General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAt this point if he bypasses Summers it will look like another cavein. What decent future appointee
will accept an appoint just to be left twisting in the wind.
Even if rejected by the senate, which I doubt it would be better than caving.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)the commentary on DU is embarrassing on several levels.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)and trumped up outrage?
CK_John
(10,005 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers has suspended ties with Citigroup Inc. (C) while the White House considers nominating him to serve as the Federal Reserves next chairman, the company said.
Mr. Summers has withdrawn from participation in all Citi events while he is under consideration to be chairman of the Federal Reserve, Danielle Romero-Apsilos, a spokeswoman for the firm, said yesterday in an e-mailed statement.
Summers, a Harvard University Professor and former top economic adviser to President Barack Obama, was to give the keynote address on challenges to the global economy at a Citigroup research seminar Oct. 13, according to an invitation on the website for the firm, the third-biggest U.S. lender. The Washington event coincides with the annual meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Citigroup hired Summers, 58, for small private-bank client and institutional client meetings, Romero-Apsilos said in an earlier e-mailed statement. He provided insight on a broad range of topics including the global and domestic economy.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-13/summers-suspends-citigroup-ties-while-considered-for-fed.html
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)If you live by the words with which you exhort the rest of us, anticipation and foreshadowing just aren't a part of your world. In any case, whether Summers is nominated or not, the rest of us are aware he's a finalist for the job.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)agree with his Washington insiders.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)It is immediately spun as a calculated victory.
The obstructionists are no longer just Congress.
Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)lol
gotto love DU.
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)Salviati
(6,008 posts)and you are aware that he hasn't been nominated yet, so there's no one "left twisting in the wind" just yet.
IMO, the best thing that Obama could do is announce that he's whittled his potential list of nominees down to 2, and summers aint on it.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)malaise
(268,930 posts)NEVER
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)because it is critical to put a stop to exactly the kind of "decent" he represents.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)less of that group willing to put up with political firestorm attached to getting confirmed, so who you going to pick if not Summers.
I would put Sen Warren in the capable pool.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)job. Particularly since you include Warren who has never been a Governor or even a high level operative in the organization (which I agree with).
I think you are off by at least an order of magnitude, probably more between people in the system, academics, economists, folks in the banking industry, and probably some percentage of high level CFO's.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)is capable and respected.
I hope Obama is considering her for Fed chair.
http://www.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/The-Case-For-Janet-Yellen-In-One-Sentence-4816544.php
Excerpt:
In the late '90s, Janet Yellen was worried about the economy overheating. This was thoroughly discussed in Lawrence Meyer's book, "A Term At The Fed."
In the mid-2000s, Yellen was worried about the housing bubble, and the impact of a bust.
Post-crisis, Yellen has recognized that inflation is the least of our problems, and that everything the Fed does should be oriented towards addressing the unemployment problem. (Hence the "dovish" reputation.)
Rex
(65,616 posts)does not care about style points.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)bhikkhu
(10,715 posts)If you look at the whole history of political appointments, this is just how its supposed to work. The president should be able to decide whoever he wants, and consider all input during that process. Finding some way to look at things where he can be excoriated for going either way is way too familiar a tactic.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)That would be a first...
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)If he'd wanted Summers he could have appointed him several months ago. Summers was never shoe-in.