Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pa28

(6,145 posts)
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 01:46 PM Sep 2013

Study: "Trade" Deal Would Mean a Pay Cut for 90% of U.S. Workers

From Public Citizen

The verdict is in: most U.S. workers would see wage losses as a result of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a sweeping U.S. "free trade" deal under negotiation with 11 Pacific Rim countries. That's the conclusion of a report just released by the non-partisan Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).


Wage stagnation is no mystery. Raising the minimum wage is great but we need to start thinking in terms of treating the illness rather than applying band-aids to the battered remains of labor.

Pressure does work. Call your Senators and Congressman and tell them to vote "no" on fast track authorization for the TPP.
77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study: "Trade" Deal Would Mean a Pay Cut for 90% of U.S. Workers (Original Post) pa28 Sep 2013 OP
NAFTA, TPP - the Democratic party should be ashamed leftstreet Sep 2013 #1
They are proud of it! jtuck004 Sep 2013 #16
The President admitted that NAFTA has problems and needed to be renegotiated. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #50
It's not the Democrats. It's the DINO's. nt silvershadow Sep 2013 #37
The impetus for NAFTA actually began with Ronald Reagan B Calm Sep 2013 #51
'Obamacare' was also originally a Republican plan n/t leftstreet Sep 2013 #53
K&R. You are right. We did a good job conveying our feelings about Syria. We need to let our liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #2
According to some, we were just played about Syria. djean111 Sep 2013 #4
The TPP, at least, is not defensible. djean111 Sep 2013 #3
I've seen the spin in some of the more wonky corners of the internet. It's chess again. pa28 Sep 2013 #8
Yeah, I'm waiting for it too... it's part of Obama's strategy to get card check or something beerandjesus Sep 2013 #14
The US is the big problem with alsame Sep 2013 #5
People ask why they send jobs overseas. They say because our unions are too expensive and they can liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #7
Many Americans accept into this alsame Sep 2013 #12
They also don't understand that it wouldn't mean a huge jump in prices laundry_queen Sep 2013 #66
I completely agree. Plus, the quality alsame Sep 2013 #67
Not the ones who matter to our betters in Washington. nt Demo_Chris Sep 2013 #6
This Travesty Has To Start Getting Traction As A Huge Game Changing Issue colsohlibgal Sep 2013 #9
The president has called TPP his "top prioity" mick063 Sep 2013 #10
An evil deed, indeed. Populist_Prole Sep 2013 #42
Well, duh. Why do you think they're negotiating it in secret? Scuba Sep 2013 #11
I'm sure cutting wages, HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #13
Another stake being hammered through the hearts of the middle class. Hutzpa Sep 2013 #15
We can BEAT China. They work college grads for $22 a day. We can do it for $20!!! jtuck004 Sep 2013 #17
and who played a leading part in drafting the TPP? Hillary Clinton. antigop Sep 2013 #18
The President and the Party Leadership ALREADY know this. bvar22 Sep 2013 #19
It's so sad - and, frankly, absurd to keep voting for these guys. polichick Sep 2013 #34
Why is Obama stalling? Is he waiting for the Repubs to agree to cut SS with a chained CPI? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #20
I've been trying to tell you guys for years that they won't stop with the auto industry. Romulox Sep 2013 #21
Ye of little faith. Obama's got this. raouldukelives Sep 2013 #22
Third way philosophy in action. pa28 Sep 2013 #23
Except for it being known that the only people this isn't secret from are those operating TheKentuckian Sep 2013 #26
lololol - TBF Sep 2013 #31
You forgot this... progressoid Sep 2013 #48
The TPP is a disaster for combating climate change NickB79 Sep 2013 #65
Not a chance. Our President has said he is serious about climate change. raouldukelives Sep 2013 #70
Rep. Alan Grayson libdude Sep 2013 #24
k&r Starry Messenger Sep 2013 #25
K & R AzDar Sep 2013 #27
Do these stupid bastard corporate types ever wonder why they cant sell into the third world? DJ13 Sep 2013 #28
Huh? India and China are much more active markets than the US for most corporations Recursion Sep 2013 #47
Those countries have a rising middle class DJ13 Sep 2013 #59
Yes, but unless something changes, we will be cheap labor for their developing middle classes. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #63
Never forget whose administration is trying to screw American workers with this obscene agreement. MotherPetrie Sep 2013 #29
K&R n/t Joe Shlabotnik Sep 2013 #30
Should be mandatory reading. K&R nt TBF Sep 2013 #32
I'm fortunate to be in the ten percent that won't see a wage cut. TexasTowelie Sep 2013 #33
No wonder the bosses are so excited about it. *nt Alamuti Lotus Sep 2013 #35
Pay cuts for 90% of U.S. workers is good for 'Merika, for the bidness of 'Merika indepat Sep 2013 #36
I've called, signed petions Pharaoh Sep 2013 #38
All predictions about the horrendous effects of trade deals senseandsensibility Sep 2013 #39
Proud to be rec 99 for the 99% grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #40
K&R woo me with science Sep 2013 #41
I notice that none of the "Obama Group" have posted here. They are probably too busy rhett o rick Sep 2013 #43
Don't worry. pa28 Sep 2013 #44
What's fun is to ask them if they support the TPP, or fracking, or indefinite detention. They will rhett o rick Sep 2013 #45
they are more dangerous than the right-wing DJ13 Sep 2013 #60
You're talking about the BOGies aren't you? L0oniX Sep 2013 #73
I am talking about those that never discuss issues unless they pertain to the President. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #74
It's not as if not passing trade agreements stops jobs from going overseas Recursion Sep 2013 #46
So you support the TPP? nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #62
Reading comprehension fail Recursion Sep 2013 #68
If you said that you support the TPP anywhere in your thread, then I will admit I missed it. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #69
Amazing how the pr machine will never answer a direct question on policy!!! grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #76
I find it sadly amusing. They speak in some kind of code and when you try to guess what rhett o rick Feb 2014 #77
Fuck the TPP blackspade Sep 2013 #49
Trans-Pac = DC "bipartisanship" at work! blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #52
K & R historylovr Sep 2013 #54
Now there is a non-bias study,,,,,,, LMAO! nt Cryptoad Sep 2013 #55
Some of the TPP countries are already developed Progressive dog Sep 2013 #56
When I read "Third World America" by Arianna Huffington IDemo Sep 2013 #57
Oh I'm sure if that happened Obama would fix it later kenny blankenship Sep 2013 #58
kick woo me with science Sep 2013 #61
The fix is in. We are not a democracy; we are a de facto oligarchy, ruled by the Investor Class. WinkyDink Sep 2013 #64
China even pays postage for imports to the US Generic Other Sep 2013 #71
This deal is not Democratic in any way shape or form. No real Democrat would suggest this "deal". L0oniX Sep 2013 #72
kick woo me with science Feb 2014 #75
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
16. They are proud of it!
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 03:07 PM
Sep 2013

