Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,986 posts)
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:30 PM Sep 2013

Wall Street Banks Obtain Market Data Ten Minutes Before Everyone Else

DESVARIEUX: So, Bill, can you just explain for our viewers what exactly is front running? And can you give us a bit of background to this story?

BLACK: Front running can be either that you're trading and you know that your clients are going to be buying or selling something, and you trade ahead of them to take advantage to what's going to happen to prices, or in this case you get market information before everyone else does and you get to trade in advance on that specialized information, in which case you have an enormous advantage.

DESVARIEUX: And what did Thomson Reuters do?

BLACK: Thomson Reuters partnered with the University of Michigan, which is where I spent seven years studying and got two of my degrees. And the University of Michigan has been famous for 50 years for its research in a particular area, and this particular subset is a survey of business confidence. And this survey of business confidence is used all over the world as one of the leading indicators of what's going to happen economically. So places like the Federal Reserve, in deciding how to move interest rates and such, look very heavily at this Michigan report.

And what we know that Michigan agreed to do in its contracts with Thomson Reuters was to give certain clients who paid extra money a two-second advantage in how soon they would get that information. Now, that might not sound like much, but these are for folks who are engaged in what is known as hypervelocity trading or hyperfrequency trading. So they actually trade in under a millisecond, under a thousandth of a second. So this is like two years' worth of, you know, advanced information in terms of how fast these guys operate. That's the part we know.



More:
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10714
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/16-major-firms-may-have-received-early-data-from-thomson-reuters-20130905

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wall Street Banks Obtain Market Data Ten Minutes Before Everyone Else (Original Post) kpete Sep 2013 OP
K&R Been going on for years. That's how G$ became G$. Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #1
bingo. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #2
this is trading places questionseverything Sep 2013 #7
Exactly, ask Martha Stewart DonCoquixote Sep 2013 #20
Martha Stewart served 5 months. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #22
corrected , though DonCoquixote Sep 2013 #25
Holy Shit! Wall St.'s fig leaf just fell off folks. 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #3
that's fucked up gopiscrap Sep 2013 #4
To be honest with you, So What? Anyone who buys stocks based on a 10-minute price is gambling. 1-Old-Man Sep 2013 #5
You can make a few dollars that way. but these Wall Street bankers are raking in billions liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #6
They're not gambling if they know what the outcome is going to be. bigmonkey Sep 2013 #8
exactly. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #9
I once knew a man that ran a gambling operation zeemike Sep 2013 #11
These aren't people trading. They're too slow. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #10
It's insider trading. Or, as Carlin put it, "The game is rigged".... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #12
Yep, the small investor shouldn't even play this game. sarcasmo Sep 2013 #17
They appeal to greed with the occasional "Rags to Riches" story... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #19
It's not gambling when the dice are loaded. Lucky Luciano Sep 2013 #14
That's because you don't have a computer fast enough jmowreader Sep 2013 #23
Automated computer trading needs to be outlawed. RC Sep 2013 #13
That would ban a lot of legitimate trading jmowreader Sep 2013 #24
It seems to me like the biggest lobby for reforming the big banks should be Wall Street itself. Marr Sep 2013 #15
The Ultra Wealthy Get Richer - The Rest Of Us Not So Much cantbeserious Sep 2013 #16
The role of the University of Michigan should be noted. Jim Lane Sep 2013 #18
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #21
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
1. K&R Been going on for years. That's how G$ became G$.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:33 PM
Sep 2013

It's only insider trading if you're not really an insider.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
3. Holy Shit! Wall St.'s fig leaf just fell off folks.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:49 PM
Sep 2013

Now, it's like Brother Leonard says, "everybody knows the dice are loaded... "

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
5. To be honest with you, So What? Anyone who buys stocks based on a 10-minute price is gambling.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:56 PM
Sep 2013

I have owned shares in a number of individual companies (as distinguished from Mutual Funds) over the years and I did not invest in any one of them based on what the price was 10 minutes ago or what it might be 10 minutes into the future. Maybe that's because I've never bought a stock that I held for less than a year either. 10 minutes is really neither here no there, I buy based on my expectation of both dividend income and price appreciation greater than the rate of inflation over time.

