Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has there been anything new in the federal investigation of Zimmerman? (Original Post) Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 OP
he got his gun back as soon as he was acquitted TorchTheWitch Sep 2013 #1
I remember reading he did not get his gun back as it was evidence in the federal inquiry. Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #3
turns out you're right TorchTheWitch Sep 2013 #8
we really live in a fucked up country gopiscrap Sep 2013 #16
no Skittles Sep 2013 #2
If you want I should kick some ass? Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #4
have at it Skittles Sep 2013 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #7
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Skittles Sep 2013 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #10
Fail. (nt) Control-Z Sep 2013 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #12
They're not exactly going to tell us if there is (nt) Recursion Sep 2013 #6
No and there won't be on the Martin case...maybe something else some day.. pipoman Sep 2013 #13
Not if they charge him with a federal charge gopiscrap Sep 2013 #15
What 'civil rights violation' will they charge Zim with? pipoman Sep 2013 #17
Zimmy indicated that he was tired of black thugs gopiscrap Sep 2013 #18
"indicated" is meaningless..he didn't say that.. pipoman Sep 2013 #19
fucking asshole Zimmy, I am sure the feds won't have enough guts gopiscrap Sep 2013 #14

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
1. he got his gun back as soon as he was acquitted
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 03:26 AM
Sep 2013

As for the fed case, I'm sure Holder will be warming his butt on it for a couple more winters.


Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
3. I remember reading he did not get his gun back as it was evidence in the federal inquiry.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 03:30 AM
Sep 2013

Isn't that why there was a big fuss from the gun nuts to buy him a new one? Am I remembering this correctly?

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
8. turns out you're right
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 04:34 AM
Sep 2013

They were going to give it back after his acquittal but that was put on hold a few days later because of the fed case. He was entitled to buy another one though which is probably why the gun nuts were sending him money to buy one... or a whole arsenal. There were tons of articles announcing he was getting it back but very little about that decision being put on hold, but I did find this article about that....
http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-gun-back-buy/story?id=19713692

Response to Skittles (Reply #5)

Response to Skittles (Reply #9)

Response to Control-Z (Reply #11)

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
13. No and there won't be on the Martin case...maybe something else some day..
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 10:18 AM
Sep 2013

there is nothing to charge him with federally in the Martin case that wouldn't constitute double jeopardy..

gopiscrap

(23,756 posts)
15. Not if they charge him with a federal charge
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 05:25 PM
Sep 2013

that's what happened with the Klan in the 60's they were acquitted of murder but a bunch of them did time for Federal Civil Rights violations.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
17. What 'civil rights violation' will they charge Zim with?
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 06:23 PM
Sep 2013

I have seen nothing which would be chargeable in any of the stories or testimony..

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
19. "indicated" is meaningless..he didn't say that..
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 06:31 PM
Sep 2013

and there were no witnesses, friends, relatives, or acquaintances, who I have seen, who make any claims he is a racist. Someone who is a racist usually don't keep it a secret. I wish he'd been convicted too, but we can't nor should we encourage or wish the law be twisted to convict someone who is acquitted, no matter who they are or what they have done..

There simply is no "civil rights violation" to charge him with.

gopiscrap

(23,756 posts)
14. fucking asshole Zimmy, I am sure the feds won't have enough guts
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 05:24 PM
Sep 2013

to indict him for a civil rights violation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has there been anything n...