How does one know when they have crossed the front lines in the battle onto the other side when everyone is wearing the same uniform...?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
50. The President admitted that NAFTA has problems and needed to be renegotiated.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:40 AM
Sep 2013

The TPP will be far worse.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
51. The impetus for NAFTA actually began with Ronald Reagan
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:44 AM
Sep 2013

NAFTA was signed by President George H.W. Bush, Mexican President Salinas, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1992. It was ratified by the legislatures of the three countries in 1993. The U.S. House of Representatives approved it by 234 to 200 on November 17, 1993. The U.S. Senate approved it by 60 to 38 on November 20, three days later.

In the House a bipartisan coalition of 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats prevailed over the opposition of 156 Democrats, 43 Republicans and one independent.

In the Senate the vote was 61 YEAs and 38 NAYs and 1 not voting.

Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boren (D-OK), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Brown (R-CO), Yea
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Bumpers (D-AR), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Nay
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Campbell (D-CO), Nay
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Cohen (R-ME), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Coverdell (R-GA), Yea
Craig (R-ID), Nay
D'Amato (R-NY), Nay
Danforth (R-MO), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
DeConcini (D-AZ), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dole (R-KS), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Not Voting
Durenberger (R-MN), Yea
Exon (D-NE), Nay
Faircloth (R-NC), Nay
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Ford (D-KY), Nay
Glenn (D-OH), Nay
Gorton (R-WA), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Hatfield (R-OR), Yea
Heflin (D-AL), Nay
Helms (R-NC), Nay
Hollings (D-SC), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Jeffords (R-VT), Yea
Johnston (D-LA), Yea
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Nay
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Yea
Mathews (D-TN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Metzenbaum (D-OH), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Mitchell (D-ME), Yea
Moseley-Braun (D-IL), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Nay
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Nunn (D-GA), Yea
Packwood (R-OR), Yea
Pell (D-RI), Yea
Pressler (R-SD), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Riegle (D-MI), Nay
Robb (D-VA), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Roth (R-DE), Yea
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Sasser (D-TN), Nay
Shelby (D-AL), Nay
Simon (D-IL), Yea
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Nay
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Nay
Thurmond (R-SC), Nay
Wallop (R-WY), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Nay
Wofford (D-PA), Nay