Maybe I'm just old fashion.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
6. You can make a few dollars that way. but these Wall Street bankers are raking in billions
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 05:59 PM
Sep 2013

by having special rules put in place just for their wealthiest clients. There are two Americas, and there are two stock markets.

bigmonkey

(1,798 posts)
8. They're not gambling if they know what the outcome is going to be.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 06:20 PM
Sep 2013

As the W.C. Fields character said, when asked "Is this a game of chance?": "Not the way I play it, no."

This is cheating, straight up.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
11. I once knew a man that ran a gambling operation
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 06:42 PM
Sep 2013

And I asked him how he did it.
He told me he never made a bet he did not know the outcome of.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
10. These aren't people trading. They're too slow.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 06:41 PM
Sep 2013

These are computers trading with each other.

- The humans in the game now are the pawns.....

K&R

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
12. It's insider trading. Or, as Carlin put it, "The game is rigged"....
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 06:43 PM
Sep 2013

You already KNOW the price has peaked and sell it to some poor sucker who sees it still rising only to watch it plummet and lose him money.

You can also manipulate markets if you have prior data. You can cause buying frenzies and cash out before anyone suspects.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
19. They appeal to greed with the occasional "Rags to Riches" story...
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 01:24 AM
Sep 2013

But the norm is being reduced to rags by the rich.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
23. That's because you don't have a computer fast enough
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 03:56 PM
Sep 2013

High Frequency Trading in a nutshell:

As a trader you know that someone buying a huge block of stock will cause the price to rise slightly, and that it takes a few milliseconds for an order to be registered in a broker-dealer's system. An HFT firm buys order flow from a BD and enters buy orders for massive volumes in the window between order entry and order acceptance. Then after the price goes up a penny or so, they sell it all. This sounds dumb as shit but if you work in 10 million share increments, you make a pissload of money...and if you do it fast enough you never need your own money to trade with.

This is why I keep saying the financial transaction tax needs to be one cent per share: it's low enough no legitimate trader will complain, but it's high enough to kill HFT. No one will stay in an HFT position to try getting 2 cents per share gain - too much risk of losing your ass if you do.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
13. Automated computer trading needs to be outlawed.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 07:52 PM
Sep 2013

Make it so a actual flesh and blood human being needs to be sitting at a keyboard doing the actual transactions.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
24. That would ban a lot of legitimate trading
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:14 PM
Sep 2013

I am thinking stop loss orders (sell if your stock goes below a preset price) and options trading.

High frequency trading can best be dealt with by taxing it out of existence.

Now...what needs to be banned are some of the esoteric shit they've done in derivatives. Go find the prospectus for the Goldman Sachs Scandal. You will see that they told the potential mark exactly what they were going to do - the term "synthetic exposure to the mortgage market" is used frequently. That means exactly one thing: the CDO made of naked credit default swaps will be used, and only one counterparty makes money. Now, considering that Goldman is probably the best derivatives house on the Street (the infamous The World's Largest Hedge Fund Is a Fraud paper sent the SEC to Goldman for help analyzing Madoff) does anyone really think they'd set up a deal that made them poorer? If it is legal to bet against a security without having a financial stake in it you know it will be abused.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
15. It seems to me like the biggest lobby for reforming the big banks should be Wall Street itself.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 08:18 PM
Sep 2013

No one wants to gamble in a rigged casino. The game is so ridiculously stacked now, that it's 1% of Wall Street that's reaping the benefits.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
18. The role of the University of Michigan should be noted.
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 09:14 PM
Sep 2013

Wall Street traders are trying to gain an edge any way they can. Thomson Reuters is a for-profit business that's trying to cater to the market it finds. Yes, their actions are pernicious, but not particularly worse than what you'd expect from decisionmakers in their positions.

The University of Michigan, however, is supposed to be an academic institution, conducting its surveys for the purpose of promoting knowledge. The contract excerpt quoted in the linked article reveals the University entering into a deal with Thomson Reuters by which, presumably for a fee, the University expressly authorizes Thomson Reuters to do a tiered release of the information.

For shame!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street Banks Obtain ...