. OMG