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
2. K&R. You are right. We did a good job conveying our feelings about Syria. We need to let our
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 01:55 PM
Sep 2013

feelings be known about this trade deal also. Everybody who reads this thread should call their Congressmen and women.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. The TPP, at least, is not defensible.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 01:58 PM
Sep 2013

Right? Right?
I have not seen much of anything - "it will help poor countries" (no it won't, it will just bring us all down to that level) - and I was wondering if those who defend everything believe the TPP and Fast Track are just eleventy-dimensional chess or something. Obama is just kidding around or whatever.....

pa28

(6,145 posts)
8. I've seen the spin in some of the more wonky corners of the internet. It's chess again.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:14 PM
Sep 2013

The TPP is actually a grand strategy to neutralize China's growing hegemon in the pacific rim. How this will happen as a result of the TPP was not fully explained but I'm sure it will be.



So brace yourself.

beerandjesus

(1,301 posts)
14. Yeah, I'm waiting for it too... it's part of Obama's strategy to get card check or something
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:52 PM
Sep 2013

Suspiciously quiet here, though. Then again, they were just agitating for war before, and didn't decide that it was really diplomacy till the Russians and Syrians made a deal.

alsame

(7,784 posts)
5. The US is the big problem with
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:00 PM
Sep 2013

the globalized serfdom desired by the masters of the universe. They have to bring US wages down.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
7. People ask why they send jobs overseas. They say because our unions are too expensive and they can
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:04 PM
Sep 2013

get more affordable labor elsewhere. How is that even a defense? Why are they allowed to make the entire global labor force into a sweat shop?

alsame

(7,784 posts)
12. Many Americans accept into this
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:44 PM
Sep 2013

because it means lower prices on consumer goods. I've had more than one person tell me they hate having products made outside the US but they don't want to pay more for things made at home by - gasp - union workers.

They don't see the big picture.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
66. They also don't understand that it wouldn't mean a huge jump in prices
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 04:09 PM
Sep 2013

they have brainwashed everyone to think that if things were made in the US the prices would triple.

This just isn't true. Usually it only makes a buck or 2 difference in a $25 item. Prices are not as cheap as they SHOULD be with overseas labor because corporations took the price differential as profit and very little of the savings was passed on to consumers to begin with. If they kept their required rate of return (for profit) the same as 20 years ago, we'd pay paying half of what we pay now for goods. Instead, in the corporate world, profits must increase every quarter. If profit margins were 10% 20 years ago, they are 25% now. The whole system is so messed up that corporations push for shit like the TPP because they MUST have ever increasing profits or their company stock takes a huge hit. It's all fucked up and is completely unsustainable.

alsame

(7,784 posts)
67. I completely agree. Plus, the quality
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 04:13 PM
Sep 2013

isn't as good with many, many items. Not to mention poison in dog food and baby formula.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
9. This Travesty Has To Start Getting Traction As A Huge Game Changing Issue
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:31 PM
Sep 2013

Attention Obama apologists - Obama is all in on this atrocious agreement.

We're already hurling headlong into gun toting corporate fascism (guns for the blind, really?), this will put the move there on steroids.

All thanks to the few like Mike Papantonio, Jim Hightower, and Thom Hartmann who are on this, shame on "lib" talkers who either don't know about it or don't want to embarrass their hero.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
10. The president has called TPP his "top prioity"
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:37 PM
Sep 2013

But then.....everything is his "top priority". I judge him by his deeds. Not his words.

TPP is a truly evil deed.



Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
42. An evil deed, indeed.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 12:12 AM
Sep 2013

I'm SO disappointed.

Why couldn't he just pull a Syria? You know, act like you really want it even though you really don't knowing your opponents will oppose you just for being you. He goes beyond this: He really does want this. WTF!!??

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
13. I'm sure cutting wages,
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 02:52 PM
Sep 2013

worker's rights, and enviromental protections will be spun on DU as eleven-dimensional chess by the usual gas-bags.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
17. We can BEAT China. They work college grads for $22 a day. We can do it for $20!!!
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 03:10 PM
Sep 2013

They are so screwed...

