Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:44 AM Sep 2013

Health law's ailments can be cured by single-payer system

All the shortcomings of the healthcare restructuring result from the decision to leave it in the hands of private insurers

By Michael Hiltzik
Los Angeles Times, Sept. 10, 2013

With the Oct. 1 rollout of a major facet of the Affordable Care Act on the horizon, you'll be hearing a lot about the glitches, loopholes and shortcomings of this most important restructuring of America's healthcare system in our lifetimes. Here are a couple of things to keep in mind:

First, the vast majority of these issues result from one crucial compromise made in the drafting of the 2010 law, ostensibly to ease its passage through Congress. That was to leave the system in the hands of private health insurance companies.

Second, there's an obvious way to correct this flaw: The country should progress on to a single-payer system.

more

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2013/september/health-laws-ailments-can-be-cured-by-single-payer-system

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Health law's ailments can be cured by single-payer system (Original Post) n2doc Sep 2013 OP
K & R Wounded Bear Sep 2013 #1
Medicare for all. jsr Sep 2013 #2
I really hope PasadenaTrudy Sep 2013 #3
Single payer really should come from the state level IronLionZion Sep 2013 #4
The legislature wanted single-payer in California, but Gov. Jerry Brown rejected it. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #5
When was that? I thought Jerry Brown would be a supporter? IronLionZion Sep 2013 #6
The California senate passed it, but Brown would not sign it. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #7

PasadenaTrudy

(3,998 posts)
3. I really hope
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:52 AM
Sep 2013

I'll get to see single-payer in my lifetime, but I'm not holding my breath. I turn 50 in Jan. and plan to get ins on the Covered California exchange. Right now, I have a blue shield PPO and I pay $368 a month, with high deductibles. Under the new plans, I can get a Bronze plan that covers 60% for $262, on up to Platinum and 90% coverage and no major deductible. The high end is around $540 a month! I do use my ins due to health issues and I'm on a few meds, so I don't plan to go with lowest coverage. Not sure what I will do, the high end plans are so pricey. We shall see.

IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
4. Single payer really should come from the state level
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 11:27 AM
Sep 2013

like in Canada. Once it is shown to be successful somewhere like Vermont or California, other liberal states will follow suit. All of this hinges on having enough liberals in every stage of state government who will support it.


In the meantime, get everyone covered first. This excess demand for health providers should encourage growth on the health provider side: more general practice doctors, walk in clinics, cancer screenings, regular checkups, etc.

IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
6. When was that? I thought Jerry Brown would be a supporter?
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 11:49 AM
Sep 2013

I remember the legislature passing it twice and Schwarzeneggar vetoed it. After that they haven't gotten enough support in the legislature because the economy went south.

I definitely remember reading that Vermont passed it and Gov. Shumlin signed it into law. But full implementation is delayed a few years because of the ACA.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
7. The California senate passed it, but Brown would not sign it.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 11:52 AM
Sep 2013

I believe that occurred about March 2010.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health law's ailments can...