TPP! USA! TPP! USA!!!

antigop

(12,778 posts)
18. and who played a leading part in drafting the TPP? Hillary Clinton.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 03:35 PM
Sep 2013

According to Business Week:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=67554

Cue the "hater"/"basher" posts....countdown...3...2....1

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
19. The President and the Party Leadership ALREADY know this.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 03:50 PM
Sep 2013

That is why they are working so hard to keep Obama's Top Priority, the TPP, a "secret".

They want it to be a Fast Track Done Deal before Americans who Work-for-a-Living find out how BAD this stinks.

The 30 year plan that started with Reagan's Union Busting and NeoLiberal Trickle Down Free Market Economics is almost complete.
It will be a LONG hard Battle for the Working Class to regain a VOICE and REPRESENTATION in our Party, and OUR Government.



You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
20. Why is Obama stalling? Is he waiting for the Repubs to agree to cut SS with a chained CPI?
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 03:54 PM
Sep 2013

What else can he do to sweeten the pot?

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
21. I've been trying to tell you guys for years that they won't stop with the auto industry.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 04:04 PM
Sep 2013

I've also posted many times that no, people will not say "this is too far!" just because your job and community are the next on the chopping block.

Based on the amount of people agitating to reverse the damage done by NAFTA, I'd say that TPP is a shoe-in.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
22. Ye of little faith. Obama's got this.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 04:23 PM
Sep 2013

I imagine one of the reasons it is being kept so secret is because our President said he feels addressing climate change is a moral obligation.
One can only imagine the sweeping carbon regulations and anti-fracking, pro-environment conditions he is adding to it.
If Wall St found out they'd freak, hence, the secrecy.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
23. Third way philosophy in action.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 04:29 PM
Sep 2013

You give your corporate sponsors and megadonors exactly what they want while at the same time realizing you are damaging working americans.

You then absolve this by adding toothless conditions for labor and environmental standards. It's BS and at some level they know it but I think it helps them sleep at night. Maybe.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
26. Except for it being known that the only people this isn't secret from are those operating
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 05:17 PM
Sep 2013

the multi-national corporations, I'm sure that would be the spin. Some may give it a go just because dishonesty and false witness are second nature now but mostly they will dodge and try to play on guilt by stressing the standards of living in the various assholes of the Earth that they want us to live like to please the overlords, no few feeling confident of their own ascendancy as "upwardly mobile" and "professional" the system will reward them personally.

TBF

(32,047 posts)
31. lololol -
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 07:19 PM
Sep 2013

You need to go back to your war room and work on this strategy some more. DU swings older in age, and many of us watched the manufacturing sector get decimated in the 80s. Those jobs are gone and income inequality is greater than it's been in the past 100 years. You're going to have to come up with something much more polished to convince us we all want to live in tents and support the wealthiest 1% in their multiple palaces around the world.

We're not fooled by a democratic president doing this and we will fight you.

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
65. The TPP is a disaster for combating climate change
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 04:01 PM
Sep 2013

It makes the massive natural gas reserves we've recently discovered via fracking widely available for export to the rest of the world. It's a boom for the frackers, not an impediment to them.

And, far from being a green energy source, gas derived from fracking is WORSE for the climate than even burning coal, simply for the fact that so much methane escapes uncontrolled from the formations when they're cracked open.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
70. Not a chance. Our President has said he is serious about climate change.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 02:18 PM
Sep 2013

I sure don't want to call him a liar. One cannot be serious about climate change and support fracking, Keystone or clean coal. I'm sure once the TPP comes out showing fracking outlawed, Keystone shut down and a call to reduce air traffic by half, ending oil corporation subsidies while increasing renewable energy subsidies people will calm down.

libdude

(136 posts)
24. Rep. Alan Grayson
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 04:47 PM
Sep 2013

has read this TPP and has concluded that it is a bad deal in almost every aspect for the American worker. One point he made is this, if a foreign company feels that U.S. environmental regulations disadvantage their business endeavor, they can address this in court and if successful can receive compensation.
Why is President Obama an advocate for this trade treaty? Is this his NAFTA? Why the secrecy on this?
Contact Rep. Grayson for further information. My Senator Sherrod Brown has been a strong advocate for " fair trade " seeing " free trade " only damages the American worker.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
28. Do these stupid bastard corporate types ever wonder why they cant sell into the third world?
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 05:19 PM
Sep 2013

Its because they dont make enough money.

By extension, if they impoverish every worker in the world who will buy their next iPhone, or HDTV, or any other discretionary purchase?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
47. Huh? India and China are much more active markets than the US for most corporations
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 02:06 AM
Sep 2013

Even the literal 1 percent in those countries is 25 million people; take it more realistically to the to 10 percent and you've got 250 million people significantly richer than Americans.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
59. Those countries have a rising middle class
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 12:41 PM
Sep 2013

They want to shrink (or eliminate) it here in the US.

The poor in China and India dont buy iPhones or other discretionary luxury purchases because they have no money.

 

MotherPetrie

(3,145 posts)
29. Never forget whose administration is trying to screw American workers with this obscene agreement.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 05:49 PM
Sep 2013

TexasTowelie

(112,121 posts)
33. I'm fortunate to be in the ten percent that won't see a wage cut.
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:47 PM
Sep 2013

But since I have no wages I can't get them cut at all.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
36. Pay cuts for 90% of U.S. workers is good for 'Merika, for the bidness of 'Merika
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 09:56 PM
Sep 2013

is bidness. Therefore, it stands to reason government must continue to promote the welfare of bidness and the uber-wealthy at the expense of all others rather than promote the general welfare in a manner the entire society benefits.

 

Pharaoh

(8,209 posts)
38. I've called, signed petions
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 10:55 PM
Sep 2013

email my reps............

It all seems pretty pointless, as things keep sliding down hill. We no longer have a Democracy. We have Fascism..........


“The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.” ---Prophet & Philosopher Frank Zappa

senseandsensibility

(17,000 posts)
39. All predictions about the horrendous effects of trade deals
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 11:54 PM
Sep 2013

for workers have proven true. The giant sucking sound really is our middle class being destroyed. This one is no different and the fact that this administration supports it is heartbreaking.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
43. I notice that none of the "Obama Group" have posted here. They are probably too busy
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 12:39 AM
Sep 2013

trying to dig up dirt on Greenwald.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
44. Don't worry.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 12:45 AM
Sep 2013

When the TPP comes up for Congressional approval they'll be along to defend the indefensible.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
45. What's fun is to ask them if they support the TPP, or fracking, or indefinite detention. They will
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 12:49 AM
Sep 2013

go for the distraction, like: "look there is Snowden and he is terrible." IMO they are more dangerous than the right-wing.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
60. they are more dangerous than the right-wing
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 12:43 PM
Sep 2013

They ARE the right wing, just with a (D) after their voter registration.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
46. It's not as if not passing trade agreements stops jobs from going overseas
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 02:04 AM
Sep 2013

It's an attempt to have some control over it; it's not the cause.

That and we like to sell soybeans.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
68. Reading comprehension fail
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 07:13 PM
Sep 2013

The TPP is a symptom, not cause, of these economic trends we don't like. I oppose it (sometimes treating symptoms is what you can do) but stopping it won't stop the things in it from happening, just with no government influence over them.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
69. If you said that you support the TPP anywhere in your thread, then I will admit I missed it.
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 12:04 AM
Sep 2013

But I disagree that it's only a symptom. It is a very strong tool to be used by the international corporations to hamstring our sovereignty. We need to draw a line. Stopping it will not fix our imbalance of trade but is a step in the correct direction. Dont you agree?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
77. I find it sadly amusing. They speak in some kind of code and when you try to guess what
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 08:05 PM
Feb 2014

the hell they mean, they get rude. Like this exchange. I guess he is trying to say that we would lose jobs even without the trade agreements so therefore dont sweat the TPP.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
56. Some of the TPP countries are already developed
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 11:00 AM
Sep 2013

Canada, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand are ready to give up their citizens' jobs to countries like Mexico and Peru too. The one country I'm really worried about is Brunei, they have a population of 400,000.
That said, there has never been a reason for fast track and contacting your Representatives can't hurt.


IDemo

(16,926 posts)
57. When I read "Third World America" by Arianna Huffington
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 11:06 AM
Sep 2013

I thought it was a somewhat chilling but perhaps overblown hypothesis. I have no doubt now that we are headed in that direction.

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
58. Oh I'm sure if that happened Obama would fix it later
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 11:28 AM
Sep 2013

Probably at the same time he revisits and corrects all the damage from NAFTA like he promised.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
64. The fix is in. We are not a democracy; we are a de facto oligarchy, ruled by the Investor Class.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 03:56 PM
Sep 2013

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
71. China even pays postage for imports to the US
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 02:49 PM
Sep 2013

I discovered this on Ebay. I pay 20 bucks to ship an item to Europe. Chinese pay zero. Who has the competitive advantage?

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
72. This deal is not Democratic in any way shape or form. No real Democrat would suggest this "deal".
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 02:52 PM
Sep 2013
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study: "Trade" ...